Recent Comments

California is a state where people reside "where they intensely disagree with the government..." Red Bluff and Redding come to mind. These spots in California are really isolated enclaves because in MANY of the other regions the more conservative minded have left in droves. The impact of the California (alone) exodus on the rest of the nation has been massive. Look at your real estate prices in other states. I don't think all of that is inflation. Regarding California - look up the story on the State of Jefferson.

Glad to hear he's ok. I was wondering about that!

Do believe you hit that full metal jacket's blasting cap.

Very recently me dino heard Trump tell us that he is supported by "the silent majority."
Do believe he referred to a majority that stays pretty much silent~~EXCEPT WHEN WE VOTE!
All WE have to do is to keep the loud-mouthed Jackass Party minority from cheating.
We all know they managed to pull that off before.
Never forget that Infamous January 6.

You are most welcome. I'm glad I recalled having that contact information and got to talk to DOB.

Thank you for following up, dino. 👍
I'm glad to hear DOB is well. ;^)

In the name of the best within you, do not sacrifice this world to those who are its worst. In the name of the values that keep you alive, do not let your vision of man be distorted by the ugly, the cowardly, the mindless... Do not let your fire go out, spark by irreplaceable spark, in the hopeless swamps of the approximate, the not-quite, the not-yet, the not-at-all. Do not let the hero in your soul perish, in lonely frustration for the life you deserved, but have never been able to reach. Check your road and the nature of your battle. The world you desired can be won, it exists, it is real, it is possible, it's yours.”
Ayn Rand

You lucked out, we on the other hand got 12" on the Connecticut shore line abet sorry to say it wasn't enough to bury bloomy and murphy (from the list above)
I'm so embarrassed by those two

You can spin the definition of "treason" however you like--and you're far from alone in yours--but I'll stick to how the Constitution defines it in Article 3.

Perhaps even to die.

I respectfully disagree. It isn't a shooting war, but a war all the same. Philosophical war, undeclared to the public, but raging in private, is pitting us against each other with one side crying "freedom" as they destroy everything while the other side whispers "rationality" while playing by established rules. "Traitor" does not need a declared war to be properly used. Lawmakers who preach anarchy, break laws, take under the table payments, cheat and steal from the very constituents who elected them are beyond criminality, stepping off that slippery slope into treason. Those who tear down the rule of law and supply fuel to the fire of insurrection are indeed traitors to their country..

In a dream world, the states would be divided into blue ( the biggest cities) and the rest of the state would be red. The big cities would become enclaves of dissatisfied liberals, the rest would go about their normal business. Blue enclaves would need passports to enter red areas, red areas would need passports to get into blue areas. Separate economies, separate tax bases, blue areas make and enforce their own laws, red areas follow strict Constitutional lines, trade between the areas carefully monitored, folks would have the choice of where they want to live, what kind of laws they want to live by. It would almost be like two countries sharing a continent. I wonder just how long the blue enclaves would last...
Unrealistic, I know, but better than a shootin' war.

"Traitor" is a word constantly misused by both sides. We are not at war with anyone and have no legally declared enemies.

I agree that they are traitors, assuming that there is evidence to convict them.
So far, the Venezuela info is hearsay.

That's what we need - lists of NAMES of who's working against us,Democrats and RINOs who shouldn't get elected next cycle.

On the second Greenland one,the problem, of course, is Russia and China are both holding up big fish, too.

You outdid yourself again, Carl.
I now know what sign I'm going to put up at the next Scottish Convention in my town;^)

Of course it's brilliant. That way "they" can restrict our rights and tax us more to combat it - whatever it is.

Where I'm from the folks who grow the food are mainly conservative and too many of the free food consumers are in the city. If the SHTF it won't take much for the cities to find out where the food comes from. Even murderous Stalin and Mao couldn't make that work without massive attrition.

I'm collecting from SS Ponzi and I figure if the US went to war with itself the currency wouldn't be worth spit and neither will anything connected to it (401k, IRA, etc.). Oh wait, even if the US doesn't go to war with itself the currency isn't going to be worth spit and neither will anything connected to it. Hunker down Gulchers, it's going to be a rough ride.

I'm not sure there's a more obvious sign of their total stupidity and naiveté than "Global cooling...No? how about global warming. No? We'll call it 'Climate Change' so it covers everything! Brilliant!"

Yeah, he always had cool stuff.

You mean all the snow I'm getting here in the winter (like every other winter) in western NY ISN'T climate change???!!! LMAO! I'm wondering if "they" will switch back to global cooling like back in the '70s.

Heard at the Bronco's game the snow was flying. A little further south a broom worked on the sidewalk and drive.

I agree that it would take splitting many states and many people would be left
residing in a state where they intensely disagree with the government and
their employment makes it financially difficult to make a move elsewhere.
Many left-biased cities would be islands surrounded by a sea of right-leaning areas.