Recent Comments
- 51Posted by tutor-turtle 1 week, 1 day ago to Trump vs. the Judges: Judicial Treachery and the End of DemocracyWhy do we even need a President, or a Congress for that matter, when we have unelected, unaccountable judges (from Canada, no less) to dictate our foreign policy?
DemonRats have no policy America wants, needs or asked for.
They don't have any arguments that fly with the vast majority of the electorate.
What they have are unelected radical judges who can use their judicial overreach with no accountability to the people whom through their
poorly though-out actions, (read: one-world-goverment views) negatively affect.
We elected President Trump in overwhelming numbers.
Stand up and help him help the people who voted for him, or get the fv¢k out of the way. - 52Posted by $ Thoritsu 1 week, 1 day ago to Trump vs. the Judges: Judicial Treachery and the End of DemocracySCOTUS should be reminded of this in arguments by the government.
- 53Posted by $ Thoritsu 1 week, 1 day ago to Trump vs. the Judges: Judicial Treachery and the End of DemocracyThere are certainly at least two traitors in SCOTUS, and three international agents of totalitarianism.
- 54Posted by freedomforall 1 week, 1 day ago to Trump vs. the Judges: Judicial Treachery and the End of DemocracySchumer has been acting against the American People for decades.
Prosecute him and his cohorts for treason and take him to Gitmo to get the truth about all his conspirators. - 55Posted by freedomforall 1 week, 1 day ago to Trump vs. the Judges: Judicial Treachery and the End of DemocracyThanks for a very rational argument, Thor. 👍
The SCOTUS unwillingness to hear any 2020 election challenges proved that the SCOTUS is political, not rational.
NIFO the traitors in SCOTUS.
(I use NIFO as a 4 letter word. ;^) - 56Posted by GaryL 1 week, 1 day ago to Trump vs. the Judges: Judicial Treachery and the End of DemocracyI find it very interesting how Chuck the Schmuck brags about how they appointed 325 LIBERAL judges. Maybe I am wrong but isn't the Judiciary supposed to be Non Partisan?
- 57Posted by GaryL 1 week, 1 day ago to Another Liberal Friend Bites the DustThere is no way to win an argument with a liberal so for that reason it's not worth my breath or effort. I usually just let them spew their BS and find it rather entertaining when all I will do is laugh at them, friends and family included.
- 58Leftists are getting angrier, at exponential rates, as Donald Trump continues his war on their fantasy world.
If there is a peaceful solution to this insanity, I only hope it's implemented soon. - 59Posted by $ allosaur 1 week, 1 day ago to Chief Justice Roberts Linked To Radical Activist Judges In An Invite Only "Good Old Boy Kinda Club"Very interesting. My gut is screaming cover up.
Hard for me to believe someone cooking up a big whopping lie about Roberts being in that secret club.
I know I am imperfect and has of course been wrong before but I can't help but smell one helluva stench. - 60Posted by marktayloruk 1 week, 1 day ago to Trump vs. the Judges: Judicial Treachery and the End of DemocracyAll Supreme Court Justices should face reconfirmation every five years.
- 61The methods you point out:1) demeaning your source and 2) demeaning you, are simple fallacies of logical argument that work well, because an overwhelming majority of people do not have any idea how to conduct an argument, and many subjects are far too complicated for most people (e.g. AGW).
I also have lots of leftist friends in a world of cognitive dissonance. The are comfortable in their world of presumed self-righteous, moral and technical superiority, which is superior in neither. They DO NOT want to argue the fundamentals because they are comfortable and really don't know any fundamentals. For example, even ones I got into firearms and now go shooting with sometimes are just fine with limiting firearms of features like ARs. They can not objectively see that if ARs are prohibited today, revolvers can go tomorrow, and nothing the next day. They DO NOT understand, and DO NOT want to.
