SHE’S BACK! Hillary Clinton Says Russia ‘SUCCEEDED’ in Stealing 2016 Election

Posted by mminnick 5 years, 6 months ago to Politics
19 comments | Share | Flag

"Twice-failed presidential candidate Hillary Clinton continued her worldwide excuses tour Wednesday night; saying Russian interference in the 2016 race for the White House “succeeded” in electing Donald Trump.
“They had an objective to sew discord and divisiveness within our society at large and to help Donald Trump. And they succeeded,” Clinton told MSNBC News."
Hillary materially assisted the Russians in their effort either by design or stupidity. [I vote for Stupidity.]

"Since her stunning defeat to DonaldSays Russia ‘SUCCEEDED’ in Stealing 2016 Election Trump in 2016, Clinton has blamed a wide range of causes for her electoral disaster; including Russia, Barack Obama, Bernie Sanders, the New York Times, racism, sexism, the electoral college, the DNC, Facebook, Google, the FBI, James Comey, and more"
She doen't mention she ran a really bad campaign paying minimal or no attention to Pennsylvania, Michagin, Wisconsin, Iowa Missouri and North Carolina. Loosing those had a huge impact on her election palns. It cost ther the election.
SOURCE URL: https://hannity.com/media-room/shes-back-hillary-clinton-says-russia-succeeded-in-stealing-2016-election/


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by freedomforall 5 years, 6 months ago
    "sew discord and divisiveness within our society " As usual, a statist liberal accuses others of the actions they commit themselves.
    Everybody is at fault but Hitlery for her defeat.
    I would love to take credit for it, but there are 50 million other voters who are the real heroes.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ Suzanne43 5 years, 6 months ago
      Hillary, the residence witch, is quoted as saying that she lives in our prisdident's head. Last night on Fox, Greg Gutfeld quipped that that was the only way that she was going to live in the White House. Actually, she needs to live in a federal prison.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ 25n56il4 5 years, 6 months ago
    Out of the mouths of babes!. My daughter in law (who isn't politically inclined) commented the Democrats remind her of disgruntled employees. She added, you have to fire them!
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by exceller 5 years, 6 months ago
    It beats me how is it possible that characters like this hag and Comey are in the position to spew their venom with no accountability?

    Bot are guilty as sin but live free and continue their subversive activities.

    Maybe they think they have nothing to lose and this their final death cry.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by 5 years, 6 months ago
    Several or=f Mark Levin's book talk to this very point. Unfortunately I can't lay may hads on them right now. they address the statist view on this subject as clearly as I've seen. I'll try to get citations for you.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Stormi 5 years, 6 months ago
    She just cannot believe she handed over all that uranium to Russia, as she took the payoff to the bank, and they did not help her get elected. She allowed Russia or China to have access via hack of her crappy computer at home. She promised people she would make them crimnals if the discussed global warming faults. She promised to censor any political discussions on the Internet. She sowed seeds of racial, gender and econmic dissent from the time she was First Lady and using the Saul Alinsky Rules for Radical methods. She lied about Benghazi to protect her Gadaffi gold and weapons trek across there, and let people die. She lied about her brain injury in the crash on an Iran airstrip. No, Russia did not defeat her, Trump did not defeat her, it was her gift to herself, We knew too much who she was, and that was her downfall.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by NealS 5 years, 6 months ago
    Keep it up Hillary, soon you'll be able to have a captive audience, in prison. She might have been able to get away with her "indiscretions" had she just gone away, and vanished from politics. Now, she's making it mandatory, they can/will just investigate the "stealing of the election" and find the real truths.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by ycandrea 5 years, 6 months ago
    I just do not understand what the big deal is. Even if it was Russia who leaked it to Wikileaks, it was just the truth. Voter have a right to know the truth.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ allosaur 5 years, 6 months ago
    Today on the Fox News page, The Evil Hag is shown warning other Dem candidates they can also have their election stolen no matter how great a campaign they ran.
    Is Cackles trying to make others believe she ran a great campaign? Bwahaha! Yeah!
    Maybe it's just me, but me dino finds it easier to believe she books flights on broomsticks!
    https://www.foxnews.com/politics/hill...
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • -4
    Posted by CircuitGuy 5 years, 6 months ago
    She clearly did not say that. She said "[Russia] had an objective to sew discord and divisiveness within our society at large and to help Donald Trump. And they succeeded." That's totally true. They wanted to help anyone who undermined US institutions, including Bernie Sanders. Hillary Clinton is right to single out President Trump because unlike Sanders he actually won. I don't think Russia thought Sanders or Trump would win. They wanted them to lose and have many Americans angry and distrustful of our institutions. I believe it's just good fortune for the Russians that one of their candidates won and continued trashing US institutions. Hillary stated the real problem, one we're ignoring.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by ewv 5 years, 6 months ago
      The Russians did not succeed in helping Trump. Russians have been trying to influence elections for a century and there was no good reason for Clinton to link "sew discord" with "help Donald Trump", clearly implying they influenced the outcome of the election. It is also hypocritical: The Democrat's (including the media) Alinskyite smear campaign and manipulation of "investigation" and its interpretation for political purposes since the election has been far worse than anything the Russians did. Clinton's own political paranoia carrying on over two years after the election is part of it.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by CircuitGuy 5 years, 6 months ago
        "The Russians did not succeed in helping Trump. "
        Are you responding to something I said? I'm saying it has only the most tangential relationship to the issue of helping particular candidates. My post says "[Russia] wanted [Trump and Sanders] to lose," not because they cared about the election or who won, but rather because they wanted to undermine the US.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by ewv 5 years, 6 months ago
          I responded to your denial ("She clearly did not say that") that Clinton blamed her loss to Trump on the Russians (the topic of the thread). Her statement included "and help Donald Trump. And they succeeded". That is irrelevant to the Russians' century old attempts to cause chaos with disinformation and is why people see her continuing to blame her loss to Trump on the Russians and everything else other than her own candidacy and campaign.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
          • -1
            Posted by CircuitGuy 5 years, 6 months ago
            " that Clinton blamed her loss to Trump on the Russians (the topic of the thread). Her statement included "and help Donald Trump. And they succeeded"."
            Her statement is factually correct and not focused on her loss.
            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ WilliamShipley 5 years, 6 months ago
      I seriously doubt the Russian 'interference' had much impact at all. It did show that the DNC plotted against Bernie which might have gotten some Bernie fans to vote for Stein.

      Nations do try to influence each other. Obama was in Britain threatening them that they would be "at the back of the line" if they voted for Brexit. (and Trump was on the other side).

      I'm still not convinced that the Wikileaks actually did come from the Russians, the alternative suggestion that it came from a DNC staffer who was a Bernie fan and was pissed off is certainly credible and explains the focus. If you are really paranoid, you can think it's Seth Rich .

      The illegal act with the biggest impact on the 2016 election was the NBC's released of an illegal recording of a private conversation. California law is pretty strict on recording people without them being aware.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by CircuitGuy 5 years, 6 months ago
        "I seriously doubt the Russian 'interference' had much impact at all."
        I am not clear how much impact on our discourse it has. I use the present tense b/c it has not stopped. It's not about an election, and it's not about getting preferred candidates elected. It's about undermining America. They ran propaganda about Native American issues, racism, and vaccines. They orchestrated protests against President Trump and counter protests.

        President Trump has his staunchest critics act as if it's all about the legitimacy of Trump's presidency. Making it about legitimacy plays right into their hands. They aren't trying to get particular candidates elected. They just want to undermine America.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo