Hillary Has Great Response for Those Who Care About Her Email Scandal: ‘Don’t You Want a Woman President?’
Our Dear Leader is in the White House because he is "a person of color" despite his inadequate resume for the office. HillBillary seems to think her gender makes her uniquely qualified for the same office, and I'd question her resume for the job as well.
Is that level of qualification required to be the CEO of the world's remaining superpower?
I certainly hope that more and better vetting occurs for the 2016 election.
Is that level of qualification required to be the CEO of the world's remaining superpower?
I certainly hope that more and better vetting occurs for the 2016 election.
I do not care if they stand or sit to pee.
I do not care what color they are.
I do not care for their "legacy" and efforts on their part to build that, at the expense of their actual job.
I only care that they hold to the oath of office they take and work for America, not themselves.
I fully realize that has been something of a fantasy for the last 20 years or so, but there you go.
;-)
Nothing else needs to be added. You hit the nail squarely on the head.
Jan
Scott Walker for GOP candidate. I hope he survives the feeding frenzy. I'd be willing to bet that the GOP won't support him like they didn't Cruz.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7s7dY6O_...
Using Allahbama as the model, I'd say she has all the qualifications, maybe more. Now if only she was black we wouldn't even need an election. She'd be perfect.
Whatsa matta wif you peeples?
The only vetting you will see is the party heads picking people they can blackmail and control.
These traitors don't even bother to check birth records once they have a loyal puppet.
http://clinton.com/cgi-bin/about/philoso... , I can honestly say that MY financial manager, Fisher Investments, would label that entire page as rampant bullshit and be laughing their heads off at the stupid assertions. Their 'philosophy' is a recipe for investment disaster.
sad.
I still favor requiring the CiC having had military service. One, you would have a more capable person in office, and two, it would keep the pretenders (nø names mentioned...) from ascending to the highest office in the greatest nation on the planet and turning it into Chop Sewage.
I agree on military experience being a VERY significant differentiator. Someone who has "walked a mile in their shoes" would better appreciate what can or cannot be done with respect to our military, its funding, etc.
What's scary is the candidate for VP? The jury is out on whether it will be ear corn or a cucumber...
There is no way she could put ol' "Wad o' bills" as veep - one, as VP he wouldn't be knowledgable to the info he would be as just her husband, and two, she knows it would kill her chances of success - he is a liability; even the most ardent supporter would pitch her like a dead skunk (OK, well, A=A, but her supporters apparently *like* dead skunks) if she took this loser, disaster of America, magnet of scandal with an IQ lower than Roscoe P. Coletrane as veep.
My guess is she would at a minimum put in Hari Kerry... tho the final choice (as are most things dealt with by the Party Commisariat) will no more be up to her as was partnering John McCain with Sarah Palin, and then filling her head with psychobabble to make sure he was not a contender.
If - god forbid, please, no - she somehow suckseeds Ø, I will have a GTFOOD party at the forge, and start planning for a rertreat somewhere far far away... I am thinking that Baja may well be too close (no offense, H&H) to escape the American Il Duca, or more precisely, "il dittatore in un tailleur pantalone"...
Lessee... Van Buren (eg Van Ruin) (democrat) was not... refused to annex Texas, (OK, not a bad thing), Centralized the treasury, Strained relations with France & Britain, causing his re-election failure in IIRC 1840. In fact (this stolen from Wiki), "his most lasting achievement was as a political organizer who built the modern Democratic Party"...
Let's see about the last 7 who have not, and their legacies......
Woodie Wilson - Thank you says the Fed.
Warren Harding - Tea(pot dome), anyone?
Calvin Coolidge - the exception, brought us into huge prosperity, AKA the "roaring 20's." Born on July 4th.
Cal Coolidge - Man, this is depression.
F.D. (Federal Dictator) Roosevelt - damned near made this the "People's Free socialist states of America". Got us into a HUGE war on foreign soil to pump industry with federal mandates to try to pull us out of the depression.
Bill Clinton - Really, you gotta ask abot ol' Billy Boy, his wife's idea of universal health care, and, well, a whole *wad* of controversy.
King Ø... I *know* I don't need to go there. Unless you hate our country, it's principles, and our constitution.
So... I respectfully disagree with your premise.
Honorable military service in a presidential candidate may be icing on the cake, but it isn't the whole cake and, IMHO, the whole cake better be well made. Military service may be a road to leadership, but it is not the only road nor is it a guarantee of high quality leadership. That's why I commented about John Kerry in my post. A snake with military service is still a snake and I will not vote for him/her.
I rationally disagree with the premise that all POTUS must have military experience. If you "feel" they should, that is your opinion and you are welcome to it and I will respect it.
On second thought, knowing "We the sheeple", who have been programmed to forget, I am not.
Whoever gets the most recorded votes, with NO OTHER qualification, is now the "Best President Ever".
And then, as before, only the law-abiding will follow the law.
That part is still the same.
Her implication is that a man doesn't care about school children, etc. I find that highly offensive. It actually makes me angry.
Just so happens that, as of Monday, I acquired a new coworker who used to be a "community organizer" for her on her previous campaign. Nice guy. We've had some interesting discussions already.
His name was Herman Cain.
I have a conspiracy theory about how Team Obama smeared to shoo-fly their greatest fear for a threat.
I would not be surprised if Geroge Soros was behind certain payoffs.
"In the 2004 United States presidential election, Chambers ran for Vice President on the Personal Choice Party ticket, a libertarian political party. She received a total of 946 votes. In the 2008 United States presidential election, she was again Charles Jay's running mate, this time as an alternate write-in candidate to his primary national Boston Tea Party running mate Thomas L. Knapp in the states of Arkansas, Hawaii, Louisiana, Nevada, New Mexico, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, and Utah.[45][46]"
Unfortunately she died in 2009, but since dead Dems vote, why can't a dead celeb run?
We'd get better quality candidates or those with buffoons whose only purpose was protecting the Prez would cause their ticket to be shunned.
The part about a candidate dying or otherwise being unable to serve was also in a Clancy book and pointed out the remaining candidate no matter how far behind would get an boost as the last thing you want is anyone's leftover VP.
The system is certainly skewed and in the wrong direction. Last thing we need is another Lyndon B for Butcher Johnson.
At a high level I have a few things I look for in a candidate.
* Political Experience
* Ambassador Experience
* Military Experience
* Economic Experience
* Small Government Philosophy
Above all of these is do they favor small government and freedom in their philosophical values? If they do not, I do not want them.
A green guy that has a basis of small government in their philosophical value system, and govern themselves from their values is someone I look for first and foremost.
A complete unknown that can show they have the base values of lets have the smallest government we can and not fall into anarchy is my first choice. Once they show that I want the other 4 disciplines above. The number one trait I would like is a small government philosophy, everything else is secondary to that.
Note that no where in the consideration is a woman or another protected class citizen. That kind of racial nonsense needs to be removed form our laws and our writing and our speech completely.
Perfect choice for the GOP.
Condi? Another looter. National security advisor and Secy of State. Anyone thinking that American security, reputation, and foreign afffairs improved during her tenure needs to go directly to an insane asylum. I would never send my child to Stanford if they think Condi should be teaching and molding young minds.
Government Party by any other name is still the Gumitup Party, Matters not if they are left wing of the left or the right wing of the left. Left is Left by any other name is never a rose - just a Coalition off Bi-Partisan political cross dressers.
.