He is so stupid that it actually makes me angry. I have a physical reaction to the stuff he says. Dear gawd...how in the hell does a guy like this have a job, let alone be an elected official.

I'm sorry...But, sometimes stupidity is downright offensive it's so deep...

To quote Mr. Bugs Bunny, “What a maroon!”

Perhaps each member of Congress should be sent a copy of the Constitution. Perhaps the Heritage Foundation could deliver them in person to make sure the staff didn't intercept them.

There were several tweets yesterday and today about this topic. The people tweeting pointed out that Man or Men was never mentioned in the Constitution either. The terms used were Person, People and Citizen. No gender attached.
Note: All of the tweets I saw were from WOMEN.

Doesn't 'We The People" cover women? I always thought it did? Do you think we need to rewrite it? Really. I am not THAT sensitive!

As a female, I get sick of the Dems and their pandering to race, gender, and sexual persuasion.
My dad taught me to go with facts, and be prepared to compete in the business world on the basis of ability, not some gender difference. That means, when someone want s my vote, show me the programs, reasons, and fiscal data. Don't try to manipulate me, Mr. Swahwell, that is demeaning and it makde me angry.

I think it is nor fair that men can not bear children.

Raving lunatic.

What a maroon!

Getting upset over that?! When is somebody going to get some sense?--Yes, women were oppressed in the past; but the 14th, and the 19th Amendments were passed, and women can be equal before the law. We need to get out of this identity politics, and have recognition of individual rights. (And, by the way, I am a woman).

I still say it's hard to believe that a party so obsessed with veneer and genitalia is able to wield so much power in the Republic.

The only real relevance of the Equal Rights Amendment to today's world, IMO, is that the courts ought to interpret its failure as meaning the states would never have ratified the 14th if it had been intended to include gender equality -- and therefore it does not.

Anyone notice that “woman” does not appear anywhere in the Communist Manifesto yet “man” appears quite a number of times.

Me dino getting tired of all the empty-headed squeaks uttered by these libtarded swamp rats out to awe
the voting bobble-heads who prop up these clueless clowns as some kinda ooo-weee great thinkers.

I can hardly wait to get up in the morning and see what new person is announcing for the Presidency. This is a first in my lifetime! In the past some credentials were required. At least a brain was necessary. Not so anymore evidently.

Yeay California!!!

This is a wonderful problem to have. We have someone indignant that women's rights isn't in the US Constitution. The whole idea of a government based on Enlightenment ideas probably seemed like a pipe dream at the time. Only now, after it's become the model for governments everywhere, do we have the luxury to be indignant that it didn't bring liberty to more people sooner.

Then we have people indignant that Swalwell's indignant because the Constitution didn't mention the word man and therefore didn't codify the lack of liberty that existed at the time.

I suspect even Mary Wollstoncraft, one of the founders of feminism, would have been confused by this discussion if she observed it at the time when the US Constitution was ratified. Not only did the US succeed, their second attempt at a constitution succeeds, they become a regional power, then a superpower and model for nation states everywhere. Americans 200 years (after 1788) will struggled to understand why they didn't do the "obvious" thing and include ideas from A Vindication of the Rights of Women in the Constitution.

Equality seems so obvious to me, even I can wonder why they didn't just go the next obvious step in the 18th Century. We live in an amazing time for liberty.