14

The Most Dangerous Candidate, by Robert Gore

Posted by straightlinelogic 8 years, 4 months ago to Government
38 comments | Share | Flag

Clinton continues to embrace neoconservative goals, presumably expecting different results than the chaos, instability, inability of the US to disengage, blowback terrorism, and refugee flows which mark their strategy as an abysmal failure. Per Einstein’s famous dictum, that’s insanity. Failed as it has in second-tier countries throughout the Middle East and northern Africa, the idea of directing it towards Russia, the world’s second strongest military power, is beyond insanity. Yet, there has been no more vociferous supporter of the US effort to stigmatize and replace Vladimir Putin, and isolate and provoke Russia, than Clinton.

This is an excerpt. For the full article, please click the above link.
SOURCE URL: https://straightlinelogic.com/2016/08/09/the-most-dangerous-candidate-by-robert-gore/


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by Dobrien 8 years, 4 months ago
    I am deeply saddened that the first woman likely to lead this country is this anti- women.
    The USA is filled with qualified women who would honestly bring the country together. Our nation is more divided than the Grand Canyon. Most humans and in my experience women avoid conflict with fairness and diplomacy. Women encourage the finding and development of your talents and passions. She is a great disservice to all women. In fact all humanity.
    Robert why do we always get such terrible choices for Potus?
    Who ever is elected a Dem or GOP will fill their cabinet with members of the CFR, Why?
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ sjatkins 8 years, 4 months ago
    I do not buy that Clinton is more dangerous than the completely unqualified bully boy BS candidate, Donald Trump. Yes I don't like Hillary's policies in many respects. But a candidate for POTUS is not going to rule alone. I doubt she can do as much damage as the article portrays.

    Also the truth is that Putin is smart and quite aggressive and plays the long game. China is also not to be assumed to have no aggressions and expansions in mind. Clinton is savvy enough to notice and to stop the worse of it. Trump on the other hand, despite all of his bluster, goes soft on Russia in many speeches. There is not move by Clinton to replace Putin. We couldn't if we wanted to. It is one thing to try that, and often fail, in some little Middle Eastern country. It is quite another to do it in Russia.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by mccannon01 8 years, 4 months ago
    Excellent piece of work SLL!!!

    I agree with your assessment of the Hillary foreign policy regarding Putin and the dangerous fanning of the embers by the media that supports her. A dangerous fools game of cluelessness. I know I've mentioned this before, but Russia and Islam have been at war for centuries and this is just a recent flare up. I believe Putin's approach is if a scenario can be fostered to keep the Muslims killing each other, then they won't be killing Russians. Obama/Kerry/Hillary is mucking that all up. Putin is playing international chess, Obama and Hillary still can't get a grip on checkers. [Side note in Ukraine: The new Ukraine government has been allowing Muslim re-settlement of the Crimea (Stalin kicked them out), The Russians say "NYET!"]
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Olduglycarl 8 years, 4 months ago
    hiltery and her leftest followers are either not consciously aware of their own behavior, not able to introspect or have ignored the voice of conscience and continue what can only be described as a Hegelian Dialectic agenda.

    The latter should blow the minds of the conscious living, trying to imagine how a person could possibly want and knowing engage in blatant harm and destruction. The former, might cause one some cognitive dissonance discomfort but is more likely the case... in my observational opinion.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by term2 8 years, 4 months ago
    I am finishing up the Kindle book THE PROBLEM WITH SOCIALISM. It is a great book, and Hillary is right up there promoting all the terrible tenets of socialism. The book opened my eyes as to the hidden agendas that promote socialism but tell us its for our own good.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by Herb7734 8 years, 4 months ago
    It's pretty obvious that Mrs. Clinton not only fails to learn from her mistakes but is sticking to the new ones. If there is a way to wreck our foreign policy more than it already is, it is clear that she will make a shambles of our shambles. The very fact that this woman, so obviously an evil, self-serving witch is monstrous, and unthinkable that she should be in the position of being the possible President. . Yet, she has a following that is deaf and blind to her faults.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by DrZarkov99 8 years, 4 months ago
    With 90 bodies in the wake of the Clinton machine, do you honestly think she gives a damn about the lives of our military? The woman absolutely hates people in uniform, although she might gain affection for a new Federal police force created to enforce her dictates.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by tdechaine 8 years, 4 months ago
    We all know of her record.
    But we can't ignore Trump's irrationalities; and he is the worst of pragmatists.
    The best we can hope for is Clinton as Pres. but a stronger Rep. Congress.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by DrZarkov99 8 years, 4 months ago
      Strong Republican Congress? Nearly every congresscritter is beholden to the statist establishment of power brokers, and they've folded on everything they promised the voters when it came to stopping Obama's overreach. The House, controlled by Republicans, could have refused to fund the more outrageous constitutional violations, but caved as soon as the press began to beat the drum of "stopping the government."

      Obama was pulled up short by the SCOTUS. Do you honestly think that a new panel of judges set in place by President Clinton would do anything but give her license to rule by decree? Congress would become irrelevant, as the new dictator ruled without restraint.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by tdechaine 8 years, 4 months ago
        I'm just hoping that the hatred toward Clinton and Ryan will make a difference. She shouldn't get away with as much as Obama.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by DrZarkov99 8 years, 4 months ago
          If Clinton wins in November, there's a very good chance her victory will drag enough Democrat senators into office to give Democrats control of the Senate. Once that happens, she'll be able to pack the Federal court system, including the SCOTUS, with progressive activist judges, and that will be the death knell of the constitution.

          A more likely scenario, if you're hoping for moderation, is that a Trump victory is less likely to boost Republican senators, leading to a Democrat-controlled Senate. That will slow any Trump efforts at radical change, as a Republican House and Democrat Senate are unlikely to come together. Under that situation, we could well see a SCOTUS acting with as few as five judges, with the Democrats refusing to consent to any judge Trump sends to them.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
          • Posted by tdechaine 8 years, 4 months ago
            I am expecting Hillary to win but not with enthusiasm for what she would do; that many people will split their vote with support for Rep.s in Congress to put her in check.
            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by DeanStriker 8 years, 3 months ago
    Yes, Hillary is dangerous. Ditto the Donald and the Gary. There is no candidate or anyone else in sight who can or will fix anything. We are GOVERNed, you know!
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by ObjectiveAnalyst 8 years, 4 months ago
    Hello straightlinelogic,
    Of the candidates, we can judge them by their words and/or their deeds. In the case of Clinton, her deeds speak loud and clear. Her primary opponent is being judged mostly by his words- words of ambiguity that are always given the worst of interpretations by the MSM. Of course the MSM expect us to always give benefit of the doubt to Clinton, but never to her opponents. And the third party candidates are all but ignored by them. At this point, I find our choices deplorable. ...panem et circenses.
    Respectfully,
    O.A.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Thoritsu 8 years, 4 months ago
    I don't think we should replace Putin. He is predictable. The Russians should replace him, and we should deal with him like men, not like metrosexuals.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by term2 8 years, 4 months ago
    The biggest problem with Hillary in my view is that she is so power hungry and secretive that once president, she will do things that serve HER and not the country.

    She will make secret deals all over the place and then hide what she did or manipulate the media to give her a pass.

    That bothers me.

    I think she is the one, rather than Trump, who is really scary. To be successful in business all these years, he couldnt get away with this sort of thing even if he wanted to. The media hates him, and people just wouldnt make deals with him.

    This is why Hillary is pounding on trump as having erratic behavior. Its called psychological projection and she is trying to hide what SHE does.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Stormi 8 years, 4 months ago
    Excellent article. Hillary has too many lies and criminal acts in her bag already. There is nothing to suggest she will ever reform. She intends to end gun rights, property rights via UN Agenda 21, she intends to end free speech in regard to climate science and put any who doubt it in jail. There are already law enforcement being asked fi they are willing to used guns against US citizens to enforce UN Agenda 21, which she supports. NO,if she loads the courts with those who will disragard the Constitution, no Congress, esp. the repeatedly weak spined RINOS, will do anything to stop her. It is in the hands of the people, we cannot depend on the above to fix it for us. This is our last chance. If we put in a woman-disrespecting, man-hating, black using, Sharia law accepting, Hillary, she will further feather her nest while our freedoms are lost for decade or forever.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
  • Posted by $ MichaelAarethun 8 years, 3 months ago
    Comrade Clinton hands down straight up and no debate about that

    It's not about two candidates it's about Socialst Autocracy versus Constiutional Republic.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo