Relating altruism to lack of decision making
I understand that the looters & moochers in AS were driven by a false valuation of altruism, but another theme is inability or unwillingness to think or make decisions. I'm just not sure how they're connected. The looters were decisive enough when it came to enacting 10-289, or developing Project X, and all their other oppressive laws. Why were the moochers seemingly devoid of any ability to make decisions at all, and how does that connect to their warped view of altruism?
Moochers willingly give up their rights in exchange for altruism from their looter oppressors.
https://www.floridatoday.com/story/ne...
Not such a bad deal..
But, give up free speech for ever for a free pizza every day?
I may be a pessimist but many would take that deal.
Another way to sum it up is using a line from the movie Jurassic Park: "Yeah, but your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could, they didn't stop to think if they should."
We see discussion in other recent threads here about the bad business behavior of big-tech, often founded and still run by tech geniuses. The fact is that high IQ, a key to solving defined problems such as in IQ tests, is not related to good sense which is needed to solve large messy poorly defined problems.
In AS the leading looters seldom made bad decisions (at least in the short term) for themselves but were big on moral posturing, virtue signalling, the skill of appearing to be caring and moral but not making any serious sacrifice themselves. There are sufficient of the sheeple, the followers, who are willing to do that, to save the planet, to give everyone a home, etc.
Consider the Occupy Wall Stree crowd and the current crop of Democrat Socialists. Gimme, gimme, gimme.
They were only altruist where the people are concerned but not with themselves...not conscious, no conscience, therefore, not human.