This post has been downvoted.

So, to be clear on this (no pun intended)...

Comparisons between John Galt and the Christian messiah are acceptable and worthy of discussion, but comparisons between John Galt and the Scientology paragon are not acceptable or worthy of discussion?

Did whoever downvoted even bother to follow the link to the description of a clear?

" A Clear is said to be "at cause over" (in control of) their "mental energy" (their thoughts), and able to think clearly even when faced with the very situation that in earlier times caused them difficulty. "

Is this not the ideal state for an Objectivist, to be ruled purely by clear, rational reasoned thought?