I don't like Donald Trump
It's true...I've never really like Donald Trump, because he is a bully and I had a lot of trouble with bullies, growing up.
On the other hand, people like me went out of our way to befriend the biggest bully, so that the others would just leave us alone.
That's why I stick with Donald Trump...nobody wants to mess with the big dog!
On the other hand, people like me went out of our way to befriend the biggest bully, so that the others would just leave us alone.
That's why I stick with Donald Trump...nobody wants to mess with the big dog!
The best proof of his swamp draining is the scum frogs croaking in unison on The MSM.
Have no manners they act like spoiled little brats
They need to be slapped across their mouths.
A weaker character would have folded under the vicious war the left and some on the right are waging against him. His "training" over the years as he built his empire prepared him for it. It is a miracle what he has accomplished in a short period of time despite the colossal headwinds.
No wonder the left is pulling out all stops as they see his success.
They are proving without a shadow of a doubt why the American people don't want them.
https://youtu.be/G2qIXXafxCQ
I remember this but it was sooooo good to see it again!
"Ill take all the slings and arrows for you" - said the then candidate Trump. God bless him, he has been doing that for almost 2 years now. The enemy is relentless. Seeing the face of that traitor Hussein and Clinton again - just to think what would we now be had she been elected. And to also think how long Hussein is able to live his high life for all the crimes he committed against this country. The cabal is protecting him.
God bless president Trump and his family! Give him strength to persevere in his saga.
Thanks again Dobrien!!
This might give you a smile. Note the yard line and the letter it corresponds to.
https://www.reddit.com/r/greatawakeni...
Have a great day.
I noticed McCain among the H Clinton party, cheering her on.
Yes...even paying for a "dirt" report on Trump.
https://youtu.be/G2qIXXafxCQ
tərs/Submit
adjective
sparing in the use of words; abrupt.
"a terse statement"
synonyms: brief, short, to the point, concise, succinct, crisp, pithy, incisive, trenchant, short and sweet, laconic, elliptical;
This feels like Deja vu. Hah
I saw him do some amazing things during his presidency like getting inflation back down to single digits and scaring the Hell out of a terrorist regime (Iran). Then, again, after 4 years of Jimmy Carter, I may have been somewhat star struck by the man.
Yes Ronald Reagan started his presidency ball to the wall so to speak .Then John Hinkley Jr. Shot him ,he was never the same IMHO.
Why did George H.W. Bush and his cabinet determine that John W. Hinckley Jr. — the man who in 1981 tried to kill the newly inaugurated President Ronald Reagan — was a lone nut, and no conspiracy, foreign or domestic, was involved? How did they arrive at this conclusion just five hours after the shooting, without any thorough examination?
Imagine , then, to learn that John Hinckley Jr., the man who shot and nearly killed President Ronald Reagan in 1981 — an attempt which, if successful, would have resulted in then-Vice President George H.W. Bush moving up to the top spot — was none other than a friend of the Bush family.
How strange is that?
The Hinckleys and the Bushes have been friendly for decades, going back to the days when both families set down stakes in the dusty town of Midland, Texas, a magnet for the children of wealthy, East Coast families seeking to cash in on the oil boom.
The Hinckleys were donors to Poppy Bush’s political campaigns over the years, and they gave to support the first, unsuccessful bid for Congress of the young George W. Bush, in 1978. The families lived close to each other, they socialized; I saw indications that, at one point, they may have shared the same lawyer.
Even more strangely, Neil Bush, son of the vice president, was scheduled to have dinner with Hinckley’s brother, Scott, the day after the shooting.
The shooting took place on Monday, March 30, 1981. Neil and his wife, Sharon, were to have dinner with a girlfriend of hers who brought along Scott Hinckley as her date. Scott had supposedly been invited to round out the foursome.
Neil and his wife, and Scott, all lived in Denver at the time. Scott’s father’s oil company, Vanderbilt Oil, had its headquarters in Denver at that time. Scott was a company vice president.
Meanwhile, the shooter, John W. Hinckley Jr., lived from time to time with his family in a small town outside Denver. In fact, at the time he shot Reagan, he was living with his parents.
This put Neil Bush, the senior Hinckleys, Scott Hinckley, and would-be presidential assassin John W. Hinckley Jr. in close quarters over an extended period.
Neil might reasonably have been aware that John Jr. was having serious problems, and was in psychiatric care. And — given the Bush family’s politically-driven strategy of tracking and staying in touch with huge numbers of family friends and acquaintances, plus a fondness for sharing the doings of their network among themselves — the probability that Neil would have relayed to his parents John Jr.’s mental problems, and psychiatric treatments, is not remote.
I think that happeed when she ran in 2008. Out of the BLUE came an unknown Obama who blew her out of the water at the last minute. In 2012 she knew better than to lose a second time. Then in 2016 she was convinced she would win, and lo and behold a total unknown Trump appears and blows her out of the water again Maybe NOW she realizes that people just dont like her and will never vote her in.
