- Hot
- New
- Categories...
- Producer's Lounge
- Producer's Vault
- The Gulch: Live! (New)
- Ask the Gulch!
- Going Galt
- Books
- Business
- Classifieds
- Culture
- Economics
- Education
- Entertainment
- Government
- History
- Humor
- Legislation
- Movies
- News
- Philosophy
- Pics
- Politics
- Science
- Technology
- Video
- The Gulch: Best of
- The Gulch: Bugs
- The Gulch: Feature Requests
- The Gulch: Featured Producers
- The Gulch: General
- The Gulch: Introductions
- The Gulch: Local
- The Gulch: Promotions
- Marketplace
- Members
- Store
- More...
What a racist, muslim surprise!
I almost wrote "socialist" before I considered the Chinese not cooperating by turning off their smokestacks. Keep those exports flowing!
"GWPF Welcomes Non-Binding And Toothless Un Climate Deal
"London 12 December: Dr Benny Peiser, the director of the Global Warming Policy Forum (GWPF), has welcomed the non-binding and toothless UN climate agreement which was adopted in Paris tonight.
"Dr Peiser said:
“'The Paris agreement is another acknowledgement of international reality. The deal is further proof, if any was needed, that the developing world will not agree to any legally binding caps, never mind reductions of their CO2 emissions.'
"'As seasoned observers predicted, the Paris deal is based on a voluntary basis which allows nations to set their own voluntary CO2 targets and policies without any legally binding caps or international oversight.'
'In contrast to the Kyoto Protocol, the Paris deal removes all legal obligations for governments to cap or reduce CO2 emissions. This voluntary agreement also removes the mad rush into unrealistic decarbonisation policies that are both economically and politically unsustainable.'”
that the numbers which are in use are bogus. . and this
agreement is also bogus. . Thank You! -- j
.
But I would still advise any right-thinking Senator to refuse concurrence on this treaty.
Like almost all of their efforts...their doomed to failure and I too am temporarily "satisfied".
They will take money from ordinary people in wealthy countries and give it to wealthy people in poor countries who will build overpriced, unreliable renewable energy projects which will produce power too expensive for ordinary poor people there to buy. This will only happen after the UN bureaucrats, corrupt governments and dictators line their own pockets.
$100 Billion/yr. can line a lot of pockets.
There you have it folks. Socialism at it's finest!!!
That's a relief!
That's a relief!
"The night saw an ugly brawl as US secretary of state John Kerry threatened that developed countries, including the US, would walk out of the agreement if it help up the wall of differentiation or if it was asked to commit to a road-map or a goal to deliver on its financial obligations in the Paris agreement. 'You can take the US out of this. Take the developed world out of this. Remember, the Earth has a problem. What will you do with the problem on your own?' he said behind closed doors in negotiations to other ministers on the second revised draft of the Paris agreement...
"Making a veiled threat again that the agreement could fail if the US was pushed for financial obligations, Kerry said, 'At this late hour, hope we don’t load this with differentiation…I would love to have a legally binding agreement. But the situation in the US is such that legally binding with respect to finance is a killer for the agreement'...
"In the past the developed countries have been unable to deliver financial flows against their commitments of providing US $ 100 billion annually by 2020. The OECD produced a report recently claiming the rich world had delivered US $ 62 billion by 2014 which the rich countries showed off at the Paris talks. But developing countries, including India, noted gross levels of double accounting and counting of high interest loans as climate finance – which is seen as a reparation cost. The developing countries asked that a road-map for delivery of the US $ 100 billion be fixed at Paris and that the accounting rules too be set by the UN climate convention blocking attempts of creative accounting by developed countries. This was partially reflected in the second revised draft of the Paris agreement." [emphasis added]
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2015/...
Don't know why you got dinged. +1