Plot Holes, by Robert Gore
The real story isn’t Russia. Do you mount a “soft coup” over policy differences when, after all the Washington give and take, those policies will, at worst, marginally affect your influence, power, and payola? Doubtful. (Keep in mind Trump wants to increase military budgets.) If, on the other hand, you’re facing complete disgrace and ruin, including a long stretch in a penal institution, there’s nothing you won’t do to save yourself.
This is an excerpt. For the complete article, please click the link above.
This is an excerpt. For the complete article, please click the link above.
We have seen often, because of their brain sets instead of mind sets that their plans are of mice instead of men, this comes as a result of their basic dishonesty which causes them to constantly trip over their own foot steps. It's a game of ego's and less a game of idiotology.
They are, you must remember, the Great Unwashed, constantly avoiding measured inspection for fear they are unwanted.
Metaphorically rat-tat-tat speaking, of course.
Switching from a mob murder scene-~
Priest: "Do you renounce Satan?"
Michael Corleone: "Yes."
~switching to yet another mob murder scene.
Why? The word "anything" seems technically incorrect. If he wants to get things done roughly in the way the gov't leaders have done things in the past, he can work within the existing power structure. If he wants to a radical change of some sort, he has to put up with resistance. It doesn't matter if the change is good or bad.
If we're talking about investigating crimes, which crimes?
This all seems so incredibly nebulous. Specific would be: President Trump wants policy A. Official B had been committing crime C. Policy A puts B at risk getting caught for having done C. So President Trump must confront B directly or cut a deal with B assuring he won't get caught.
What is nebulous about dirty and corrupt people in Washington who are scared to death that Trump may investigate them and who are doing everything they can to stymie and depose him? I don't know how I could have put any simpler than I did, and you're going off on trivial tangents.
Sorry I'm slow to get it.
For one of the earliest, and still one of the best, exposures of the Warren Commission fraud, check out Mark Lane's Rush to Judgment, in which he uses the Warren Report itself to discredit the commission. More speculative is The Man Who Killed Kennedy, by Roger Stone, but it also makes mincemeat of the government's story. Once mincemeat is made, one must confront the terrible probabilities that the assassination was a conspiracy and probably a coup.
More currently, the Clintons are clearly up to their eyeballs in illicit and illegal garbage, and have been since their Arkansas days. For a good book on that, see Ron Brown's Body, by Jack Cashill. Check the index for the name Tom Parsons; he's a close friend of my brother's and he was in fact railroaded in the way the book says he was. The book raises the strong possibility that Ron Brown and the other people in the plane were murdered to stop Ron Brown from exposing the Clinton's many illegal fundraising schemes.
What I'm saying is that the federal government has been deeply corrupt for a long time. I can give you much more material if you'd like, but what I've mentioned would constitute a good start. Does President Trump have specific knowledge of crimes? Undoubtedly some of them, and vigorous investigation on a variety of fronts will yield abundant evidence that he can use both as leverage and as a way to get rid of people intent on discrediting him and making it impossible for him to implement any part of his agenda. This is a big part of contemporary politics--get as much incriminating information as you can on both your friends and enemies. People tend to respond more agreeably to threats of prison and ruination than they do to logical argument. As I said in my article, President Trump has vast powers to investigate and prosecute, and I'm fairly certain he will use them to his full advantage. If he doesn't and leaves the corrupt elements of the Deep State in place, they will destroy his presidency, as they are clearly trying to do now.
Our experiment was based on individual rights and freedom with the most minimal government to help preserve them. There are hundreds of societies experimenting with different concepts so by observation we should be able to see which has performed best and how adaption of less successful principles has advanced or retarded our progress. Drain the swamp.
Could I summarize your claim as saying there is a great deal of crime in the gov't and covering up one another's crimes in not just an occasional thing but is something that an informal institution within the gov't does? The nature of this criminal institution is that it's made up of people who hold legal levers of gov't power, but they're using them illegally for the benefit of members of the cabal.
Assuming all this were true, how did the cabal and President Trump become bitter enemies. The very nature of the cabal is it works with people who control legal levers of power, like the POTUS. So why are the cabal and President Trump enemies?
Clinton was supposed to be a shoe in and with her losing. The state dept where she presided is laden with her dealings. The deep state started to panic after Podesto's emails revealed a crude evil
Ritual that is insane to the average person. From that story "fake news" was introduced to give the
Impression that their deplorable morals were just made up stories. Trump maybe the other side to play or maybe not it , seems as if he is the cabals
Enemy but actions and time will tell. Heads may roll.