Me old dino has a Dilbert cartoon desk calendar directly beside my keyboard here.
I'm still voting for the profane bull in a china shop, who I knew was a far cry from Mr. Perfect from the get-go.
Bad Hair Day may talk dirty about women and what he'd like to do when just around guys, but from what I've seen he's always polite when he talks to women one-on-one.
What he is not is a rapist or the enabler of a rapist.
The big ugly mess that's unfolding may turn out to be a good thing if you're all for keeping an evil hag from becoming the best president money can bribe for stuff like wide open borders or keeping your yap shut about women all but kept in bondage.
At the end of the first debate an o so noble The Donald expressed reluctance to say things he didn't say with Chelsea looking on.
Right away me dino was thinking how the hell does this puddinghead thinks he's gonna win doing that?
The reason the bullish blowhard is the candidate this time around is because he is no Mitt Romney, Rev. Huckabee, nicey nice Ben Carson or Sir Jeb of the Royal House of Bush.
Dastardly Donald is not going to beat Shillary's mudslinging, especially when hit by accurate splats, by pretending to be some little goody two-shoes Mr. Nice Guy that he just plain is not.
The evil hag is not some normal woman you're polite to or civil with who comes walking up to your campaign bus. Even if you have your impure thoughts.
Shillary needs to be--and deserves to be--exposed and trashed for the corrupt loathsome creature that she is on stage in front of the whole world on TV tonight.

As a college educated female, I have never asked who endorsed whom to dictate for whom I would vote. I do my own homework! Do I care what "Mr Dilbert" does, or Ryan, and certainly not McCain! I would never throw my vote away to Johnson, he is an unniformed flake (I am from N. M.), and he has no strong group of people to put in place who do know what he lacks. I would never vote for Hillary, she is as crooked as they come and would stack the Supreme Court.making bjectivism impossible. These people squawking the loudest, are probably guilty of things far worse them what Trump said 11 years ago. I know politicians who are definitely in that category, and it is par for the course in Hollywood. Don't be fooled that this goofy sexual harassment movement has changed anything, it has not. Only strong females with a demand for respect can change it. Hillary is not one of them, she is a crude, nasty weak woman, who bows to Bill's every scheme.

Very entertaining, and it has gems like this one:
"you can ignore all of it because reason is not part of decision-making when it comes to politics."

Objectivism + Politics = Frustration

Why He Endorsed Trump - changing from Clinton to Trump.
http://blog.dilbert.com/post/15091941...
"Fairness isn’t an objective quality of the universe. I oppose the estate tax because I was born to modest means and worked 7-days a week for most of my life to be in my current position. (I’m working today, Sunday, as per usual.) And I don’t want to give 75% of my earnings to the government. (Would you?)"

"And being chummy with Putin is more likely to keep us safe, whether you find that distasteful or not. Clinton wants to insult Putin into doing what we want. That approach seems dangerous as hell to me."

I suspect many of the supposed converts to Clinton/Johnson are making public declarations "just to get out of the blast zone," but will vote their instincts for Trump in the privacy of the voting booth.

Actually voting for Johnson is helping elect Hillary this time around. Johnson has NO chance of actually winning, due mostly to the crooked system we have for elections.

The president is commander in chief of the military, and his job primarily is to keep the country and its citizens safe. This is the real issue in this election; not the muckraking that is going on with the hillary campaign. What someone said 10-20 years ago is really not important. How they would handle foreign affairs, including military, is FAR more important.

Hillary has a string of failures in that arean, from how she handled sensitive information, to how she handled security at Benghazi, to how secretive she has been with the Clinton foundation dealings.

Obama/Clinton dealings have resulted in many failures and wasted efforts, gaining us nothing. What do we get from the Iran deal, except freeing them to advance their nuclear ambitions and grow their country at our expense.

We need a strong president, and thats Trump in this election. Whether people like him or not, he will do a far better job at making our country become great, and get respect on the world stage.

There was a saying popular with teens a number of years ago, "Gag me with a spoon." Prior to that it might have been, "Hasten Jason, fetch the basin."
So just when I thought the competition couldn't get any cruder or vomitus along comes Trump's "Boy talk" comments recorded 9 years or so ago. C'mon guys, we've all done it. If you say you never did you are the son of a strict preacher or the son of an orthodox rabbi. From middle school on, this kind of salacious talk has been common among "the guys" forever. Whoever heard of recording it? Only raw dog comedians. Don't be a liar, fess up. You either did it or were part of a group that did.
Please, gimme a break.

I transcribed an excerpt from Scott Adams' book in this post: https://www.galtsgulchonline.com/post...
He talks about how selfishness is a good thing, stuff that sounds inspired by Ayn Rand.

His cartoons are thinly masked anti-industrial mentality. I am surprised he was not a supporter of Hillary.

Do endorsements actually sway anyone's vote? I hope not! Sadly though, there are millions of sheep out there in the pasture who are no doubt looking for a shepherd to do their thinking for them.

He's a character the old Scott!

Scott Adams placed himself directly into the path of George Soros and Soros employees attacked him. Sadly he will find Soros has a long memory. You have to always kiss Soros rear as the Clintons and Bushes do.