Answer to first question: King Barry repeatedly tried to be that person~usually right after innocent blood was "Allahu Akbar!" spilled. Answer to #2. Snowflakes think they have that right. Anyhoo, I originally came here to state that Michael Savage is barred from entering Great Britain because its lib pinheaded twits in charge think, oih say, thauut such an outspoken chap will rabble rouse up a bit o' bother.
Yes you Dino read the same story I did about the sleepy little town where daddy spook and his daughter caught a bad case of a nerve gas agent On a park bench. Somehow in my head the saying what goes around comes around is skipping.
Nerve gas? https://www.cnn.com/2018/03/14/europe... So it was. My bad. My aging dino mind is about to be a year older. Quitting spookdom must be like retiring from the Mafia. Don't let long memories find out where you stay.
Hmmmmm........ Consequences for your actions Never heard of it. Got to be somebody else's fault. How can you be so .....ist to imply a responsibility for behavior.
These attacks on freedom are part of a dangerous long term anti-reason anti-free speech blame game. Let’s say there was a group of people that if the group was offended by an individual, that individual would be hunted down and executed. Now this is a problem. So, should the blame for this be placed on the individual who offended the group? The answer is obvious common sense. But, it also depends on your respect for individual rights.
She's not the first one. The UK banned Michael Savage decades ago.
While it is fairly obvious that this is a ludicrous reason to ban someone for entry, the UK has entirely the right to choose whom it allows into its country. I just wish they'd be less hypocritical and stop letting in all the Muslim rape gangs who are taking over London.
The statists world wide are so afraid of the truth , They know they are being exposed . They know that the people are awakening. This "Uncivil war" rages and it is really WWIII. Kill the shadow Govt. Kill the deep state. If not it is back to the dark ages. Support the Internet bill of rights.
Piers Morgan did not handle one single argument about the religion of Islam but simply kept trying to over talk his guest demanding that his view of the guest being racist was the only thing of note in the conversation. The elitist journalist are the voice of the state determining that threats or non threats should be assessed by what they teach and more importantly by what they do because of their beliefs.
Some UK "journalists" don't like the documentary she's making about South Africa. Now that the newly elected President and the legislature have decided to take all white owned property without compensation, the Brits are uncomfortable that Southern has been interviewing the Dutch-descended Afrikans white farmers and showing various South African black politicians dancing and singing about killing all the whites. They say she's promoting a "false" theme that the South African government is racist (even though it sure as hell looks like it). PC folk don't like the truth.
So far, the only powerful organization to demand censorship is the left side of the forum. While they would deny it with great emphasis, they cannot tolorate free speech which shows them to be the fascists that they are.
"her entry was not “conducive to the public good.”
The UK is well ahead of becoming the mindless dictatorship Atlas Shrugged portrayed. May is protecting the abusive ways UK has undertaken in the name of "multiculturalism" A friend of mine came back from London recently: by his account security has taken enormously extensive levels. It takes a long time to enter any public establishment, delayed by the security check people have to undertake. Same as in France and Germany. The Europeans are inexorably sliding into a suicidal change and it is beyond me why their life instincts do not kick in?
Who is it that speaks for all of Islam anyway?
And since when does anyone have the right to not be offended?
Answer to #2. Snowflakes think they have that right.
Anyhoo, I originally came here to state that Michael Savage is barred from entering Great Britain because its lib pinheaded twits in charge
think, oih say, thauut such an outspoken chap will rabble rouse up a bit o' bother.
On a park bench. Somehow in my head the saying what goes around comes around is skipping.
So it was. My bad. My aging dino mind is about to be a year older.
Quitting spookdom must be like retiring from the Mafia.
Don't let long memories find out where you stay.
Never heard of it. Got to be somebody else's fault.
How can you be so .....ist to imply a responsibility for behavior.
Let’s say there was a group of people that if the group was offended by an individual, that individual would be hunted down and executed. Now this is a problem. So, should the blame for this be placed on the individual who offended the group? The answer is obvious common sense. But, it also depends on your respect for individual rights.
While it is fairly obvious that this is a ludicrous reason to ban someone for entry, the UK has entirely the right to choose whom it allows into its country. I just wish they'd be less hypocritical and stop letting in all the Muslim rape gangs who are taking over London.
and it is really WWIII. Kill the shadow Govt. Kill the deep state. If not it is back to the dark ages. Support the Internet bill of rights.
"Public good"...Right out of AS.
Who is John Galt?
The UK is well ahead of becoming the mindless dictatorship Atlas Shrugged portrayed. May is protecting the abusive ways UK has undertaken in the name of "multiculturalism" A friend of mine came back from London recently: by his account security has taken enormously extensive levels. It takes a long time to enter any public establishment, delayed by the security check people have to undertake. Same as in France and Germany. The Europeans are inexorably sliding into a suicidal change and it is beyond me why their life instincts do not kick in?