Galt's Gulch

Climate change and the right of the people to know

Posted by coaldigger 9 years ago to Politics
7 comments | Share | Flag

Seems to me that no one is allowed to have their research published until someone edits them and tells the scientists what the conclusion is. But that's just me.
SOURCE URL: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/federal-eye/wp/2015/11/17/noaa-climate-feud-pursuit-of-scientific-truth-vs-public-accountability/

Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by DrZarkov99 9 years ago
    Obama administration spokescritters are beginning to sound like "Baghdad Bob." They tell obvious lies with straight faces, and either woodenly repeat the scripted lie over and over " . . . the satellite data is wrong . . .", or resort to indignation and ridicule of their questioners. Joe Stalin couldn't have asked for better toadies.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by broskjold22 9 years ago
    So... how can global warming "pause"? If there is a causal process between greenhouse gases and temperature increase such that an increase in greenhouse gases cause an increase in temperature, then how could the temperature averages be unaffected by the obvious increase in greenhouse gas production? Global dimming, we hear. But the industrialized world restricts particulate emissions, China excepted. So either China is causing global dimming enough to offset ALL greenhouse gases, or... maybe... its bogus?
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    -
  • Posted by freedomforall 9 years ago
    Never hear the truth from the Dark Center Post.
    Just another slanted tale from people who are afraid of truth.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
      -
    • Posted by coaldigger 9 years ago
      The problem is that this op-ed speaks the truth, which is unthinkable in the US but they are trying to make it sound rational.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        -
      • Posted by freedomforall 9 years ago
        I don't see much truth, but i see a lot of weasling around as if the people who did the research are honest. If they didn't have anything to hide, they wouldn't object. They are as bad as the so-called "leaders" in DC. They feel the people can't understand their data. If they can't explain it in a manner that it is convincing, then they shouldn't expect people to destroy the economy and way of life ... which is exactly what they are telling (not asking) people to do.
        Maybe you can explain what you mean by truth, coaldigger. I may just be missing your point.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
          -
        • Posted by coaldigger 9 years ago
          My thoughts are that the "truth" is that our leaders are manufacturing lies that fit their agenda and feeding it to us as science. They don't want the people to look at the data and the uncensored discussions on it's meaning because we might come to a conclusion they don't like. I think that we are being lead to the dissolution of the American experiment by diabolical forces that intend to enslave us. This is so obscene that we try to explain it in more palatable terms which makes us an accomplice in our own destruction.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo