NPR has been a ultra left biased cat box for decades.

100%. I’ve been harping on this for a while now. They are re taking OUR MONEY and using it to pay themselves for this blatant partisan action!

No matter what time you listen, they are all about NOTHING but getting rid of our President, and it burns my butt that OUR money is going toward this!

More of the swamp. A self-licking ice cream cone.

Started by communist, LBJ, and almost died in 1983. Should have killed it then.

Shut them down, along with 75% of other government agencies.

Since NPR chooses to act as a propaganda instrument for the Democrat Party, they for being just another Fake News organization can keep their slimy hands out of all We The People's taxpaying pockets.

I have found the commentators on NPR to be horribly conceited and often devoid of self-awareness.

Recently, there was a story reported regarding deaths in New York due to C19 -- essentially, many died state hospitals while there were beds open in private hospitals. The two commentators agreed that there was such a simple solution to that problem and it would have saved those lives. They engaged in a group hug, and did not mention the solution since it would have been so obvious. Of course, if they were in charge, they would have forced the private hospital to take in C19 patients from the state hospital.

These statists are so blinded by their conceit that they would use force to spend other peoples' money. This theme has been repeated over the 20+ years that I have listened to NPR as one of my "news" sources. There have been times when I was so infuriated by their magnanimous virtue-signaling, that I have avoided their programming for up to a year at a time. Then, I dial them in just to see what they've been up to; no surprise, their statist slant is ever the more disgusting.

No NPR period except as a function of national emergency communications.

OR...

I'd totally support four NPR channels with the following:
1) unedited coverage of the Senate, including public hearings and debates and committee sessions.
2) unedited coverage of the House, including public hearings and debates and committee sessions.
3) unedited coverage of oral arguments in Supreme Court cases as well as complete readings of judicial rulings.
4) Press conferences with members of the White House

Blatantly partisan. That behavior has no place in news reporting.

First time posting.
Two things:
1. Even if NPR, and PBS for that matter, always broadcasted news that only promoted our viewpoint, it shouldn't be tax-supported. Why wait until they tick you off to demand that they be cut off from government funding?
2. A quick web search shows that NPR gets only 2% of its funding from the federal government. States legislatures also contribute. But the majority comes from private donations.

Although I agree that the government shouldn't contribute tax revenues to NPR and PBS, it won't matter much if they are cut off.

Agree completely. Also PBS and and the "arts" groups.

NPR was created by the left at a time when MSM and newspapers weren't blatantly left or Democrat leaning, and they've never deviated from their mission of moving the country's view of itself as far to the left as they can. Both NPR and PBS should be de-funded of taxpayer money to rely on their supporters for funding. Or they can sell advertising to Twitter, Google and Facebook if those entities don't see them as competitors.

I absolutely despise the fact that this is nothing more than a ploy to forcefully rob me and use my money to support the left wing of the DNC. Now THAT is deplorable!

Absolutely, gov't sponsored media is something that's long outlived its usefulness, especially since it has become an organ for gov't propaganda.

NPR -- aka mooching thugs.

So we think that we can create parasitic entities like NPR and the NOT have them be biased toward parasitic ideas and candidates?

If, they were pro-Trump, should they get public money?