Ex-Navy admiral: Revoke my security clearance
If anything confirms the deep state (which I think is what Ayn Rand was trying to warn us of), it is this, someone treading on their military service to appear offended because they want to keep their access so they can go on TV and be brilliant talking gasbags. Another corrupted senior officer. Ask yourself, why does ANYONE need a security clearance AFTER they leave the job? ALL security systems are founded on one basic principle: Need to know. How can someone who has left that position have a need to know? We ALWAYS terminated security clearances of people who left the submarine command precisely because of need to know, which no longer existed. The only reason anyone would WANT to keep one: access to secrets you can use to sell yourself, manipulate others and be a self important, pompous ass. Brennan is a traitor, Comey is one too. They abused their power, then set themselves up with their access to sell to the higest bidder. Brennan needed a high level security clearance so he could consult for CNN? Really? You think this is at all realistic?
If anything, this is concrete proof of what is going on, and how people get power and then abuse it for themselves, and will sell us out along the way. ALL clearances should be revoked immediately, if that person is not in the position for which it was granted. Common sense.
If anything, this is concrete proof of what is going on, and how people get power and then abuse it for themselves, and will sell us out along the way. ALL clearances should be revoked immediately, if that person is not in the position for which it was granted. Common sense.
As I said when I left DoD work, my clearences were withdrawn immediately. I no longer needed to have access. Some of the project I worked still have restrictions imposed on my ability to talk about them and to travel freely. Brennan et al shold just shut up and do what they know they should be doing, and not blabbering away.
True story: Our off-base site's security officer was asked by a snotty summer-help kid about the on-premises safe.
"What's that safe?"
-- "That's for keeping classified information."
"What is in it?"
-- "The answer to your question is NO."
"Then you mean there isn't anything in it?"
-- "The answer to your question is NO."
"Then there is?"
-- "The answer to your question is NO."
That is the part people should be asking about, not revoking clearances, but why retired people have then at all!
ALL clearances should be revoked immediately, if that person is not in the position for which it was granted. Common sense.
Otherwise, if you need to keep your clearance so that you can comment with "authority" on tv or wherever you become a VIOLATER of your PRIVLEGE to have access to secure information. IT IS SIMPLE!!
If they later have a "need to know", then the clearances can be re-instated.
Now I hear all the crying about violation of the whiners 1st Amendment rights. Really? Hey, I'm a loyal born American citizen with zero criminal past, so why doesn't MY 1st Amendment rights allow ME to have all those clearances? To paraphrase former Governor Huckabee, if it's a 1st Amendment issue, then why not sell the clearance forms at county fair booths for a buck or two so we all can have one and help bring money into the mired-in-debt treasury to boot?
Item XYZ requires SECRET clearance to access, and Joe Lunchbox has "SECRET, Top Secret, Eyes Only, and Ultra-Violet" clearances in his jacket, Joe would only reveal that he has SECRET clearance to gain access to the XYZ item.
Which is to say that when the original possessor of the SECRET information was asked to disclose to Joe Lunchbox, this inquiry from the clearance authority would also only confirm that Joe has SECRET clearance.
In other words, you DO NOT need to know how much clearance I have, you only need to know that I have sufficient clearance to receive XYZ item. Anything else is CLASSIFIED.
Anyone who knows this also knows that Hillary belongs in prison. It's not a crime to receive classified information above your level, only to distribute it. And that's why Hillary is guilty.
Because of certain inequities, we can also conclude that another aspect of security clearances is to punish political adversaries, and provide meat for the sausage grinders, while allowing the privileged few to eschew the rules with impunity. And that's not right.
The explanation of the 1st amendment "violation" is that Brennan is being punished for criticizing the President, but the freedom of speech clause is about being able to express your thoughts without fear of legal suppression. It is not license with a guaranteed freedom from any consequences. Even Brennan himself had second thoughts about his irrational outburst accusing the President of committing treason by meeting with Putin.
I've seen this claimed frequently, but it doesn't hold water. Clearance is needed to receive or learn of secret information. In that scenario what is needed is for the replacement to have the clearance and the former official/employee to be able to verify the replacement's authorization to be "updated".
Then again, to me needing to do that signifies the outgoing employee failed to properly document and store the information necessary for their successor. As far as ongoing, either be under active contract or uninvolved.
If your removal was the result of some negative condition then the clearance should expire immediately.
When my wife retires she will sign a NDA saying she will not divulge company secrets or go to work for any competitor for 5 years and she will assist where necessary during the transition.
My late grandfather had TS clearance during and after WW 1 but I doubt he kept it all of his life but don't know for sure. It was listed as "Management Confidential" in my working career but not National Security.
Security clearance is required only for those who are in active positions, not retired like you.
Having said that, I'd enjoy my retirement if I were you rather than playing politics.
Killed Bin Laden? Bull shit. Show me the body you statist liar.
https://youtu.be/yuC_4mGTs98
https://www.yahoo.com/news/brennan-ge...