I would not be surprised if H Clinton run again in 2020. If the left wants her, that is.
I still have a Trump poster proudly displayed at my business. I am as entitled to like Trump as they are entitled to hate him.
Actually I think I would like him. He has guts and takes no crap. Sometimes when presented with a difficult decision, I ask myself "what would Trump do". Usually the answer I get back is what he would do, and its right.
I would love to meet him someday. Probably as you say, it will never happen.
I do see a very large number of videos andTweets with Q references such as #Qanon # WWG1WGA
#MAGA.
No name to name a handful.
They unknowingly have drawn the dreaded card of the monopoly of life:
Do NOT Pass GO!...Go Straight to Gitmo.
As to what he can actually accomplish:
1) He could reduce ridiculous regulations
2) He could slow down somewhat the rapid spread of socialist policies
3) He could do some things to keep the swamp from getting deeper and wider
4) He could stand in the way of further gun control
5) He could get foreign countries to respect us more than they have.
6) Be tougher on illegal immigrants and hopefully make them afraid to some here.
What I dont think he could do:
1) Do much to rescind welfare benefits that have already been granted
2) STOP illegal immigration by building a wall.
3) Stop Inflation and deficit spending
4) Actually repeal Obamacare without replacing it with another boondoggle government program.
I give him another two years of being pounded on by the establishment, and then he will be defeated finally by a true socialist like Bernie Sanders, or equivalent. Clinton is dead in the water, fortunately.
I am happy that Trump is actually doing what he said he would, even though the liberals are trying EVERYTHING to stop him.
Mueller and his cohorts are working feversihly to keep that from happening. Keep in mind Mueller's part in the Uranium1 deal, etc. How all the players were enriched via deals while in government "service".
If, and when, that all pops to the surface there will be hell to pay. And they are attempting to avoid that happening.
Swamp creatures would like to avoid the light of day of that info.
KAG!
And sometimes those who decry the savagery the most...are themselves the most savage, and will resort to the most savage means to get their way. I think Ayn Rand demonstrated that beautifullly in AS.
I only learned about the massacre a few years ago.
#1 - Most of what you see of Trump these past 15 - 20 or so years is an act. He isn't that uncouth-sounding in person. For evidence, you only need to look at his media appearances and interviews in the 1980's & 90's.
#2 - People who do know and worked for him, LOVE him. Not just like, LOVE. I've heard many times that he is surprisingly charming in person. The only thing that can engender such love from good people is honesty.
People are SO used to the dishonesty of "tact" that they recoil at Trump's bluntness now. Honest people, however, find it VERY refreshing. This is not to say he doesn't say DECEPTIVE things. He does. The SMART know the difference. The LEFT cannot or refuses to.
To understand the change in him noted in #1, I think you have to realize that he's seen the evil of our government and the "elite class" up close all these years. I think he's actually wanted to run for president for decades and maybe he even prepared for it all this time. He has talked about it from time to time in interviews. Then you have to also realize that he's a student of Sun Tsu's "The Art of War" (hence, the title of his best-selling business book):
“All warfare is based on deception. Hence, when we are able to attack, we must seem unable; when using our forces, we must appear inactive; when we are near, we must make the enemy believe we are far away; when far away, we must make him believe we are near.”
“Appear weak when you are strong, and strong when you are weak.”
Change "weak" to "like a buffoon" and you will see that his personality deception makes him appear stupid, or narcissistic and self-involved when he's watching them all. The "elite" relax and commit more crimes, do more damage to themselves in the public perception of them. He's making them EXPOSE themselves for who they REALLY are and they also keep doubling down on it because of their VISCERAL hate of him.
I haven't had as much fun watching the political theater in my life. We are truly living in an era of GREAT historical import. I feel bad for the people who refuse to see it.
Nope, I don't dislike Donald Trump. I think I LOVE him. :-)
The left elite are going down and it is like watching roaches flea from a can of raid.
Today the big shot from CBS Moonves goes down
I can hear his chorus with Eric Schneiderman and
Harvey Weinstein singing #me too. Stay tuned for the canary Mack singing about NXVUM .
Stock up on popcorn.
#MAGA
Search Https//Qmap.pub if you haven't already.
Warm regards,
DOB
Experience? Exactly what experience do you prefer? A career politician that has made a living being suckled by government? How about a person whose PEAK experience was a "community organizer" in a local metro area (not even at the State level - oh wait, maybe being elected as a senator that didn't really do anything). OR would you prefer nearly self-made billionaire with a lifetime of building a multi-national company that had to deal with all the crap government at all levels, unions, and the mafia had to dish out?
