Article in this weekend's WSJ about growing season in Canada lasting longer.

Thank you, I echo Dobrien, excellent comment.

Excellent comment .

Al Gore is a d____d hypocrite. If he really believed one-tenth of his own message, he would have sold off that mansion of his long ago, and learned to get by with public, or at least mass, transport only, flown commercially, the whole nine yards.

The climate does change, it is their contrived power grabbing narrative that is fake.

Well, they do seem to want to keep repeating it, in a different way, to try to scare the sheeple...go look at "slave planet" (link above). If that isn't a deep state "mess them up with crap" website.....

https://www.sott.net/article/390583-G...
Yet I did find a rather weird web site that is such a mish mash of stuff that seems to border on the insane, but is so sneaky as to put the "earth is burning up" theory front and center while bemoaning the lack of sunspots. Then on the edge of "aliens are doing it. Almost an amateur attempt to cloud the real issue:
https://www.slaveplanet.net/index.php...
Their name seems to give it away...:)

They do plan for the long term.

You just nailed it. The people pushing that narrative want the rest of us to just crawl away and die.

Exactly. That is why it is so telling WHO issued the report. They are the manipulators in this case, the rest are just playing their parts.

l have seen the population explosion doom (1970), the new Ice Age doom (1975), the Nuclear Winter doom (1980s), the Acid Rain doom (1980s). Same failure, different doom.

Good points....:)

Well, it is hard to find reliable lies but here we go for alternatives:

https://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/201...

Fat Al is back togrub more money, as he personally cotributes as much as a small city to the problem with his "perks"....

http://www.newser.com/story/267677/go...

https://www.eenews.net/stories/106009...

Here is the horses mouth:

https://nca2018.globalchange.gov/

Now, their charter seems self serving:

The Global Change Research Act of 1990 mandates that the U.S. Global Change Research Program (USGCRP) deliver a report to Congress and the President no less than every four years that “1) integrates, evaluates, and interprets the findings of the Program…; 2) analyzes the effects of global change on the natural environment, agriculture, energy production and use, land and water resources, transportation, human health and welfare, human social systems, and biological diversity; and 3) analyzes current trends in global change, both human-induced and natural, and projects major trends for the subsequent 25 to 100 years.”1

So, I am not exactly sure all this is based on cold, hard factual science. Besides, they still didn't explain why the turtles were not told....:)

Ah, read the comment I made "classic deep state". That was exactly what they were trying to do, Yet go look at who made the report. More deep state. It is like the force, it surrounds and penetrates. Only this is the dark side....Don't ignore their propaganda because it is disturbing and you can see it is manipulative. Use it as a starting point and go back and then you see who also is playing in the game, and just how deep the rot is. Know thy enemy...

I just saw an episode of uncovering history or some such on Discovery, and lo and behold they were in greenland, talking to dudes who are excavating the Viking settlements and answering all those silly questions like how warm it was, they raised sheep and hunted walrus up there, farmed etc. But the grand solar minimum will knock them back, just ask the turtles...

The article was from them but the report is real govt garbage:

https://nca2018.globalchange.gov/

It's not the forest fires that are the problem. It's the fact that people are building homes in the forest because the forest is an attractive place to live. (If the forest was not there it would be an ugy desert- like so much of southern CA would be without all the water coming from the Colorado river- the source of water outside of CA.) If there weren't any homes in the forest there would be no liberal outcry to "do something."
Typical liberals- they cause a problem themselves and then insist that government steal our money to protect the liberals property.
If you want to live in the forest, then accept the danger yourself (not you specifically, preimert1;^) and pay for it yourself when the forest burns down your house. Its like a hurricane hitting coastal homes, or floods on flood plains. When you choose to build your house in a dangerous area, then it's your problem. Don't insist that others pay for your bad decisions.
(Yes, I agree, government agencies are not managing the forests on federal property as well as private owners could. This issue has been exposed for many years by people like Randall O'Toole at Liberty magazine. See Fraud in the Forest - http://www.libertyunbound.com/sites/f...

Right. The best way to reduce or eliminate forest fires is to get rid of all the trees. Its true that they produce some oxygen, but I read where most of it comes from comes from plankton in the oceans.

I agree with the Kalifornia position, but disagree with Rainforest. Basically, they have no idea what is in it, biologically, many discoveries made there. Also, just like the global warming loons, they do not understand the full impat of the rain-forest ecologically in the overall weather and climate system. It does act as a huge carbon sink, but also generates massive water vapor and oxygen. I hate to see them trash something no one fully understands, then go, "oops" afterwards...A lot of the "farming" is incredibly inefficient, and grazing can just create a desert, ask the Midwest, the dust-bowl was born from sheep grazing in the early part of the 30th century. Along came a warming trend and poof, you are screwed.