I could have posted the New Yellow Times article on this topic, but it was blatantly biased and presented again all the same false rubbish that the NYT brainwashed statist urinalists have foisted on the public repeatedly.
Despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary the NYT continues the manipulative, false narrative about human contribution to CC.

Even the Daily Mail, or writer Emily Goodwin, has a climate alarmist view in this article.

There is no sensible description of William Happer, the Princeton prof. leading the panel. He has produced the caliber of work that is of Nobel winning standard.

There is no mention of Turner, Soros, Steyer and gang who are the world's richest but a billionaire is named as 'ultra-conservative' solely due to opposing climate alarmism.

Patrick Moore, who was identified by Fox News as a co-founder of Green Peace - although the organization said that is incorrect.
Parick Moore is one of the founders of Greenpeace who left when the ideology of climate alarmism took over. The denial of his role and work by the current Greenpeace bosses, records, texts and photos altered, is textbook Stalinism.

Losses by the US economy- could lose etc. No mention of the certain losses if nonsense ideology is followed.

So, the article is bigoted, like many such, some truth can be got by careful reading. It is good to see the desperate attempts to promote "the science", but it is fraud. Thanks to ffa for posting.

In order to fit their narrative, leftists have actively excluded a lot of facts, theories and people from their climate science. The Nazis had something called, German science. German science was their “true” science that was actively kept “pure”, without all those conflicting influences by “unpure” facts, theories or people, such as by the Jew Albert Einstein.

The fact is that in its current leftist bent state, climate science is so corrupted that isn’t actual science.

I got a big laugh recently when watching the pilot episode (in 1995) of the tv series Sliders.
The subtle propaganda was pushing the global cooling "science" ;^)

It is not a science.

First thing you observe is the left claims there is "consensus" in scientists' findings.

Science is not about consensus. To the contrary, it is about critical thinking by challenging accepted views and set ideas.

Something college graduates sorely lack when taking their diploma to the next job.

Global warming is the next best vehicle for the left to exert control over vast masses of the population.

Al Gore made millions on it, buying a mansion in Mendocino County for $8 million.

Biden challenged him recently, claiming it was him who started the global warming crusade. Another area where the swamp is competing for "leadership".

Climate Change crusaders are no different than the Ancient Alien believers. Turn their beliefs into a religion!

All of the models that rely on projections of carbon dioxide fail validation, based on moving the start date back a century to see if they correctly model current conditions, and they do not. Models based on sun cycles pass validation, and they predict we're going to be entering a cooling cycle.

Climate changers will often declare that 97% of climate scientists support global warming, but that figure is based on a flawed poll. The poll was sent to 3,000 scientists who had peer reviewed papers on climate change. After review, the pollsters discovered only about 120 of those papers even addressed human contributions to climate change, and of those, only 79 responded, with 75 agreeing that human actions were the main cause of climate change. So the declaration of 97% is based on the opinions of 75 scientists as representative of all climate scientists. By comparison, over 31,000 climate scientists signed a letter to the UN, saying that the UN's IPCC report greatly exaggerated the rate of climate change, and was unconvincing in its argument that draconian changes were absolutely necessary to prevent disaster.

Gotta love the bias in the article. They start from the assumption that climate change is "settled science" and fact, when nothing could be further from the truth. We don't understand nearly as much about climate as we think we do but that doesn't matter because it isn't about science but the ideology of global control and tyranny. It's #science vs science.

IMHO, all this hot climate hysteria needs a bucket of cold water tossed on it to bring it back to reality. Trump might be just the right guy needed at the cold spring pump to fill the bucket!

The computerized extrapolations of suppositions of wild ass guesses being called "science" needs a good slap to reality. I've been writing code since 1972 and spent decades in the process controls field and some of the so called modeling "data that doesn't lie" being presented by these so called scientists and "Urinalists" (thanks for that one FFA!) is absurdly appalling.

When you read this global warming hysteria just keep in mind the multi-billion dollar taxpayer funded weather forecasting service can't accurately get it right for next week, so what makes all these hysterical idiots think the forecast for the next decade is spot on? Actually, the decade of the dastardly date of doom has shifted into the future many times in my lifetime and the New Yellow Times (Thanks again, FFA!) has just shifted it to 2040 in spite of the all seeing bartender calling for 2032. Whatever...

Donald.. just keep speaking the truth. don't listen to your advisor who want you to shut up for political reasons.

That headline made me laugh. But...honestly, an attack on carbon is an attack on life. We're carbon-based beings.

That tongue twister almost killed me! I can't quit laughing at what I even wrote!

He also needs to ramp up responsible conversations on magnetic reversals. It's a much more important conversation.

Maybe declassify knowledge of all the tunnels and underground facilities we keep hearing about also.

If Conscious Humans are to survive the next earthly catastrophe we have to make sure the extreme left and all the other unwashed idiots do not survive. It is my opinion, we cannot fix stupid and the last thing mankind needs is a lot of dead weight holding us back from a civilizational restart.

Okay guys! What's a 'urinalists'? Do you mean 'uninanalysist?' Is there such a thing?