Who Can You Trust?
Do politicians lie to you? Most Gulchers will, I think, will agree that they do.A better question may be, ;Do politicians ever tell you the truth? I have discovered that the people are lied to primarily in order to keep the liar or liars in office. They may use excuses such as it's for the good of the country, or that it may not look good, but in the long run, it's a matter of something bad that will eventually be a good outcome. For example, the two world wars.In both cases the USA had decided to be neutral. Everyone knew that the neutrality depended largely on the combatants leaving America alone. If the USA was attacked, it would respond by by joining the side that didn't attack them. In both WW1 and WW2 the antagonist was comprised of Germany and others who faced off against the allies who were made up of Britain and France Japan, was the powerhouse who allied themselves with Germany.So, without writing an entire history book, here's what was told to the American people. In WW1 The land war had devolved into trench warfare which was a stalemate. It amounted to who could keep their armies supplied with munitions and supplemental materials . Germany was in a better position to do so as Britain needed to get it's supplies mostly from the USA. British ships carrying war materials from America became the target of German submarines. The Germans managed to sink most of British shipping so they started hiding war materials on American ships. Eventually, the Germans got wise to this and issued warnings to America that if American ships or British ships carrying Americans and hiding war cargo for England would become legitimate targets of war,So now comes the british ship The Lusitania. A huge four stack liner with four giant turbines that was the fastest thing afloat in those times. She was nicknamed "The Greyhound." The forward cabins were scooped out and in their place were water tight bins filled with guncotton. A highly inflammable chemical needed for use with arms such as cannons.
When the Lusitania sailed from the USA to England, the Germans knew about the illicit cargo.Four submarines were sent after the Greyhounf which was Lusitania's nickname and at the peril of their lives the Germans warned The Lusitania that if they didn't turn around and off-load their armaments they would be fired upon. The sleek beautiful ship paid no attention. Even though it contained over 100 Americans it was also filled with women and children. Over a thousand of them.
In 1941, the Japanese needed war materials, and like the England of 1915, got it's material from America. Once America cut them off they decided to punish America and get what they needed by threatening further punishment. They attacked the American Fleet at Pearl Harbor, Hawaii and decimated.it.In the case of the Luisitania, First Lord of the Amiralty,Winston Churchill and American soon-to-be-sec. of state Robert Lansing were complicit in maneuvering the slaughter. In the case of Pearl Harbor, our "Good pal" Winnie was once again "Saving" England at the expense of hundreds of lives. The press was told that the Lusitania was attacked without warning and that the women and children escaping in lifeboats were shot by Germans from the submarines as they sat helpless in their wooden boats.Which was a complete fabrication. In the case of Pearl harbor, Churchill and President Franklin D. Roosevelt Knew 10 months in advance of the planned attack.
In both cases, both attacks could have been avoided if the best interests o the people were truly put in first place.
Those were the biggest lies I could think of. You can multiply those by the hundreds, or perhaps thousands of lies told by the "Elites" to us poor ignorant common folks.So, if your first impression is that you're being lied to, you are probably right..
When the Lusitania sailed from the USA to England, the Germans knew about the illicit cargo.Four submarines were sent after the Greyhounf which was Lusitania's nickname and at the peril of their lives the Germans warned The Lusitania that if they didn't turn around and off-load their armaments they would be fired upon. The sleek beautiful ship paid no attention. Even though it contained over 100 Americans it was also filled with women and children. Over a thousand of them.
In 1941, the Japanese needed war materials, and like the England of 1915, got it's material from America. Once America cut them off they decided to punish America and get what they needed by threatening further punishment. They attacked the American Fleet at Pearl Harbor, Hawaii and decimated.it.In the case of the Luisitania, First Lord of the Amiralty,Winston Churchill and American soon-to-be-sec. of state Robert Lansing were complicit in maneuvering the slaughter. In the case of Pearl Harbor, our "Good pal" Winnie was once again "Saving" England at the expense of hundreds of lives. The press was told that the Lusitania was attacked without warning and that the women and children escaping in lifeboats were shot by Germans from the submarines as they sat helpless in their wooden boats.Which was a complete fabrication. In the case of Pearl harbor, Churchill and President Franklin D. Roosevelt Knew 10 months in advance of the planned attack.