SCOTUS needs to rule on one of these bad laws and assert that any firearm allowed (not necessarily even used) by any law enforcement agency MUST be allowed by individuals. Period. This is the simplest of all legal tests for firearm technology. - 62Posted by mccannon01 1 week, 1 day ago to Trump vs. the Judges: Judicial Treachery and the End of DemocracyWhat we are up against is the left's idea of "democracy" currently running the Democrat party is actually Marxism hiding behind the name (or any name that works at any given moment in time) in order to bring about one-party rule (theirs). Then they can usher in what will inevitably become like the "Peoples Democratic Republic of [North] Korea" where "We The People" actually means "We The People of the Government". It doesn't matter if these activist judges or other minions of the left actually understand the concept as long as they rule and vote (or loot and burn) in favor of the party. I can't believe all these judges are ignorant of the concept. They are deliberate. They are unconstitutional in attempting to overthrow the executive branch in a traitorous coup playing out in a Marxist main stream media and behind the scenes in an entrenched government bureaucracy infiltrated by other Marxists and useful idiots - you don't need a lot, just enough to pull it off.
The Trump team is a gigantic roadblock to the coup and lawfare is one of the tools the left still has in place. Pop the corn, it's going to get worse before it gets better. - 63"They always do this. 1- attack you for sources of information you don't use. Then, 2- insult you. "
Yep, this, and they hope you will be so insulted you'll forget to go back to the argument and instead, try to defend your character or intelligence, or whatever they are after on that day. Oh, I see you already stated exactly the same thought! I tried a few times mentioning "ad hominem" attacks, but most of them didn't know what that means. <---yep I just attacked their intelligence...in this case, justified. - 64Posted by $ Thoritsu 1 week, 1 day ago to Trump vs. the Judges: Judicial Treachery and the End of DemocracyAn unconstitutional law (or ruling) remains unconstitutional. Until SCOTUS rules, some of these should just be ignored. The Executive provides the ONLY enforcement recourse. Why police yourself if you completely disagree?
DOGE access to whatever the Executive wants them to review is a great example. The Executive should simply ignore any limiting ruling, and assert "I am the elected Executive. If I want information distilled from data within an Executive Department, I will get it, and no court may inhibit this. It is fundamental to the separation of powers. Some Executive actions may be enjoined, but not information. SCOTUS, please get around to reviewing this, and setting a precedent on information, so we can move on." - 65Posted by BostonTEA 1 week, 1 day ago to Chief Justice Roberts Linked To Radical Activist Judges In An Invite Only "Good Old Boy Kinda Club"The Townhall article cited above NOW has the headline:
Update: Social Media FALSELY CLAIMS Chief Justice John Roberts Is In Secret Club of Judges
(emphasis added).
Hmm. - 66Laughing my Butt Off
- 67Posted by JakeOrilley 1 week, 1 day ago to IN THE MEME TYME 3/24/25 EDITION: No ReturnsThanks OUC!! Have been following and appreciative your Friday Funnies, and Monday Memes for years and just this morning noticed that you are OUC - I had always read your name as old Guy Carl...and many times had addressed you as OGC - gotta get my eyes checked!!! Have a great one!
- 68Posted by mhubb 1 week, 2 days ago to Trump vs. the Judges: Judicial Treachery and the End of Democracyit is much, much worse
the Illegal Aliens Act was passed with a clause that excepts it from Judicial Review, per Fox News
ANY "judge" that tried is violating Law and SCOTUS
any such "judge" that tried to stop this law MUST BE removed from being a Judge - 69Posted by freedomforall 1 week, 2 days ago to Burrito Now, Pay Later: DoorDash - Klarna Deal Feeds US Debt AddictionCould several generations have never learned the hazards of debt ?
I don't recall being bombarded with advertising for credit when I was young,
(and my parents did constantly emphasize why carrying debt could be unwise.) - 70Did you see the dolphin pod being the welcoming party for the capsule when it splashed down? That was incredible...
- 71Posted by $ Abaco 1 week, 2 days ago to Burrito Now, Pay Later: DoorDash - Klarna Deal Feeds US Debt AddictionI can't wrap my head around this. Are we this close to economic Armageddon?
- 72Laughing
- 73Thanks Freedom
- 74True that!
- 75More than likely, a mistake