data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ed385/ed38521fbf7b40380cae712d44ca18c82217e557" alt="Galt's Gulch"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/61bbc/61bbcc8746d999c2b59402eed5ca941d8d01bbe3" alt="Galt's Gulch"
- Hot
- New
- Categories...
- Producer's Lounge
- Producer's Vault
- The Gulch: Live! (New)
- Ask the Gulch!
- Going Galt
- Books
- Business
- Classifieds
- Culture
- Economics
- Education
- Entertainment
- Government
- History
- Humor
- Legislation
- Movies
- News
- Philosophy
- Pics
- Politics
- Science
- Technology
- Video
- The Gulch: Best of
- The Gulch: Bugs
- The Gulch: Feature Requests
- The Gulch: Featured Producers
- The Gulch: General
- The Gulch: Introductions
- The Gulch: Local
- The Gulch: Promotions
- Marketplace
- Members
- Store
- More...
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/fr/116...
+1
I resent having to pay for Obama to have a Presidential Library, when I don't get to have a Presidential Library.
I also find it interesting that an object, a float in a parade, is labeled as "disrespecful". It's constructors, maybe - I don't know them. It, itself, cannot have a viewpoint.
If it starts to show one, I'm going to run.
And this "Presidential Library" is far less of an insult to the office of the President than everyone at every level of government and media looking the other way while the office is occupied by someone who is not qualified to hold it.
Article 2, section 1, clause 5.