Short take on the October 28 Republican debate
Candidates: 10; Moderators: 0.
Not that I agree with many of the positions the candidates take, but the qotcha questions from the MSM mavens were disappointing, especially given that their day jobs is reporting on business and the economy.
Not that I agree with many of the positions the candidates take, but the qotcha questions from the MSM mavens were disappointing, especially given that their day jobs is reporting on business and the economy.
Biased lefty Demo media... what a F**ing joke!
Now, if the voters can just get out and really show their support, next year.
I won't trust this appearance, though, until I see it.
You used the term "Maven" for the questioners. I believe it's a Yiddish word that has been adopted into Americanese meaning a Smart Guy. A more appropriate word might be Schlemiel, which indicates a no-nothing loser. Those CNBC Schlemiels didn't have a debate, but a Democrat talking points festival. There are several good phrases in several languages that quite adequately describe them. I'm not dumping on you, Handyman, since "Maven" is usually used as an ironic or sarcastic word.
tions" the media people were asking.
If we think the networks are so bad (and they really are bad), can we do a better job?
If there is a chance why not try.
Makes me curious to see what candidate would refuse to accept the invite.
If you are afraid to answer real questions, or if you have no answers, then you should not be a candidate.
If you refuse an invitation to a real venue to honestly examine your positions/proposals on real issues, not divisive distractions, then your motives are suspect.
Perhaps one person can get a number of groups together to back such a debate, e.g., the Atlas Society, FEE, et al. The house speaker claims to be a Rand follower. Cruz claims to represent individual liberty. Rand Paul and his father clearly do. Would Ben Carson refuse a real discussion?
The time is ripe based on all the criticism of the debate structure by the candidates.
The networks have betrayed the trust of the public with their obvious biased agenda.
America is finished. Maybe they should have Kaitlin Jenner moderate the next debate. Ratings would go up.
Consider doing a "U-Turn" and vote one more time -this time. If we don't get someone for radical change -well then, the hell with it!