In both cases, both attacks could have been avoided if the best interests o the people were truly put in first place.
Those were the biggest lies I could think of. You can multiply those by the hundreds, or perhaps thousands of lies told by the "Elites" to us poor ignorant common folks.So, if your first impression is that you're being lied to, you are probably right..
Ironically, Tojo favored the Japanese army plans to pour more effort into subduing China, with an invasion of the USSR to follow, since many Siberian troops had been sent West to fight the Nazi invasion. There was little favor in a naval battle with the largest fleet in the world, but FDR's moves had forced them to invade territories held by US allies. If the Pearl Harbor attack had carried out the third strike as originally planned, and destroyed our naval fuel supplies, we could have been kept out of the fight for nearly two years. Lucky for us, the cautious Admiral Nagumo was unsettled when his pilots reported no aircraft carriers in Pearl Harbor, and feared that if he didn't withdraw, those carriers could find and destroy his entire force.
Another connivance FDR was engaged in was to support the return of our European allies to their Southeast Asian colonies. That had an impact that helped start the Vietnam conflict. Ho Chi Minh's partisans worked with our OSS in fighting the Japanese, and were promised that the US would not support the recolonization of their territory. While a communist, the Vietnamese leader did not like the idea of becoming a subject of either the USSR or China, and could have become the "Tito of the East," independent like the Yugoslav leader. Unfortunately, the lie he was told destroyed any friendly thoughts he had about the US, and made him seek aid from the USSR.
The carriers- Yes the carriers were not in port. Do you have any background on that? Was it all of them, when moved, for what reason- another mission, who gave the instruction? Would it have been normal for all the carriers based at Pearl Harbor to move out at the same time?
Some writers mistakenly include the USS Saratoga as one of the carriers based at Pearl, but it was based out of the West coast, and was in San Diego when the attack happened.
In America, we turned from cars to jeeps and tanks. In Japan they turned from tanks and planes to cars. There's an interesting analogy somewhere there. As Trump continues to build up our military, the advances in weaponry is jaw dropping. A ship the size of a destroyer carries firepower that is as powerful as a WW2 battleship, a cannon fires shells as fast as the rounds of a machine gun, not to mention lasers and things that I can look at, and know they are a weapon but can't tell you what they do. We've come a far cry from the Colt six-shooter when Alan Ladd blew Jack Palance away in "Shane." And the hand cranked Gatling gun was high Tech..
The current Toyota logo is from 1989. It is described by the company with the usual pyscho-social guff, I have seen no reference to helmets.
etc.
After the war Japan, its economy, its industry were in a bad way, bombed, destroyed, and short of skills.
Some very curious developments then took place. In a decade, industry was back up, in another decade a giant motor industry was rising. It broke a few motor industry traditions, they produced vehicles that a buying public would want. They did not follow the Italian and old English (Ferrari, Morgan, AstonMartin) of design with engineering passion, nor the Germans for making the best and price will follow, nor some of the UK and US companies that would produce and price as per market research outfits told them. They designed, made, and built vehicles that buyers saw they could afford, that soon earned a reputation for quality, reliability and performance, all this while customers recommended the brand and bought the same brand again in a few years time.
A crucial part of that was manufacturing. In 1951, Japan called in an expert in statistical quality control, WE Deming an American engineer.
US industry had no use for these ideas then, it thought. In Japan he toured and lectured, they bowed, they sat at his feet and absorbed. His ideas were taken up with relish, notably in motor vehicle, electrical and electronic industries. Many call it- the Toyota Production System.
I was in the belief that it was the other way around. The US threatened oil supply for Japan and they had to act to prevent that.
How did the US force Japan?
I don't know if Pearl Harbour was fake news, but the Japanese Navy Admiral and the fighter pilot seemed to have been hell bent to kill Americans.
https://archive.org/details/dayofdece...
