Hillary Clinton Says America Has ‘Too Many Guns’
I'm glad to see that she has not forgotten her old talking points. I hope that she soon gets back to the "vast right-wing conspiracy".
- Hot
- New
- Categories...
- Producer's Lounge
- Producer's Vault
- The Gulch: Live! (New)
- Ask the Gulch!
- Going Galt
- Books
- Business
- Classifieds
- Culture
- Economics
- Education
- Entertainment
- Government
- History
- Humor
- Legislation
- Movies
- News
- Philosophy
- Pics
- Politics
- Science
- Technology
- Video
- The Gulch: Best of
- The Gulch: Bugs
- The Gulch: Feature Requests
- The Gulch: Featured Producers
- The Gulch: General
- The Gulch: Introductions
- The Gulch: Local
- The Gulch: Promotions
- Marketplace
- Members
- Store
- More...
Copy link or image.
Post whichever works for you...
:)
A service of plusaf.com.
You're welcome...
I would have gotten back sooner but had some surgery yesterday and it was a bad day. Op was fine, but recovery from anesthesia was nasty. Recovering fine now.
I started physical therapy for my left shoulder's damage repair. My operation was about 5-6 weeks ago to repair a lot of damage I sustained in a fall back in November. PT will probably go for another 3-4 months or more.
Luckily, I can get by with my right wing for now, and the left one seems to be healing quite rapidly for an old fart of my age...
Hang in there!
Mine is esophagus problems. Biopsies say I don't have cancer, so I dodged that bullet. This was the first of 3 or 4 procedures. It sucks when it hurts to swallow Jello after the op, but the doc says that will pass in a few days. Kinda makes you not want to go on to 2-3 and possibly 4, but I'm going to "git er done".
Who does that describe?
"To protect and defend the Constitution of the United States of America against all enemies foreign and DOMESTIC......I take this oath freely without purposes of ecasion." Ring Ring Ring..
But not if she can foment a revolution instead of a counter revolution.
of defense IS these guns which she hates! -- j
.
2) Cops really CANT get there and prevent damage, even if they hire more of them
3) Personal security guards are too expensive for everyone to get one
4) Not everyone is some 200 pound bruiser trained in martial arts who will intimidate any potential attacker
5) If someone points a gun at you, you can be killed even if you ARE a 200 lb bruiser.
4) So guns are a cost effective method of personal safety.
END OF DISCUSSION, HILLARY
With 80 million gun owners and 350 million firearms in circulation, I think the idea of stuffing all of that toothpaste back into the tube is delusional, but there are those who will try.
Even New York has found that gun owners simply refused to comply with a new law that required them to register all removable magazines. Noticeably, there has been no state action taken against the "refuseniks". That might have been because most law enforcement in the state was very open about how they felt the law was unconstitutional, and that the strain on their resources did not justify neglecting higher priority activities.
Even President Obama has pointed out how unworkable the idea of registering all guns and confiscating them would be. Most of the Clinton bluster is window dressing to collect the votes of the most extreme anti-gun voters.
Any attack on the gun-owning American populace will likely start with an assault on the gun companies and the gun sellers, with the aid of a compliant activist judiciary. What's currently standing in the way of that effort is a right-centrist national legislature that may have to finally show some courage and stop the acts of an unconstitutional imperial Presidency.
I agree that its unlikely the cops would do a house to house search for guns so they could be confiscated. Imagine how long it would take to find all the carefully hidden guns !!!! Theres always the PVC safe deposit box in the back yard garden too.
This is sadly standard practice. There are all kinds of laws on the books. Everyone's probably violating at least one of them. Police officers usually use common sense and focus on crimes where people are hurting others or stealing. They're not going to bother people for some unregistered clip, driving five mph over, their kids not having bike helmet, an expired car seat (did you know they expire?), smoking weed or using someone else's prescription drugs, and so on. But if someone in gov't is against the citizen, they have an apparently legitimate reason to go after them. Rule of law becomes a fig leaf for rule of men.
The numbers also are duplicated. For example total killed with a weapon includes child deaths but child is a legal term meaning under 21.
The figure also conveniently forgets gang on gang violence
Hillarious Hillary's misuse of statistics is somewhere below the level of her misuse of required security regulations or put another way her intentional violations of laws is far more a danger to the country along with her disdain for the truth as ordinary people define the word.
Truth we shouldn't ignore any problem but since the entire program was put in place by the left perhaps we can andshould ignore Hillary and the left wing socialist fascists whoever they are really for and and answering to in their organization.
that's how you don't dangle two participles at once. .
But I see Obummer gutting the military and setting up the left in the Pentagon. I know a 4-star that was a fine American at one point, but somehow has been turned. Seems like a nice person but is an Obummer puppet and is now serving the Hildebeast. Very sad and upsetting personally, but this is really happening.
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." Jefferson
Hillary, you can say whatever you want, but if you make statements like that one without specifically describing "How many are Too Many" or "How many are 'enough' ..." Your comment is useless as an argument and basically intellectual bullshit.
But "thanks for sharing," anyway...:)
Of course if she really feels this way. Let me suggest that she disarm her armed bodyguards, as a step towards disarming America.
strong criminals could just strangle victims, or
rape them, through sheer superior, brute physical
strength.
A gun, as my late father said, is"an equalizer". It puts the one who is physically weak on the
same level as the one who is physically strong.
It can also help in the case of being outnum-
bered. I have no sympathy for those who spew
the slime-smeared sentimentality about how
unsafe people make it when they try to defend
themselves.
However if you follow the initials DOHS is now DHS pronounced did and that is certainly true next step is Department of Internal Security followed by inserting the word State.
As much as we were shocked over Reno using tanks against little kids thus the name Jackboot Janet Von Flamethrower Reno I can't imagine what a 'civil disobedience rally' would cause with Clinton giving the orders.
She would endorse the Communist Manifesto if she thought it would help get her elected. The issue is not guns, but the fact that Hillary R. Clinton doesn't rise to the level of a whore.
What she wants is a dictatorship. She wants the "pen and cell phone" power her adored fearless leader has. She wants to make law by dictate.
She needs to go. ALL these "Dynasty-seekers" need to go. If they don't... what will "go" is the America we used to know, and it will indeed go - into the wastebin of history.
I'm in the process of stocking up on ammo for the guns I already have.
Maybe I should also stock up on gasoline and (hick) plenty of easy to break wine bottles.
Ah, that reminds me, I also need to acquire deadly projectile weapons that are not guns.
I hope you're wrong, but I would not be shocked. My wild guess is the issue doesn't matter to her as it does to you and me; she thinks the sound bite will give warm fuzzies to someone who isn't into guns but knew a few people they didn't like who were into guns. Then she says something about respecting the Second Amendment for a soundbite for people like me who care about that right.
To get votes, politicians need to get urbanites who are into biking to work and museums (me) and rural people who are into guns and motor sports made at one another. Even if the national parks, for example, are plenty big enough to support wildlife and ATVs/snowmobiles; they get elected by getting the two groups fired up fighting over whether parks will be used for one or the other.
It's really sad that this stratagem comes before Constitutional right's, but that's what I suspect is happening.
None of this sounds like respect for the Second Amendment to me.
She is a political opportunist, who will say anything to gain power.
Load more comments...