Do you prefer the experience of a man who virtually apologizes for being American and wimps out when it's time to be strong or a woman that doesn't even give a damn about America's national sovereignty? Or a man who says let's make America great again and takes steps to stop America from being invaded and screwed by the rest of the world?
I say it's alarming how close such a person as the Evil Hag got to being POTUS!
It's alarming how absent constitutional constraints, a democratic republic turns into a mob, empowering name-calling rabble of the world who otherwise would be harmless.
I haven't seen the details for the Trump administration's "Tax Reform II" proposal so I can't comment on whether or not he will be raising taxes anytime soon. So far "Tax Reform I" is a good start and seems to be working. There is no doubt in my mind, however, that the Communists (Democrats) would have introduced a plethora of "confiscatory spread the wealth" tax schemes requiring additional government bullies to go out and slap around the citizenry.
"It's alarming...". Yes, it sure is as the Communists (Democrats) have become quite open about empowering and inciting name-calling mob rule whether it be on the streets, in private businesses, or in Senate hearings.
I meant by borrowing heavily, leading to an eventual crisis, leading to higher tax rates. I seem to remember people on this board saying $400 billion per year structural deficit in 2016 was unsustainable. They were right. So is a $1 trillion deficit in 2019.
All that matters is spending. One way or the other you pay for it.
Your view of this being a partisan issue doesn't seem even remotely true to me. It's just short-term thinking and people being used to government spending being a huge fraction of the economy and being used to looking to the gov't for solutions to citizens' individual problems.
Unvarnished truth, CG. Both major parties are guilty of buying votes and growing government against their oath to the Constitution. A friend told me his research showed that government spending led directly to the 2000 recession when the growth of spending slowed. I don't think it's nearly that simple, but I agree with you that government spending is far too high for the health of America's liberty.
"All that matters is spending. One way or the other you pay for it." Also true, but I see Trump's plan is to get government out of the way so America's capitalist base can get on with the business of generating more wealth. Firing up the private sector "should" begin reducing the number of recipients of the welfare state and generate more revenue. This should reduce the matter of spending and increase the ability to pay debts at the same time. Stemming massive illegal immigration also has the effect of reducing the number of recipients of the great welfare state and the other expenses it causes. Addressing artificial and unfair trade issues should reduce the one way flow of wealth from the US to the rest of the world.
The issue is partisan only with respect the Dems are virtually fully collectivists and the Reps can still field a capitalist leaning candidate like Trump and actually win an election. The parties are almost the same, but not quite identical in their slide leftward. The election of Trump may be causing a wakening and rebuilding of the Rep party. The Dems are demonstrating they have gone far left and won't be back.
I think you are wrong on both counts. What he's done is cut back regulations, culled the government payroll, renegotiated NAFTA with the Mexicans and is i the process of doing the same with Canada. He has successfully threatened tariffs increases to this nations who raped us with tariffs on our goods and has revived part of the Steel and coal industry in the process.
End result, he doesn't need to raise taxes or curtail spending AS LONG AS THE ECONOMY FLOURISHES AND THE GDP CONTINUES TO INCREASE. Government will take in more taxes as a consequence of more robust business and spend less as result of internal cuts.
I can't for a second fathom how you think he hasn't or wont do anything.
As I told a O supporter, all he's really done is use the existing system and remove the choke hold O placed on it to show Americans that Capitalism is alive and well and works.
An attention seeking narcissist, yes but that's nothing new about Donald Trump. A clown, no.
That describes every congressman in both major parties and 98% of the other looters in the Dark Center.
"As I told a O supporter" - you're telling another O supporter when you respond to CG, AJA. Don't expect them to take the red pill though; they are colorblinded by the potential accusations of racism from their comrades.
If the deficit falls lower than it was when in 2016, you'll be proven right.
I assume you liked Hussein's "experience", correct?
I think he tweets to piss off the liberals and keep them using up their energy attacking him. I think he enjoys pissing them off, if the truth be told.
There is no one else I can think of who just takes a licking and keeps on ticking- over and over again.
You dont like his authoritarian tendencies, but when up against the true EVIL in washington DC, I am not so sure I object to him being a bully.
This made me laugh aloud. President Trump seems to forget his key positions on any issue, just saying whatever random thought comes to his mind and gets him attention at the moment, forgetting if he said the exact opposite a month earlier.
All arguments that Trump actually wants smaller and less intrusive gov't but consistently says and does the opposite seem absurd. It's a just-so argument, post-hoc rationalization. No matter what happens, it's all part of a Seldon plan whose goal may be completely contrary to everything happening now. The simple and obvious explanation, e.g. simple pandering, is almost always correct.
What would you have him do?
That's why the left is digging deep to resurrect their barely breathing(referring to political power) brethren(0zero and any other socialist around).
CG sounds really angry and I can't figure out why, other than extreme disappointment with the '16 election.
Oh well.