Maybe the Russians Did It, by Robert Gore
Moreover, a rush to judgment, blaming someone before an investigation commences, much less concludes, has become almost an admission that the assignment of culpability lacks credibility. The establishment and its media don’t have the power to persuade they did back in the “lone gunman” days of the 1960s. There are too many people asking too many questions on the internet. The official story line dissolved in the Skripal poisoning, and it was starting to in Syria as well. When governments and their media organs proclaim with certainty conclusions before any investigation has been conducted and any rational conclusions can be reached, what conclusion is possible other than that the narrative has been concocted?
Ask yourself why did NK stay out of the news during this very busy time for the Pres .Ahhh WWlll it is the Patriots vs the deep state (worldwide) The thing is WWlll was started on Election Day. We were mired in the Middle East because of the Bush/Clinton/Obama crime syndicate that had America on the verge of destruction. I also think you use a Michael Mann type of hockey stick graph with the assumption Trump will have Six and 1/2 more years of big deficits. The military was degraded by Obama and was in dire straits.
Peace through strength .
Thanks for your consideration.
Russia could be the best ally America could ever have, and a mutually profitable trading relationship. Overcoming mistrust between Russians and Americans should be a primary goal of free men. The high frontier is much closer to colonization with such a partnership.
This is all speculation. It could be the Syria figured the US was committed to removing troops from the area and they were safe to use the weapons. That is hard for me to accept though. Maybe Syria had an opportunity to reach objective and they used chemical weapons because they thought it was worth the price of a US cruise missile strike. The narrative offered in this article seems the most plausible.
Regarding “decisive action”, this is just the standard practice. Doing otherwise, the conventional thinking goes, “risks normalizing chemical weapons.” The part I’m not sure is whether Russia longs to be a superpower policing the world like this or whether they think it’s wasteful and are content to let the US keep the role and keep the exponentially growing debt.