I knew that intelligence intercepted Japanese code about PH and that FDR did nothing.
I haven't read the book yet, but how was that "forcing Japan" into the war?
To my understanding the Japanese was hell-bent to drag the US in.
Request to Japan- I'm getting tired of haranguings from Hollywood celebrities, so how about taking on motion pics?
I am not sure about FDR, though.
His kowtowing to Stalin and letting him take half of Europe as slaves under communist rule takes all the glory off of him.
Eisenhauer was not much better, either.
He was too much concerned about "image" of holding together the Alliance, and closing his eyes to Stalin's dictatorial instincts.
He also said that his tax cut was good for small business. NOT TRUE. Tax rates for business used to be 15% up to $50k in profits, and something like 35% after that. NOW, its 21% on ALL income. That means for small businesses making 50k or less, their TAX WENT UP.
Another Lie from Trump. Of course, the other politicians lie ALL the time, so Trump is better than they are, but....
I think except for a few lies, trump has been better than any democrat. That said, he sticks to the lie that the Chinese pay for his tariffs
The example of Pearl Harbor was widely known and discussed in the news at that time. The truth was covered up by the media because war is the health of the state, and the media knew that they would be silenced and closed down if they didn't fall in line as instructed. My grandfather opened my eyes about it when I was a teenager and later I read accounts of the events on my own that supported what he told me. (Grandfather had 2 sons who risked their lives in WW2 in the Pacific.)
I would add the example of the "Civil War". Everything we know about the reason for that war is a fraud and the participants that we were taught were "heroes", in fact, were war criminals. Lincoln jailed everyone who opposed him and tried to have the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court arrested for pointing that Lincoln's actions were the unconstitutional actions of a dictator. All of this has been covered up in falsified "history".
We are raised and indoctrinated in government schools to trust government and not trust the free market. We are taught the lie that anyone who is successful in private business is a thief and only government politicians should be trusted to protect us from the free market sharks.
Public schools are the first and worst instance of fake news in existence.
Trust no one in government. Talk is cheap.
I never understood why the north had to destroy the south for just wanting to secede from the union. Makes no sense to me. How could that be right?
The facts are that the south seceded because the north increased tariffs more than double and the tariffs were overwhelmingly paid by southerners, while the taxes were being spent to aid northern industry- who supported Lincoln's election.
A few weeks before the action at Ft Sumter almost all northern newspapers were against war, but as soon as it became clear that the south would pursue a policy of free trade, the media turned to favoring war and blaming the south causing it. In fact the elite in NY were at fault for everything because they insisted on higher taxes on the south to benefit themselves. Fort Sumter was mentioned as an unimportant fort and not worth fighting for ... until it was exposed that without it the elite in NY would not receive any tariffs. Fort Sumter's position was to be able to prevent any shipping to travel through the largest Atlantic harbor in the south. It was valuable only as a way to collect taxes and that was why to the south it represented the freedom from taxation by a foreign power.
Like the American Revolution, the secession was for freedom, not for slavery. Federal laws were in place to continue to allow slavery in the south; it was not threatened at all. The war was entirely about the north enslaving the production of the south through taxation. Lincoln was a war criminal by the standards of that time and by the standards of today.
But those advantages are quickly turned into disadvantages in a collectivist society. An example is that it’s a lot of work and difficulty living alone in the woods or on a farm. But if the people around are thieves, it’s worse than being alone. I fear we are. Reaching a tipping point in this culture with the rise of socialism
Not only did that not happen, the fear is a total of 8 years of anti progressive policies and conservative Supreme Court picks could put a long lasting dent in the progressive movement.
Also, trump is upsetting the security of the bureaucrats Obama put in place, and they are trying anything to dump trump
Hopefully trump gets re elected. That would give us 4 more years to keep at least most progressive policies in check
What a great line.
So...who do I trust?..it's a pretty short list and none are in politics nor government...each instance is a separate trial of judgement.