Founder of ISIS
Posted by jimslag 8 years, 2 months ago to Government
Trump says he was joking about The Prez founding ISIS but a 2012 report from the Defense Intelligence Agency through the Pentagon says that this could happen well before it did. Lt. General Flynn thinks that the Administration made a willful decision to ignore and continue on their path of foreign intervention. So, it looks as if the Administration has no one to blame but themselves for the mess that they are in. I put this under Government because like President Reagan said, the government is the cause not the solution, or something like that.
http://mevs.org/files/tmp/ArabSpring....
provides some very interesting data on people's desires in Muslim countries. What this and most other documents fail to document is that while a significantly larger number of Muslims wanted more freedom, less religion, etc., they got the exact opposite in several North African countries, as well as throughout the Middle East.
For an interesting history of the Arab Spring, see
http://www.globalresearch.ca/the-arab...
and the books it reviews by Ahmed Bensaada: "L’Arabesque Américaine" and "Arabesque$". The roles that the State Department, the CIA, George Soros' Open Society Institute, and Google played in the Arab Spring are well-documented and even related to CIA involvements in Serbia, Georgia, Ukraine, and Kyrgyzstan.
Arguably, the goal of introducing more freedom into Muslim culture is in American self-interest. However, despite extensive planning outlined in the references above, in all countries in which the USA has intervened, covertly or overtly, for many decades, the net effect has been less freedom, more violence, and more oppressive, more Muslim regimes. This is precisely what Ron Paul means by blowback. Moreover, this is empirical evidence in support of the Objectivist stance of the use of force, and it should be championed as such.
He needs to explain how O the Great and Powerful ignored the advice of his generals by pulling out troops way too early. ISIS reared its ugly head as a result. That's not hard to explain. I'd also be saying that if Shillary was up all night during the Benghazi attack, why weren't the trapped Americans there ever sent any help. The key word here is "Incompetence."
Old dino's memory banks ain't as sharp as they used to be.
The person who creates an organization or a company is known as the founder. Founder is also a verb meaning "fail miserably," which is something a company's founder hopes the company will never do. https://www.vocabulary.com/dictionary...
Alleged Journalists, who are required in order to graduate must take some language specific courses to graduate. Columbia School of Journalism as one of its foundational classes teaches their graduates this:
https://journalism.columbia.edu/class...
M.A. Evidence and Inference
Nicholas LemannTali Woodward
“This fall M.A. course teaches a disciplined “journalistic method” of testing assumptions and hypotheses, recognizing the ways that stories can distort the truth and exploring how to make sure that reporting firmly proves its points.
Students also develop useful skills for working with statistics, conducting in-depth interviews and combining anecdote and narrative with the big picture in their writing.”
Did you notice? "...the ways that stories can distort the truth..."
Trump was, and I can say this as an uneducated moron, (with only a B.S IT, MBA, 19 industry IT certifications, Pilots License, Real Estate License, used to have CDL license to name some, and will have my teaching certificate in the next couple months), that even with my seriously limited intellect, and reasoning skills, understood the metaphorical references Trump was using, including the second amendment references.
A founder can also be a person who lays the foundation or provides the environment for an organization to take root and flourish in. Hillary and Obama were in that sense founders of ISIS, especially considering that the guns, vehicles, and other military hardware was scooped up by these people are what is used to attack us and our allies.
Trump is simply using basic common language, not the politically correct elitist speak and it is driving all these elitists completely insane. Trump is stripping the pedestal the elitists have placed themselves on as the intellectual keepers of knowledge and action where they believe they should be above everyone else telling everyone else what to do, how to think, how to speak, how to act. Trump is tearing that all down, and it is about time.
Trump is speaking to the average common person, who by the way, are educated and intelligent but just refuse to bow to the politically correct way of putting things. I for one refuse to be politically correct even though if I put half an ounce of effort can rattle off plenty of big words to make myself look important and portray a semblance of superiority that is not warranted.
This is one reason I ignore, for the most part, what the media bashes Trump for. I understand his simple talk, and the deeper complex metaphorical discussion and I think a lot of people are really waking up to this also which is why the polls that have been taken since the conventions are completely skewed toward Hillary. Take for example this poll. Which was done and released today 8/14/2016:
https://www.scribd.com/document/32114...
Read the questions, they also do not tell you what the distribution of Democrat to Republican to Independent is. The New Hampshire section when asked if they would vote Hillary was really fascinating especially when you look at women. 81% of men and 81% of women answer no they never would. Trump’s responses were 85% men, and 91% women said no, but then you have a contradictory number below, when you break down Democrat vs. GOP. Basically in all these polls their numbers do not really seem to add up, and it seems that they are polling far more democrats than republicans. The Pollsters are skewing the narrative, along with the media, Hillary is spending hundreds of millions in non-stop ads against Trump and the polls given all these facts are still within the margin of error.
So from observation, and assessment it seems to me that is all things were equal Trump would be crushing Hillary everyone, which is what I actually think is happening. This also lends credibility to Trump’s claims that 1) everything is rigged, and 2) better watch in November, because if Hillary wins. There was probably massive cheating just to make it happen.
Think about Obama’s elections. How do you have entire counties, around Philadelphia where there is not even one vote cast for Romney in 2008 and 2012? Really not one single vote? If it were just one country in one state I might believe it, but this occurred in numerous counties in several states. Coincidence. I think not.
So Obama and Hillary founder of ISIS. "OH YEAH" In the abstract most certainly.
But I didn't.
jimslag, in my version I wrote, save for pretty similar start that you wrote upstairs, something more~
This is what happens when a civilian president completely ignores the advice of generals professionally trained to study war strategy and tactics.
Ask Adolf Hitler. Oops, never mind. His narcissistic imagined strategic genius forced to shoot himself in a bunker.
And so much for little Barry proving that he actually deserved that Noble Peace Prize lobbed at him as fast as he first entered the Oval Office for stuff he said as a candidate.
I've read of military personnel at King Barry's WH being treated shabbily.
Are you a fellow once a Marine always a Marine? (I was a draftee but I was able to turn that lemon into lemonade once I got past Parris Island).
Try- Patron.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/15/wor...
The left seizes on the shot-from-the-lip comments, and the stream of consciousness comments of Trump, but the thousands who attend his rallies understand him. He doesn't need to Photoshop the crowds to make them look bigger like CNN does for Hillary. She gets small crowds, he gets big crowds, yet he's behind in the polls. Something is screwy.