12

Being called “Far Right” is like being called a witch in the middle ages

Posted by freedomforall 1 week ago to Politics
14 comments | Share | Flag

Excerpt:
"dictators like President Xi are rarely introduced as “the Far Left President Xi”. That would give the game away, wouldn’t it? There would be constant reminders of the dangers of going “too far left”."
SOURCE URL: https://joannenova.com.au/2025/01/being-called-far-right-is-like-being-called-a-witch-in-the-middle-ages/


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by mccannon01 6 days, 8 hours ago
    Nice little tidbit. Thanks for posting, FFA.

    It's all part of the left's double standard and word fog game to confuse us. I have NEVER heard any main stream broadcast or printed "news" item refer to anyone as a "far left extremist". A commenter noted, "Would you rather be far right or far wrong?", LOL!

    Interesting point I heard on the radio yesterday and that is the USA is the only place where red has been changed to mean "on the right" and blue "on the left". Red(s) has historically meant communist(s). Fog.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by 6 days, 3 hours ago
      The scum in D.C. have been doing this forever, taking 'liberal' which means
      in favor of individual liberty and using it as a tag for the most oppressive,
      invasive, anti-liberty gang of scumbags since the Soviet Union committed suicide.
      Only one thing makes any sense: D.C. NIFO
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by JohnRandALL 6 days, 3 hours ago
    In Canada, red is left, blue is right, opposite of here. I like to think of the two parties as the right living in reality, and the left in fantasy, ties in with Ayn Rand's objectivism, and realizing reality, A is A, not A can be B.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ Snezzy 5 days, 5 hours ago
      Can we please remember the idea behind "A is A"? It's not whether or or not A is B. It's whether or not A is "Not A".

      My horse is not "not a horse" at the same time and in the same respect. The same people who will say that "A is A" is either obvious or irrelevant will also tell you that the theft of your property is not theft, or that property is not property.

      What should one do with the appearance of a contradictory statement? It's right there in The Fountainhead. First three words.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ splumb 5 days, 5 hours ago
    Good article.

    It's time to fight fire with fire, gang.
    From now on, let's call them what they are.
    Every. Single. Time.

    Corrupt (insert name here)
    Communist (insert name here)
    Globalist (insert name here)
    And so forth.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Olduglycarl 6 days, 1 hour ago
    I don't think there is such a thing, maybe a couple of creatures but that's it.
    Far Right would be No control, No Government, No rules if the far left is for total control, Right?
    As you well know, we were meant to be slightly right of center meaning minimum control.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ rainman0720 5 days, 3 hours ago
    I've often offered that the lefties are so far to the left they think they're in the middle. Since they all think they're in the middle--aka, mainstream--everyone else must be far right.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by jconne 4 days, 16 hours ago
    The only useful response to all this nonsense is naming the ridiculousness of the left-right arbitrary usage. Then offer an alternative scale of human rights respecting vs disrespecting.

    That leads to a conversation about the what and the why.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo