- Hot
- New
- Categories...
- Producer's Lounge
- Producer's Vault
- The Gulch: Live! (New)
- Ask the Gulch!
- Going Galt
- Books
- Business
- Classifieds
- Culture
- Economics
- Education
- Entertainment
- Government
- History
- Humor
- Legislation
- Movies
- News
- Philosophy
- Pics
- Politics
- Science
- Technology
- Video
- The Gulch: Best of
- The Gulch: Bugs
- The Gulch: Feature Requests
- The Gulch: Featured Producers
- The Gulch: General
- The Gulch: Introductions
- The Gulch: Local
- The Gulch: Promotions
- Marketplace
- Members
- Store
- More...
The way I see it, this is basically like any political scandal that's happened where say, someone has an affair--the only reason people are so mad at him is because he got caught. There's no reason to think Sterling is alone in his thinking, either in the NBA or elsewhere on the planet. But it's morally wrong to basically engage in thought policing like this. It's like as a culture we--or I should say *they*--have come to accept this sort of thing without even blinking. This surveillance state, I mean.
In short, two wrongs don't make a right. Do I think Sterling should've been allowed to continue to own the team? I don't know. I don't know enough about his activities as a team owner to make that call. But I definitely wouldn't make that call based on that tape. Because that tape really wasn't any of my business.