Kamala Harris wants your firearms
Posted by Dobrien 5 years, 9 months ago to Legislation
Kamala Harris Wants To Use Extreme Measures To Force Gun Control
Posted at 10:00 am on January 30, 2019 by Tom Knighton
This from a Beeatchwho would not meet an Angel Mom.
Kamala Harris is not someone any of us will mistake for a gun rights proponent. The extremely progressive California politician has made her liberal bonafides apparent for anyone who cares to look. More than that, though, now that she’s announced her intention to run for president, she’s going to make them even more apparent.
Part of that is a discussion of gun control, but she seems to think that emotion should sway the debate. When it doesn’t, though, she has other ideas [empahsis mine]:
Harris shamed Congress for not introducing a bill following a 2011 assassination attempt on Arizona Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords. Giffords was shot in the head and 6 innocent bystanders were fatally shot.Harris slammed Giffords colleagues, saying, “The people who work with her every day, who know her — you know, we have colleagues. We know them. We know their children. We break bread. We share holiday moments with them. The people who knew her didn’t act.”
Senator Harris became even more impassioned while discussing the inaction by congress following the 2012 Sandy Hook elementary school shooting that took the lives of 20 children between the ages 6 and 7. She said, “I think somebody should have required all those members of Congress to go in a room, in a locked room, no press, nobody else, and look at the autopsy photographs of those babies.” She added, “And then you vote your conscience.”Senator Harris’s response resonated with many viewers, with one person tweeting “Truly blown away by the answer that Kamala Harris just gave on gun violence.”
Yeah, it blows me away too, but for a completely different reason.
Harris is here explicitly saying that if you disagree with her, you should be forced to sit and look at autopsy photos of small children until you do. Really? Does she really want to try that? Because I know what the counter will be. “Sure. Let’s do that with abortion.”
I don’t think she’d enjoy that very much, now would she?
Here’s the problem, though. Harris is arguing that her opponents should be punished for not capitulating with the desires of her party. If the Democrats think something is the answer and Republicans disagree, she’s already shown she’s willing to somehow make them do something until they capitulate.
In other words, her answer to disagreement is to use force.
I’m curious where else she would try and use force to make people change their minds. I seem to remember a concept where people would be herded into and shown things until their thinking changed. It wasn’t education, per se, but a kind of…well…reeducation, I suppose. Reeducation camps. Yeah, that’s it.
Is Harris trying to justify herding her opponents into reeducation camps until the grasp the supposed Utopian glory of gun control?
I’d like to believe that Harris’s stomach would turn at the suggestion of such a thing on American soil, but just how far of a leap is it from making lawmakers look at a stimulus to try and change their minds to doing something very similar to ordinary Americans?
To Kamala Harris, please understand that’s a terrifying concept. You need to back the hell off from that line of argument and retract that kind of thing immediately. You need to be very clear about how you wish to do no such thing to Americans, be they members of Congress or anyone else.
No one should be forced to do anything simply because they disagree with Democrats on something.
As it stands, people like you are why people like me have guns and won’t be giving them up any time soon. After all, I’m pretty sure that if people were to get herded into camps, I’d be among the first to be rounded up, but I’ll tell you one thing.
I ain’t going
Posted at 10:00 am on January 30, 2019 by Tom Knighton
This from a Beeatchwho would not meet an Angel Mom.
Kamala Harris is not someone any of us will mistake for a gun rights proponent. The extremely progressive California politician has made her liberal bonafides apparent for anyone who cares to look. More than that, though, now that she’s announced her intention to run for president, she’s going to make them even more apparent.
Part of that is a discussion of gun control, but she seems to think that emotion should sway the debate. When it doesn’t, though, she has other ideas [empahsis mine]:
Harris shamed Congress for not introducing a bill following a 2011 assassination attempt on Arizona Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords. Giffords was shot in the head and 6 innocent bystanders were fatally shot.Harris slammed Giffords colleagues, saying, “The people who work with her every day, who know her — you know, we have colleagues. We know them. We know their children. We break bread. We share holiday moments with them. The people who knew her didn’t act.”
Senator Harris became even more impassioned while discussing the inaction by congress following the 2012 Sandy Hook elementary school shooting that took the lives of 20 children between the ages 6 and 7. She said, “I think somebody should have required all those members of Congress to go in a room, in a locked room, no press, nobody else, and look at the autopsy photographs of those babies.” She added, “And then you vote your conscience.”Senator Harris’s response resonated with many viewers, with one person tweeting “Truly blown away by the answer that Kamala Harris just gave on gun violence.”
Yeah, it blows me away too, but for a completely different reason.
Harris is here explicitly saying that if you disagree with her, you should be forced to sit and look at autopsy photos of small children until you do. Really? Does she really want to try that? Because I know what the counter will be. “Sure. Let’s do that with abortion.”
I don’t think she’d enjoy that very much, now would she?
Here’s the problem, though. Harris is arguing that her opponents should be punished for not capitulating with the desires of her party. If the Democrats think something is the answer and Republicans disagree, she’s already shown she’s willing to somehow make them do something until they capitulate.
In other words, her answer to disagreement is to use force.
I’m curious where else she would try and use force to make people change their minds. I seem to remember a concept where people would be herded into and shown things until their thinking changed. It wasn’t education, per se, but a kind of…well…reeducation, I suppose. Reeducation camps. Yeah, that’s it.
Is Harris trying to justify herding her opponents into reeducation camps until the grasp the supposed Utopian glory of gun control?
I’d like to believe that Harris’s stomach would turn at the suggestion of such a thing on American soil, but just how far of a leap is it from making lawmakers look at a stimulus to try and change their minds to doing something very similar to ordinary Americans?
To Kamala Harris, please understand that’s a terrifying concept. You need to back the hell off from that line of argument and retract that kind of thing immediately. You need to be very clear about how you wish to do no such thing to Americans, be they members of Congress or anyone else.
No one should be forced to do anything simply because they disagree with Democrats on something.
As it stands, people like you are why people like me have guns and won’t be giving them up any time soon. After all, I’m pretty sure that if people were to get herded into camps, I’d be among the first to be rounded up, but I’ll tell you one thing.
I ain’t going
Told ya she was a vial prosecutor...now she's looking to Prosecute Humanity.
Oh, and the six guns me dino owns (not to mentions how many guns my two grown sons own) contributes to that collective 300 million firearms.
Ammo? Got gobs. Getting more soon.
"Activist" has become a dirty word...we should wash our hands after typing that word.
Sleep tight!
How many were able to travel to the US for college? Answer only the Elite.
She , meaning her mother was the daughter of an Indian diplomat. After being educated and becoming a Doctor ,why did she not return home to treat her people?
Kamal’s dad is a Jamaican. To me Kamala is a DACA dreamer. Whoprostituted her self to advance politically.
It certainly seems to be coming true here in the good old US of A. The Democrat party and its "Shock Troops" are well on their way to destroying the Republic and have nicely mapped out how Democracy will only survive a few more short years if they get their way. Their end-game seems to be subjugation and the destruction of the Constitution (especially the first 10 amendments or the Bill of Rights).
Through their efforts we are being slowing drugged into submission and soon perhaps incarcerated for violating "Political Correctness"!
When do you think the Politically Correct fascists of the left and right (Neocons) will see the error of their ways? Perhaps they will see the light when they are held to the same standards and expectations that they have designed for the rest of us!
One really must be careful for what one wishes for because, as you know, sometimes wishes do come true and they turn out to be something we really didn't want after all!
Our liberties are very much at risk from the dangerous people now in the open about their desire for an authoritarian police state. Harris feels the time is ripe for a candidate who is not "pale, male, and stale" (take that, Joe and Bernie), and is going full socialist (forget the "democratic" crap).
Only a fool such as Harris (as judged by her illogical actions) would use Venezuela or Cuba as models for what we need in the United States. Starvation and repression are not positives now are they Harris is ready to enforce the same gun confiscation laws that the fascists in Venezuela did hence allowing a corrupt and violent government, run by a dictator to kill and wound his own helpless citizens. America, this is what you can expect if folks like Harris, Ocasio Cortez, Pelosi, Schumer and Elizabeth Warren have their misguided and illogical ways!
Is that really what Americans want to come to pass in our own country? If that is what the majority is willing to give up by caving to the likes of Kamala Harris and her party along with the rest of the stooges, then we are truly lost as a free and viable people and all should prepare for the coming American Gulag!
For what its worth.......
Mao took the Chinese citizens guns away and then he murdered 60,000,000 of them.
She arrogantly declared "I am doing the questioning" to shut up her subjects.
If H Clinton was a witch what is Harris?
The Democrats it seems are pulling out all stops to find the wackiest and irresponsible candidates for president (at least at this early juncture), perhaps to make the party look as crazy as it can.
Afterwards and closer to the primaries, they will launch the more moderate candidates that can take Trump on (my guess it will be either Blumberg or the CEO of Starbucks). Both by comparison would look good to the wide swath of under-educated voters who are just smart enough to understand that the party of Pelosi, Clinton and Schumer has painted itself into the corner of idiocy with its veering to the hard-left, even for the American electorate!
If I was planning the Democrat party strategy, that is exactly the plan I would embrace! For what its worth......
Brainstreammedia. Plaster memes on twitter and Facetook your data , and the rest of social media.
20-30 million citizens killed by Stalin in Russia.
Maloney — whose 23 years-old son, Matthew Denice, was killed in August 2011 by an illegal alien who ran over him while drunk driving without a license — told SiriusXM Patriot’s Breitbart News Tonight that the staff of Democrat 2020 presidential candidate Sen. Kamala Harris threatened to call Capitol Police when Angel Families visited the offices of prominent House and Senate Democrats to discuss illegal alien crime.
“So we went past her office about two weeks ago, we were in D.C. to see … Pelosi and Senator Chuck Schumer, and Kamala Harris, in front of her office, has a big welcome sign in Spanish that says ‘Dreamers Are Welcome,'” Maloney said.
MANSOUR: Were you welcome?
MALONEY: No, in fact, two of the people I was with, they threatened to call Capitol Police on them if they didn’t leave.
MANSOUR: Kamala Harris’ staff threatened to call the police on you?
MALONEY: Yes.
She seems to be a perfect Dem Candidate for 2020 Presidential run.
Perhaps it is time to unmask this cynical party and its machinations. My guess is that they are angling to get Bloomberg as their standard bearer (Oligarch, anti-freedom, anti-gun as in confiscation and with ample money to steal an election).
However, better than Bloomberg would be Schultz and his billions, liberal but not as virulent (at least in the public persona) as Bloomberg. Watch the game playing by Schumer and Pelosi in setting such a gambit up! The Dems are setting us up for such subterfuge I believe......
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/p...
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/ex-...
They thought they could take Trump down on nasty comments and alleged affairs, the deep state is running all kinds of variations to see what will work with their base, can a whore who was doing a married man make it? No? Dump, rinse and refill....
If they ever pass their insane laws at the state level (and you must notice the odd push for abortion up until birth laws being passed, it's no accident. Gun laws are being passed too, but mainstream knows if they let people know they will get all riled up, so they don't) , just use the Hillary defense " I don't know what guns or illegal big magazines you are talking about Mr. StormTrooper, they all fell out of the canoe that sank on the lake when it rolled over. What lake? I can't recall. When? Oh sometime a year, maybe 2 or 3 ago.... Nope, no guns here....hee hee...snigger...
They have no hope of ever enslaving us, they can fantasize, but they never will.
When you do a search on him, it is all BS, listing only his BD and what a great attorney he is suing banks!
He has not released the name of his parents and nothing is public about his personal life other than he is divorced with two children
What is there to hide?
