Hey! Here's an idea....why don't they publish a map showing where all the welfare recipients live? WE pay for their way...WE should know where they live too...
Well...isn't it a civil liberty to protect my life and property? Where are they with this gun hoopla? They pick and choose which liberties they see fit to put their weight behind. It's disgusting. BAN THE ACLU!! (but print their names and addresses first. )
So, I guess this is what our military is fighting to defend: The looter opulent lifestyle off the backs of Real Americans? All the while they spew hate for the military, the values the military hold onto, yet, demand ever-more sacrifice?! I'm absolutely disgusted. I'm so glad I'm retired, I could not stand to think I would be putting my life on the the line for them, doing things they themselves would NEVER do...I don't defend willful laziness.
it isn't developed as well as Atlas (from a philosophical point of view) but it is much better at building interesting characters that aren't so archetypal. I find Dominique fascinating, as well as Toohey. In general, I feel both Roark and Galt are somewhat undeveloped, unemotional characters. I think it is intentional. But Dominque and Toohey? there's some great character development right there. Motivations are strongly apparent without the omniscient definitions of who they are. there was still some of that in FH, but less. I often recommend people read the Fountainhead first before tackling AS. My husband reread it recently, and I enjoyed his reading to me outloud certain passages as I was careening down a very unforgiving long highway with no shoulders and plenty of curves and cliffs.
I suppose that someone, somewhere, has counted the sex scenes in both. I wonder which one has more?
Both novels were written at a time when authors were just starting to experiment with sex scenes in their work. Nobody knew yet what would actually work. The sex scenes in Atlas seem (to me) to fit into the plot. The sex in Fountainhead seemed, at the time I read it, just plain weird.
However, I did not know at that time that Ayn Rand actually had a sexual ethos that she wanted to communicate; I thought it was just more of the same mindless, gratuitous sex that you see in pretty much everywhere except for the works of Robert A. Heinlein (who was clearly communicating a sexual ethos). And that stuff bores me.
I'm betting that most of the people (and strangely, most seem to have been girls) who read Atlas in high school did so for the sex scenes and never got the novel's message.
Hence my comment about The Fountainhead -- I don't remember the sex therein very well (because, remember, _reading_ that garbage bores me; I'd rather be... uh, never mind), but I have a vague recollection of there being more of it, or it being a lot weirder, or some such thing.
I know you weren't expecting such a cerebral response. Sorry about that, sometimes I just can't help it!
I barely noticed the sex scenes in Atlas...they were short and tame and infrequent.... Can't imagine that being a book to go to for that purpose. Maybe I'll notice the "weird" ones in FH.
Well, I was a teenager in the Sixties, and the girls I knew who were reading it were older than me.
Considering that really tame stuff such as Catcher In the Rye and Lady Chatterly's Lover were about all that we kids had those days for titillation, I suppose that AS was enough to fit the bill.
ok, BS. you had Ullyses by Joyce, you had everything by DH Lawrence and The Rainbow is way better than Lover, You had 18th century Fanny Hill, you had THE BIBLE
Be sure to clank your chains at me if we end up in the same Gulag... for our Hooliganism...
Change it back...it was funnier the way it was!!!!
You're a funny little widget!
Never mind. Not going there.
But THAT he would like...it's already been established.
that was good
It reminds me SO much of... trying to remember his name-- Gail Wynand's rag in The Fountainhead. I hope I got his name right.
Perhaps if I read it again, I'll be able to appreciate it a bit more the 2nd time around.
Driving cliff roads SUCK! Being read to is nice though :)
Both novels were written at a time when authors were just starting to experiment with sex scenes in their work. Nobody knew yet what would actually work. The sex scenes in Atlas seem (to me) to fit into the plot. The sex in Fountainhead seemed, at the time I read it, just plain weird.
However, I did not know at that time that Ayn Rand actually had a sexual ethos that she wanted to communicate; I thought it was just more of the same mindless, gratuitous sex that you see in pretty much everywhere except for the works of Robert A. Heinlein (who was clearly communicating a sexual ethos). And that stuff bores me.
I'm betting that most of the people (and strangely, most seem to have been girls) who read Atlas in high school did so for the sex scenes and never got the novel's message.
Hence my comment about The Fountainhead -- I don't remember the sex therein very well (because, remember, _reading_ that garbage bores me; I'd rather be... uh, never mind), but I have a vague recollection of there being more of it, or it being a lot weirder, or some such thing.
I know you weren't expecting such a cerebral response. Sorry about that, sometimes I just can't help it!
Considering that really tame stuff such as Catcher In the Rye and Lady Chatterly's Lover were about all that we kids had those days for titillation, I suppose that AS was enough to fit the bill.
Nowadays -- yeah. Pretty tame.
Well, maybe that blows my theory all to hell.