ok, luken, I think I'm going to take you on in this. 1. if the business wants to offer happy endings and has demand, what should we care? 2. this is exactly the kind of legislating morality stuff I find reduces liberty. like prohibition and the ATF. It's inefficient as well. 3. The country has no right to make me a criminal because I exchanged sex for money or money for sex as long as we are consenting adults. 4. only each individual can accurately assess the risks involved including relationship risks. 5.why should the exchange of money and commercial location be immoral but sex in a private home without exchanging money moral? I just like to flush these things out, because legislating morality is a slippery slope in my opinion. :)
I'm not going to argue with you. I wouldn't want the government interfering with this. I think it should be up to the states. They've actually legalized prostitution in most states, they just call it marriage. My wife wants money for the mall, I want sex, fair trade :)
lol "Altruism declares that any action taken for the benefit of others is good, and any action taken for one’s own benefit is evil. Thus the beneficiary of an action is the only criterion of moral value—and so long as that beneficiary is anybody other than oneself, anything goes." I am stuck on action taken for one's benefit, would imply an exchange of value. "for free" would imply no exchange of value, so you correct. pity sex.
I came up with a saying when I was in school and still use it today. I don't care if you're laughing with me or if you're laughing at me, just as long as your laughing. :)
2. this is exactly the kind of legislating morality stuff I find reduces liberty. like prohibition and the ATF. It's inefficient as well.
3. The country has no right to make me a criminal because I exchanged sex for money or money for sex as long as we are consenting adults.
4. only each individual can accurately assess the risks involved including relationship risks.
5.why should the exchange of money and commercial location be immoral but sex in a private home without exchanging money moral?
I just like to flush these things out, because legislating morality is a slippery slope in my opinion. :)
In high school another girl and I picked legalizing prostitution for a special assignment in government class. We both got an F
"Altruism declares that any action taken for the benefit of others is good, and any action taken for one’s own benefit is evil. Thus the beneficiary of an action is the only criterion of moral value—and so long as that beneficiary is anybody other than oneself, anything goes."
I am stuck on action taken for one's benefit, would imply an exchange of value. "for free" would imply no exchange of value, so you correct. pity sex.
Now, Algore has a chance to be called "Crazed Sex Pekingese"!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r8L3_I4SW...
http://m.youtube.com/#/watch?v=REvmhBO99...
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x219sr_...