“I’m sitting here, I’m trying to figure out what’s the difference between Stormy Daniels and Kamala Harris? Well, I mean, stop and think about it. What is the real difference?” conservative radio host Rush Limbaugh said. He added that it was unlikely to matter to Democrat primary voters.
“Just as the media began telling us that ‘everyone lies’ and ‘lying is healthy and human’ during Bill Clinton's sexual scandal, we can expect the media to begin informing us ‘Actually, sleeping with your married boss for what basically amounts to a monetary payoff is very empowering’ and suchlike,”
I am wanting to remember that this forum is neither Democratic nor Republican, but Objectivism.. Neither of the major parties comes even close to our principles. We should be condemning Trumps actions as much as Nancy's socialistic actions. Neither adheres to the Objectivism philosophy and they are both equally incorrect. This forum should be neutral re the two parties in power. They are both very, very far away from the basis principles to which Ayn would agree.
If you are unable to see the life and death struggle between the sides and keep clinging to your esoteric dream of an objectivist president, then you are ignoring reality in favor of an unrealistic idea while the country perish.
I see them as similar in their dividing people into groups and accepting using gov't force to help favored groups. I am concerned one day someone will unit Democrat and Republican impulses and become very dangerous.
Good by Sen Noname and Flake see you later Corker. BTW nobody divided a country more than your Hussein.
As I was reading these lines, I came to the same conclusion: would this witch be willing to look at the autopsy of the babies killed just after birth, thanks to the latest glory of the left's efforts to turn abortion into a mass murder tool?
As for forcing people to do what Harris wants to change their minds, remember the Albright threat "There is a special place in hell for women"....who don't vote for H Clinton? It is the same tactic, brutal and inhuman.
And these people have the nerve to talk about "democracy". They never knew what the term stands for.
Hitler (as all should be aware) embraced the works of Margaret Sanger (Planned Parenthood founder and Eugenicist) and the American Eugenics movement. Hitler even credited her and her ilk with his emerging views on genetics, racial purity and weeding out the inferior human conditions and races. This set the stage for his "Final Solution" and the elimination of the "defective" and racially impure.
Sanger and her "fellow travelers" developed t5he same belief structure soon to be embraced by Hitler the Nazis! This becomes a bit problematic in reconciling the Democrat mantra of caring for people and doing things "for the children", especially when they can kill the children without conscience. Also, creating corrosive dependencies on government by enabling a mindset that hardens people to the fact that they are taking human life with little regard, especially now when we are talking about aborting children after live birth.
Doesn't this represent just how far we have fallen as a society once predicated on a set of higher values, even with the warts and growing pains?
Kamala Harris is rapidly becoming a cartoon character or a sad punchline representative of what California has become. She is emblematic of all that is wrong with society even in her own personal life. Her mindset seems to be emblematic of the growing permissiveness of a society in steep decline! It now forever links Americans (at least those of a more radical and "progressive" bent) with that which we have fought and shed blood to eliminate from the human condition. Both Nazis Germany and its brother, Communism had the same disdain for human life and dignity.
What can she and the "leaders" of her party possibly be thinking? Especially the Governor of Virginia and the morons who submitted and co-sponsored such dehumanizing legislation designed to recreate the same Nazis mindset here!
Perhaps those who push this stuff are really part of a very active and virulent 4th Reich or resurgent Communist movement and, it is hidden right in plain site in the Blue states........
The left has always been more "efficient" in smear, innuendo and racial attacks than the right could ever get even close to.
Do we see the right marching on the streets terrorizing representatives of the left as they are common on the left against the right? No.
The left is well aware of this and uses it without any moral hindrance, soliciting the approval of the sheeple in the process.
That is the problem.
And so are the other Dem "candidates".
They will try to outdo each other in promising extreme measures, which is good b/c they'll alienate the majority of voters.
Just saw that Clinton still did not have enough and considers a run. Will she bring up the mantra again that she is the only "qualified" candidate? I am sure Hussein will endorse her again.