Objectivism chart in Word, I hope

Posted by johnpe1 9 years ago to Philosophy
5 comments | Share | Best of... | Flag

if this works, it'll be the first one for me!

this is the chart from Zen's post "Philosophy On
One Foot ...." -- j
.


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by ewv 9 years ago
    There are a lot of problems with that chart. It doesn't represent and confuses the essentials and the structure as Ayn Rand presented them. A later revision of the chart made some important corrections, but not enough.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ HeroWorship 9 years ago
      Would you care to be more specific? I am curious what you think it fails to represent and what it confuses.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by ewv 9 years ago
        Maybe it would be better to wait to see if the corrected version is posted. But to start off, both of them show ethics as based on a foundation of metaphysics and epistemology in parallel. Ayn Rand structured her explanation linearly as metaphysics > epistemology > ethics > politics. The nature of knowledge and how we know depends on some fundamental facts about the nature of existence in the broadest sense. She used the familiar 'A is A' axiom as a constant reminder everywhere, but its full meaning is the axiomatic concept of identity as part of the foundation of the nature of knowledge (see Introduction to Objectivist Epistemology), not just a general reminder.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ HeroWorship 9 years ago
    The thing I appreciate about this chart is that it puts values/ethics as the primary/center. It is BECAUSE we want Human Thriving for ourselves that metaphysics and epistemology matter - we need them to adequately understand reality such that we can work with/in it to achieve our values.

    Similarly, politics is the extension of morality to groups/larger contexts.

    Typically, aesthetics is tagged on the end - which is why it isn't part of the standing on one foot list. However, I argue that Aesthetics is about creativity/intuition/realization - far more than art and artistic expression. It is about the telos towards which we develop - the highest realization of which we are possible as human beings. And this telos is something we construct/create/imagine/envision - deeper and wider and farther and more beautiful - forever. It is limited only by our own depth as human beings, and the deeper we are, the higher we envision - which makes us deeper - but only forever.

    In this sense, Aesthetics is actually PRIOR to ethics. It is the story in which ethics works out the plot of good/bad, success/failure. It is the sense of life that sets the pinnacle of values from which we can rationally establish the hierarchy of marginal priorities. Aesthetics is the beginning and the end of ethics. Ethics is, in this sense, the tool of aesthetics in the same way that epistemology is the tool of ethics.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by ewv 9 years ago
      Aesthetics depends on a sense of life and value, which requires ethics. The emphasis on aesthetics is important -- Alan Gottlhelf's On Ayn Rand takes an interesting approach of motivation by starting with the novels -- but that isn't the logical structure of the philosophy.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo