Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by edweaver 10 years, 3 months ago
    So if we use this ME's line of thinking we should be able to flood the court system with new cases. Anyone who has ever had a head injury will be able to claim wrongfully death even if they don't die until 30 years later. Where did this ME leave their brain?
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by DaveM49 10 years, 3 months ago
    I'm reminded of a 2005 film, "Fracture", in which a man attempts to murder his wife to "speed up his inheritance". He succeeds in reducing her to a "persistent vegetative state", on complete life support. The film deals with his efforts to 1: fight an attempted murder charge and 2: gain Power Of Attorney to "pull the plug". He succeeds in both, only to find that once his wife is dead, he is charged with murder.

    I believe there is some precedent for this sort of situation. Certainly veterans who die as the result of injuries received in combat, even decades later, are regarded as casualties of war. I cannot imagine criminal charges stemming from James Brady's death succeeding. But did John Hinckley contribute to his death? Certainly.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
  • Posted by Hiraghm 10 years, 3 months ago
    Double-jeopardy.

    But, they're going to try to pull a Terry Nichols on Hinckley.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ 10 years, 3 months ago
      Double jeopardy requires being charged for the same crime twice. In this case, the second crime would be a homicide of some level.

      Sure seems they're on a gun-grabbing theme to me... hardly a surprise with our Dear Leader, The One, Barack Hussein Obama (mmm, mmm, mmm).
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
      • Posted by Hiraghm 10 years, 3 months ago
        Like I said, trying to pull a Terry Nichols.

        The act was trying to shoot Reagan. Period. That was the crime. To change the *charge* for the same crime is trying to do an end-run around double-jeopardy.

        Just like with Terry Nichols... they didn't like that he didn't get the death penalty for the Murrah bombing, so they tried him for a State offense, giving them two bites at the apple.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo