How Democratic Is Your Name?

Posted by fivedollargold 11 years, 1 month ago to Politics
29 comments | Share | Flag

This is kind of creepy, but demonstrates the sort of analytics the Dems are undertaking.
SOURCE URL: http://www.claritycampaigns.com/names


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by $ MikeMarotta 11 years, 1 month ago
    Cool! thanks for the link. Very amusing. Of course, the fallacy is the collectivist identity of statistical populations with individuals. In fact, my name and my daughter's are both against the trends, hers very strongly so.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by Owlsrayne 11 years, 1 month ago
    Such analytics by someone's first name is BS. I think they should go by Last Name and Ethnic Heritage. Then you would have a better idea where they would really be in such analysis. My last name is Polish Kashub and Dutch. During the Middle Ages the Clans of Poland not only fought each other, but would band together to kick some serious butt of an external enemy. They were also got the Russians out of their country. The Dutch, troused the Spanish twice between the 1500's and 1600's. the first time is when Holland was ruled by Spain. They put together a fleet of shallow draft sailing ships with heavy cannons and systematically destroyed the dikes, bombarded Spanish Forts and Garrisons and sunk most of their large galleons. The second time when Spain tried to invade England. Unbeknownst to the English the the Dutch attacked the Spanish Fleet on the European side of the channel and sent quite a number of galleons to the bottom of the channel. So, when it comes to my heritage and what I feel about the President and Congress, If I could raise an army I would march on Washington to throw all the politicians out into the street. The other alternative is to build a fleet of gunboats and sail up the Potomack and do a cannonade on the capital. So much, for my last name and ethnic heritage on how I feel about current events.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by jimslag 11 years, 1 month ago
    Well it says my name is the third most common but it only got one thing right. I am not a Republican or Democrap (p on purpose), I don't have a degree, I don't attend religious services, however I do own a gun and know how the use it thanks to our good old Uncle Sam and his military.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by KYFHO 11 years, 1 month ago
    OK, sometimes I can really spend waaay too much time on silly stuff like this...but....I can only find the 2nd most popular name, John. Anyone figure out what is #1? And would this be considered racist if created by a conservative?
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ blarman 11 years, 1 month ago
    Amusing. I'd love to test out the "list" upload capabilities and compare a list from the deep South to a list from the East Coast to a list from an inner city neighborhood.

    What I want to know is if they are using this to target areas for voter fraud in battleground states.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by illucio 11 years, 1 month ago
    Now this is some stupid sh*t man! Isn´t prejudicism a form of discrimination? Well, this is as racist as if your name is spanish, you´re more likely to have more than one offspring and if your last name is nordic in nature, you probably will not have more than two kids. Really people, statistics are fallible, probability is not an exact science!
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Snezzy 11 years, 1 month ago
    I'm always bothered by the color identification for the two major political parties. Somehow Red is Republican while Blue must be Blemocrat.

    Didn't Red used to be Communist? Who gave it to the Republicans, anyway?
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by mccannon01 11 years, 1 month ago
      You are correct Snezzy. Red is communist. So, why the Orwellian reversal of terms in this case? Well, the socialists/communists/statists have been doing this term reversal all along to cover their stink (as in Democratic Peoples Republic of North Korea). I can't recall the article or I'd cite it here, but I read that the color reversal was actually used by a left wing "journalist" during one of our elections and it stick from there.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by 11 years, 1 month ago
        You are quite correct. The TV networks used to use red for Dems and blue for the GOP. However, the association between "Red" and "Democrat" became too embarrassing for the liberal press, so they reversed it. Not sure the year, maybe 80's.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
      • Posted by Robbie53024 11 years, 1 month ago
        From Wiki - so take it for what it is:

        The advent of color television prompted television news reporters to rely on color-coded electoral maps, though sources conflict as to the conventions they followed. One source claims that in the six elections prior to 2000 every Democrat but one had been coded red. It further claims that from 1976 to 2004, the broadcast networks, in an attempt to avoid favoritism in color-coding, standardized on the convention of alternating every four years between blue and red the color used for the incumbent party.[8][9]

        According to another source, in 1976, John Chancellor, the anchorman for NBC Nightly News, asked his network's engineers to construct a large illuminated map of the USA. The map was placed in the network's election-night news studio. If Jimmy Carter, the Democratic candidate that year, won a state, it would light up in red; if Gerald Ford, the Republican, carried a state, it would light up in blue. The feature proved to be so popular that four years later all three major television networks would use colors to designate the states won by the presidential candidates on Election Night, though not all using the same color scheme. NBC continued to use the color scheme employed in 1976 for several years. NBC newsman David Brinkley famously referred to the 1980 election map outcome as showing Ronald Reagan's 44-state landslide as resembling a "suburban swimming pool".[10]

        CBS, from 1984 on, used the opposite scheme: blue for Democrats, red for Republicans. ABC used yellow for one major party and blue for the other in 1976. However, in 1980 and 1984, ABC used red for Republicans and blue for Democrats. In 1980, when independent John B. Anderson ran a relatively high-profile campaign as an independent candidate, at least one network provisionally indicated that they would use yellow if he were to win a state. Similarly in 1992 and 1996, at least one network would have used yellow to indicate a state won by Ross Perot.

        By 1996, color schemes were relatively mixed, as CNN, CBS, ABC, and The New York Times referred to Democratic states with the color blue and Republican ones as red, while Time and The Washington Post used an opposite scheme.[11][12][13]

        In the days following the 2000 election, whose outcome was unclear for some time after election day, major media outlets began conforming to the same color scheme because the electoral map was continually in view, and conformity made for easy and instant viewer comprehension. On Election Night that year, there was no coordinated effort to code Democratic states blue and Republican states red; the association gradually emerged. Partly as a result of this eventual and near-universal color-coding, the terms "red states" and "blue states" entered popular usage in the weeks following the 2000 presidential election. After the results were final, journalists stuck with the color scheme, as The Atlantic's December 2001 cover story by David Brooks entitled, "One Nation, Slightly Divisible", illustrated.[14]

        Thus, red and blue became fixed in the media and in many people's minds, despite the fact that no "official" color choices had been made by the parties.[15] As a result, the Blue color attribution has returned to its earliest historical roots in the U.S.: as the Republicans have assumed the legacy of the old Confederacy since their takeover by the Dixiecrats in the 1970s, the Democrats have inherited the Blue of the old Union. However, Archie Tse, The New York Times graphics editor who made the choice when the Times published its first color presidential election map in 2000, provided a different rationale: "Both Republican and red start with the letter R," he said.[16]
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by CircuitGuy 11 years, 1 month ago
          It rings true, but much less interesting than the Orwellian conspiracy explanation that some people on this site apply to everything.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
          • Posted by mccannon01 11 years, 1 month ago
            Feel free to relocate to the DPRK to see for yourself if it really is a DPR.
            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
            • Posted by CircuitGuy 11 years, 1 month ago
              What does North Korea have to do with this topic?
              Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
              • Posted by mccannon01 11 years, 1 month ago
                With all due respect, CircuitGuy, but I think you missed my point, which isn't so much the country, but is to illustrate the reversal of terms used by statists as pointed out by Orwell. War is peace, peace is war. You indicated a conspiratorial premiss to my post and I offered a real world example to illustrate the point. There are many examples in our time, including naming bills brought before our legislators. Rand also illustrates this in AS.

                Yes, this thread is off topic, but red v blue was brought up and I threw in my 2 cents. Since this thread is going off topic even more, I'll leave it alone from here. You or someone else can have the last word.
                Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by CircuitGuy 11 years, 1 month ago
    It's hard to get much out of this b/c the names I tried are split almost evenly. This is why I reject statements like "the poor voted XYZ" or "engineers voted XYZ". When you look at the numbers they're usually split

    My name was 48% Democratic, but I'm registered Democrat. My wife's and kids' names are slightly Democratic.

    Both of my kids are opposed to attending UU Sunday school regularly. I'm not sure if that makes them more Democrat or Republican.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo