10

Second federal judge blocks move to end DACA; Judicial Activism against an Unconstitutional Law

Posted by $ haseloff 6 years, 8 months ago to Government
27 comments | Share | Flag

Only in America could the mainstream media call those who want strengthened borders "Racists" and "Xenophobes" while those who are here illegally are referred to as "Dreamers".

We we're just discussing the inability of people to follow laws (Sanctuary Cities) over here: https://www.galtsgulchonline.com/post...

Go check out that discussion as well!
SOURCE URL: https://steemit.com/news/@libertylol/second-federal-judge-blocks-move-to-end-daca-judicial-activism-against-an-unconstitutional-law


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by $ AJAshinoff 6 years, 8 months ago
    It was an unconstitutional executive order to begin with, a temporary onecat that. It was never law therefore they have nothing to judge. It expired. Oh fkin well.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ blarman 6 years, 8 months ago
      The bigger issue is that these judges are specifically ignoring the appropriate statute passed way back under Eisenhower which specifically grants to the President the ability to restrict travel and visa applications from countries deemed to be dangerous.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by $ AJAshinoff 6 years, 8 months ago
        They have no jurisdiction over executive orders. The voice is moot.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by $ blarman 6 years, 8 months ago
          I'm not sure what you mean. Federal Judges have the authority to hold hearings and render verdicts based on lawsuits brought by State Attorney Generals which challenge the Constitutionality of Executive Orders. There were many challenges made to Obama's unilateral alterations to his own ACA which delayed certain privileges, etc.

          The problem I have in this case is that these judges aren't using any laws to nullify the EO - they're trying to claim that the bias in the EO nullfies it. The code of the statute, however, doesn't care what the bias is - it simply gives carte blanche discretion to the President. The judges are reading something into their interpretation which doesn't exist - anywhere - and using that as the basis for overturning the travel bans. It should get them a one-way ticket to disbarment.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
          • Posted by $ AJAshinoff 6 years, 8 months ago
            I'll admit that I could be wrong (and trust your knowledge). Still, I'll have to look it up to be entirely sure for my own satisfaction.

            While this is not the way it is, nor the way the Framers intended it to be, the courts have no authority by way of the Constitution to determine what is and isn't Constitutional, its something they granted themselves. The fact that today they are permitted this transgression is why they hold influence over society regardless of what society wants.
            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
            • Posted by $ blarman 6 years, 8 months ago
              The generally referenced law applicable to this is 8 U.S.C. ยง1182(f). Hope that helps you in your searches and please let us all know if you come across something particularly noteworthy.
              Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by freedomforall 6 years, 8 months ago
    NY judge (and I use the term "judge" loosely) so there is no surprise here. Why are judges from NY and CA allowed to tell 48 other states what they should do to uphold existing immigration law?
    Capricious? Its the irrational liberal judges that are capricious.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ allosaur 6 years, 8 months ago
      You'd think lawmakers could fix the tyranny inflicted by these little libtard judgie-wudgies who keep popping out of the blue.
      No help would come from the Jackass Party, of course, yet then there is also that murky swamp where creepzoid RINOs lurk here and about with their $ecretive agenda$.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by $ Suzanne43 6 years, 8 months ago
        And if George Sorros gets his way, there will be more Liberal judges. He's putting a huge amount of money into backing Democrat candidate judges and lawmakers who support open borders, etc. His candidates have been winning. This is CHILLING.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by $ allosaur 6 years, 8 months ago
          Me dino heard Rush Limbaugh talk about Dems keeping quiet about a rise of victories in localities across the country.
          Still sticking in me craw was the Kalifornia money helping to pay for ads the now an Alabama Senator Doug Jones used to defame Roy Moore, without any basis in fact comparing Moore to George Wallace as if the accusing women Gloria Allred trotted out wasn't bad enough.
          Me dino never saw so many blacks crowded in and about at the place where I vote.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ blarman 6 years, 8 months ago
    DACA wasn't even a law - it was a knowingly-unConstitutional Executive Order that should have gotten Barack Obama Impeached and Convicted solely on that one case alone. The power to regulate immigration is specifically given to the Legislative Branch to oversee and Obama even admitted he didn't have the Constitutional authority but did it anyway.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by wmiranda 6 years, 8 months ago
    DACA is caca. It was wrong at the beginning it will be worse at the end. DACA has never been about humanitarian relief. It has always been about bolstering a failing political party as American citizens awaken to the realities of a political monarchy system created due to lack of term limits at all national level positions. In essence, at the most basic level, those arguing for DACA are arguing against American sovereignty.
    This issue reminds me of a recent trip I made to Mexico. While boarding our plane in Dallas to Puerto Vallarta, the agent continuously insisted we have our passport in hand, not to inspect, but to ensure we had one. The agent also said that if we arrived in Mexico without a passport, we would be immediately "be sent back on the next plane out." The irony was inescapable.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by DrZarkov99 6 years, 8 months ago
    What I find bizarre is that "Black Panther" is the movie that the PC police are raving about. It depicts an authoritarian ruler who builds a wall around his country to keep out those he considers dangerous, and keep his race pure. I guess it's OK for people of color to do all the things that are being labeled "racist" when others attempt the same.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by Esceptico 6 years, 8 months ago
    It is amazing. A rule created by an Executive Order can be ended by an Executive Order. Seems simple enough to understand, unless you are an Obama-appointed judge. There needs to be a reform not only of how judges are appointed, but in the system itself. I proposed one such reform (I am a lawyer), but establishment publications will not publish it.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by CaptainKirk 6 years, 8 months ago
    And I will say it again. The Death Penalty for Activist Judges!
    It is NOT a law, they cannot rule on it.
    And it violates the Presidents Right to control immigration.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ blarman 6 years, 8 months ago
      What I would like to see is an automatic trigger provision where if a judge's rulings are overturned by higher courts more than three times in a year their appointments must then be ratified AGAIN by the Senate for them to remain as judges. Properly, these kinds of judges would be Impeached, but the legislature's history on impeachment of the Judicial branch is a joke.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by Mr_Stone 6 years, 8 months ago
    This is yet again a sign of the Altruism and parasitic nature which Ayn Rand warned our society about. Perhaps when our country fails will people finally realize what they did wrong.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo