Galt's Gulch

Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by LetsShrug 12 years, 1 month ago
    So having a polite vocabulary and sticking to certain principles is something to question or make fun of? Respectability is no longer respectable.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    -
  • Posted by $ jmlesniewski 12 years, 1 month ago
    The question here is why a person speaks a certain way. It's nice to see someone control his words, but is it being done off of rational principles? In Romney's case, I'm not so sure it is.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
      -
    • Posted by LetsShrug 12 years, 1 month ago
      Why? Because he's religious?
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        -
      • Posted by $ jmlesniewski 12 years, 1 month ago
        There's not enough in the article for me to make a valid assessment of what his rhetorical principles are. However, I think it is rational to swear sometimes, so inductively I think that someone who goes to such great links to never swear isn't operating based on a rational principle.

        There is also the mitigating factor of him being a politician, so it's impossible to know how he speaks in his private life.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
          -
        • Posted by LetsShrug 12 years, 1 month ago
          It's rational to swear? That idea does not apply to everyone. Some people think it's irrational to swear so it isn't "going to great lengths (links?)" to not swear whatsoever. Perhaps this kind of principle is becoming extinct...younger people swear more than those from an older generation... from back when swearing wasn't a polite thing to do (back when politeness counted). I remember them, perhaps you do not.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
            -
          • Posted by $ jmlesniewski 12 years, 1 month ago
            "It's rational to swear" and "It's rational to swear sometimes" are two different statements. I said the latter.

            And yes, links instead of lengths was a typo.
            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
              -
            • Posted by LetsShrug 12 years, 1 month ago
              "It's rational to swear sometimes" for some people, and it's irrational to swear at all for others. But really, who cares who swears or how often? The man has some decorum, and perhaps some restraint. It's a sign of strength, not weakness. It's all good. :)
              Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                -
              • Posted by $ jmlesniewski 12 years, 1 month ago
                I disagree with your statement "it's irrational to swear at all for others." I stand by my claim "it is rational to swear sometimes."

                I also do not agree that it's a sign of strength to not swear. Saying so is the same argument that it's a sign of strength to not have sex.

                The question is not how often is something being done, but why it is being done. Hence my conclusion, it is rational to swear sometimes. In other words, there is a rational reason to swear in certain contexts.

                A person's manner of speech is part of how he represents himself. When judging a person, it is a criterion to consider.
                Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo