The Worst President In History: The Legacy of Barack Obama
writing friend of mine has out a new book for pre-order-here's what he has to say: "This book is the product of four years of research, and documents 200 reasons why Obama ranks at the bottom of all U.S. Presidents. I’ve set the pre-order price at a mere 99 cents, a real bargain for such a thoroughly documented book, but my goal is to make sure as many people read as possible!"
1. The fundamentalist revolution in Iran, and the hostage crisis happened while he was in office.
2. Gave away the panama canal
3. Energy/Oil crisis
4. Stagflation with the accompanying insane interest rates.
I am unclear of the details on who allowed him back into Iran, since he had sought asylum in France? at the time.
http://www.thenewamerican.com/culture...
Foggy Bottom Fairies at their finest moments.
Whom else would be happier to pay for the demise of the U.S. ?
The US favored surgical shears shoved in the back of the neck then the brain sliced and diced into mush. Until the practice of abortion during birth was stopped. At some point a womans right to choose turned into murder of a citizen. A point lost on the left. But then they probably didn't have any of us soldiers left to kill off for nothing. in their fascist wars.
Add it up yourself. US military killed in wars started by Democrats versus those started by Reublicans. Don't go back past Korea. That' will get you 18 to 1. Add in WWI and WWI 'it hundreds to one. So much for socialist mendacity. Most blood thirsty war mongers on the planet other than their friends in Russia and China.
That's what objective facts will do for you. Creates a very clear picture of real history. Give peace a chance? Easy kill a Democrat. Who by the way have yet to comply with the war powers act. Moot point now the Republicans have joined them I suppose.
It took me YEARS to resolve why the Democrats were some of the most fervent haters of Communist China & the USSR back in the 70s and 80s (..and in to the 90s culminating with Tienamen Square). It bothered me to wonder why the UK and other socialistic governments were hardest on the Communist regimes,especially as they seemed to approximate their own ideological utopias.
Finally figured it all out one day.
His State Department destroyed lots of lives of the locals most of whom were dead set against the give away.
They approved the in country vote much of which was falsified.
They falsified the treat itself in a number of ways. One stated a US Citizen employee of the Canal Zone Government or Company after the treat was signed would pay no taxes on any employment income. This was said to stop a rush for the border and keep qualified people on hand for the 20 year hand over period.l Also Panama citizens would continue to pay no taxes to the USA. which didn't apploy anyway.
They lied.
It went to court up to circuit level and the argument was 'that was technical language to keep US citizens from paying taxes to Panama.
The reason was to ensure we would keep our mouths shut about the faults in the treaty.
As a result many locals lost there retirement.
Another was ensuring that any US Citizen employee or not arrested in Panama would be reported to the US Embassy within 24 hours and have their US Civil rights etc. . Sounds good?
Panama was under Napoleonic Code . Police had no arrest powers. They could only detain pending completion of investigation. Same thing same jail and it might take six or so months.
So a drug running dictator took overe and then got dumped, literally out of a helicopter, and replaced by a worse dictator and the funny part is they never gave it to the real owners. That would be the country of Columbia.
On a bright note the Panamanians after that have cleaned up the place a lot put in a good infrastructure, and got the Chinese to pay for it.
Something else the US State Department couldn't manage.
Jimmy wasn't allowed to see much of the area even denied helicopter fly over rights in the zone itself. Too many Panamanians were after his ass when the saw there future as dictrated by El Cacahuate Jimmy Carter and even with the military and the police on full alert (US assets) thought the risk was far to great.
For the locals going back and forth on the train they provided a 30 minute one man search of the cars and engine.
I can first hand attest to that. The report said. While nothing untoward or out of place was noticed there are no guarantees due to the limited time allowed for the search.
Side note in history.
He maiy not have killed as many but it wasn't from lack of not caring.
Every election exceeds the idiocy of the previous election.
On the destruction side he does have some competition for the title of "best" as well, Woodrow Wilson and FDR for instance.
There are plenty of traitors to blame.
LBJ - Escalated Vietnam but most destructive of all started the whole diversity/multiculturalism farce. With the assistance of Edward Kennedy changed the immigration sources from western cultures to anywhere but. Leading to what we are beginning to truly experience now...balkanization... anyone think that is a good outcome?
Every president has made some decisions we have judged as mistakes with the benefit of hindsight. Many innocently, but not always.
What really happened besides a giant cluster flock? Read the article indicated above.
Personally I listened the broadcasts of the US Navy aircraft stating there was. a. no NVN craft in the area and b. the US ships were themselves across the line.
According to a study I just read, Obama is the 5th best president in history. Here is the full list:
1. Reagan & Lincoln tied for first,
2. Twenty three presidents tied for second,
3. Seventeen other presidents tied for third,
4. Jimmy Carter came in fourth, and
5. Obama came in fifth.
That creepy sight let me know that this creature feature for an all powerful socialist POTUS had a lot more problems than I previously thought.
And I previously thought he already had a freaking lot of problems.
...fill in the blanks!!
I've dabbled in oil painting for decades as well as worked with chemical color dye manufacturing professionally. I have a pretty decent understanding of pigments, dyes, and color creation using same. Before you accuse someone else of having an issue with logic, perhaps you should check your own premises first.
.
I want ink on paper!
I am happy to pay for it, Dag nab it! :)
Regards,
O.A.
Thank you kindly.
Regards,
O.A.
LOL. Yeah.. that would be me. :) You should see my CNC tool and die shop and my computer network.
No. I am building a library that would withstand an EMP and other contingencies... Farenhiet 451 you know... :)
I intend to leave my library to someone that will appreciate it. No batteries required.
"I cannot live without books! Thomas Jefferson
Regards,
O.A.
I like both formats for different reasons. Old books feel great and can take abuse that electronic ones can't. OTOH, I like to read myself to sleep using my phone and an epub book. Don't need a light on to keep me from drifting off and the phone just sleeps a few minutes after I do.
A toast to good books!!! [clink]
Thank you. I like the feel and the smell of them too. :)
Regards,
O.A.
In the words of Alex Epstein FOF or FOC if you can guess what the means. Credit to dwlievert !
Thanks
M. Aarethun
.
FOF!
Load more comments...