I'm not sure what you mean. Federal Judges have the authority to hold hearings and render verdicts based on lawsuits brought by State Attorney Generals which challenge the Constitutionality of Executive Orders. There were many challenges made to Obama's unilateral alterations to his own ACA which delayed certain privileges, etc.

The problem I have in this case is that these judges aren't using any laws to nullify the EO - they're trying to claim that the bias in the EO nullfies it. The code of the statute, however, doesn't care what the bias is - it simply gives carte blanche discretion to the President. The judges are reading something into their interpretation which doesn't exist - anywhere - and using that as the basis for overturning the travel bans. It should get them a one-way ticket to disbarment.

Me dino heard Rush Limbaugh talk about Dems keeping quiet about a rise of victories in localities across the country.
Still sticking in me craw was the Kalifornia money helping to pay for ads the now an Alabama Senator Doug Jones used to defame Roy Moore, without any basis in fact comparing Moore to George Wallace as if the accusing women Gloria Allred trotted out wasn't bad enough.
Me dino never saw so many blacks crowded in and about at the place where I vote.

For certain!!!