- Hot
- New
- Categories...
- Producer's Lounge
- Producer's Vault
- The Gulch: Live! (New)
- Ask the Gulch!
- Going Galt
- Books
- Business
- Classifieds
- Culture
- Economics
- Education
- Entertainment
- Government
- History
- Humor
- Legislation
- Movies
- News
- Philosophy
- Pics
- Politics
- Science
- Technology
- Video
- The Gulch: Best of
- The Gulch: Bugs
- The Gulch: Feature Requests
- The Gulch: Featured Producers
- The Gulch: General
- The Gulch: Introductions
- The Gulch: Local
- The Gulch: Promotions
- Marketplace
- Members
- Store
- More...
And then there was the mysterious simultaneous stoppage of vote counting in four states at 0200 that was never explained. But Biden's vote count skyrocketed when they started counting again. Of course the left would quickly point out that all of the cases were thrown out by judges. What they failed to point out is that the judges refused to look at the evidence and just summarily dismissed the cases. Hmm.
Also, that NIFTY button that assigns all scanned ballots to ONE candidate (TBH, there is a reason for the feature. It lets you machine count WRITE IN ballots. That's what it is there for.) The SKETCHY part is that I WOULD have PRINTED a BOX of * around that number, INDICATING that feature was USED. But NOPE, Dominion tries not to even RECORD when someone uses this feature.
You wanna prevent 90% of ballot stuffing?
1) Only allow In person voting
2) Track the EXACT TIME the person signed in, who signed them in, and the keystrokes used to fine them.
3) Track the exact time of every BALLOT cast, when it is cast.
Simply plot, and find ANY time that there are more ballots scanned than Voters signed in.
Cross references with ANY batches of voters that were signed in "FASTER" than normal.
Because USUALLY they print extra ballots. Scan them in, when nobody is paying much attention (Project Veritas has videos). Then they tell the "crooked" worker up front, how many "random" voters to sign in. So they match at the end of the day.
Finding a random person is evident by the keystrokes used to select the person. usually page up/down, etc. Not based on a search, and not based on scanning the DL.
If we wanted to tighten things up, this is so simple and obvious... That's it's 100% clear... They do not want it.
Oh, and simply add a finger print scan for each voter as they register. A simple biometric. So if someone tries to SCAN people in who are not there (how dead voters vote)... Then they will have to fake a finger print scan.
Next, let the AI loose on on the finger print scans, and the SPEED at which voters were signed in.
FAKE voters are signed in faster.
Much Faster!
Never mind Fox lawyers. It's the boss on top who decides what is what for Fox.
I'm going to make up voting numbers to demonstrate what I saw just one whole time on Fox TV News. A camera was trained on a Dominion monitor due to suspicion that vote tallies were being switched between candidates.
I saw Trump votes somewhere state 10,8765 and Biden votes state 5,8989
Then as quick as the blink or an eye I saw the screen switch Trump 5,8989 Biden 10,8765
This happened early during the voting. I watch Fox a lot and I never saw that video again and no one ever talked about it.
I don't remember what state or city that screen was at and I made up the numbers because I don't recall what they were either.
This was my first hint that the election was being rigged.