Gulch Live: Radio Interrupted 09.18.2015
Links from the show...
The Geneh War - Near Future Science Fiction with a Philosophical Flavour
http://www.galtsgulchonline.com/posts...
Net Step and Civic Sports
http://www.galtsgulchonline.com/posts...
How To Be a Rocket Scientist - or succeed like one
http://www.galtsgulchonline.com/posts...
- - - - - -
Radio Interrupted is a live show. During showtime, 1PM - 2PM ET, please participate in the real-time conversation on the Gulch Activity Feed: http://www.galtsgulchonline.com/activ...
HOW IT WORKS:
1. At 1PM ET, go to the Gulch Activity feed: http://www.galtsgulchonline.com/activ...
2. At the top, you'll see a "Gulch Live" box.
3. Type your comment, submit, and poof, your comment will be automatically injected into the stream - along with everyone else's comments as well.
NOTE
- For the best experience, post your comments in the Activity Feed. If you post your comments here, you'll not see the live stream responses and things might get a little confusing.
- When addressing someone on the feed, consider using @membername to address them directly or no one will no who you're talking to.
- All comments submitted to the feed will automatically be added to this post.
The Geneh War - Near Future Science Fiction with a Philosophical Flavour
http://www.galtsgulchonline.com/posts...
Net Step and Civic Sports
http://www.galtsgulchonline.com/posts...
How To Be a Rocket Scientist - or succeed like one
http://www.galtsgulchonline.com/posts...
- - - - - -
Radio Interrupted is a live show. During showtime, 1PM - 2PM ET, please participate in the real-time conversation on the Gulch Activity Feed: http://www.galtsgulchonline.com/activ...
HOW IT WORKS:
1. At 1PM ET, go to the Gulch Activity feed: http://www.galtsgulchonline.com/activ...
2. At the top, you'll see a "Gulch Live" box.
3. Type your comment, submit, and poof, your comment will be automatically injected into the stream - along with everyone else's comments as well.
NOTE
- For the best experience, post your comments in the Activity Feed. If you post your comments here, you'll not see the live stream responses and things might get a little confusing.
- When addressing someone on the feed, consider using @membername to address them directly or no one will no who you're talking to.
- All comments submitted to the feed will automatically be added to this post.
By saying serve your country instead of constitution or even citizens it leads the way to misuse. In this day and age I don't serve a country with a government that dumped the constitution for the patriot act. That would be breaking my oath of office.
But thanks for thanking me for serving the Constitution and the people. I knew what you meant. At least I hope you knew what you meant.
You are correct about the semantics and definitions. In my prior statement, what I meant was that nations have values that are supposed to the embodiments of the thought/values of their individuals. While my country may just be dirt, it is MY dirt. I have earned it, and I will defend it.
The post was me agreeing with jbrenner, extending his example of the Constitution to include just laws and respect for private property.
§ 2-1 THE SOURCE OF THE FEDERAL POWER
Throughout the history of the United States the Supreme Court has upheld all manner of federal statutes regulating immigration. By contrast, Supreme Court decisions preclude states from passing legislation that directly impinges on this area of federal dominion. The Supreme Court’s basis for action is clear when the area regulated is naturalization. Article 1, § 8, clause 4, of the United States Constitution specifically grants Congress the power to establish a "uniform Rule of Naturalization." By expressly allocating this power to Congress, the Constitution prevents the confusion that would result if individual states could bestow citizenship. The Constitution does not, however, explicitly provide that the power to deny admission or remove non-citizens rests with the federal government as opposed to state governments. Hence, in the early immigration cases the Supreme Court faced the problem of identifying the source of the federal government's exclusive and plenary power over immigration. Later cases found the plenary power to be an inherent sovereign power."
So there are no 9th and 10th Amendment issues.
There are several others pertaining 14th Amendment is one of them.
As for my own opinion the answer is no. It there is No. That means the most heinous criminals could be automatically allowed in?
What am I saying they are including a five times serial killer.
I would expect it to be enforced by more than a slap on the wrist and temporary deportation.
As for regulating the amount yes, giving preference to those with job skills we need yes, but regulating and having different standards for each country or ethnic group no that's where it crosses the line from the practical to the impractical. as for your last sentence Subjectivists could never have founded a country anywhere. The mindset is saying is the same a doing and that doesn't grow carrots for the stewpot.
A useful blend as we learned in high school Civics however usually will carry the day in any effort.
Because, I'd like to hear that argument.
The use of it as a biological weapon excluding unintentional use by migration
is at least 2500 years old and not uncommon. Many sources here is the Baylor University link.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/artic...
There is no argument it's a done deal Eudaimonia wins
Endeavor to Perservere and when the day is over and the kids tucked in their beds. Give 'em a hug, grab a mug and pour yourself a ...Tecate, Dos XXs, Pacifico!
Unalienable not Inalienable.
I was happily successful in hooking up to Radio Free North America in now to go find a headset with a speaker and see if that works though I think I will speak only when spoken too. Objectively speaking with some subjective hopes.
Would you agree to any constitution that limited immigration were you a founder?
Neither looks at these people as human beings, but rather as means to their political ends.
One thing is there is a living mechanism in the document. It's called procedures for amendment. It's not called 'ignore it.'
To Xthinker88 there is not need to sneak across the border to Mexico. it's an open border. Just jump on the bus and sometimes you aren't even asked to buy a visa.
In Re race, Biologically you are correct, 1 race, socially is where the artificial construct of race comes into play. And since it is invalid biologically, it is an artificial construct at base.
Therefore I switched to Terra until some decides the ending in the Spanish Dictionary denotes feminine gender.
Gaiaan? No. Same complaint.
How about instead of deciding what label to use don't call anyone anything. not even something or nothing. That oughta keep everyone happy.
Loco! Que Patina in su Coco!
Just pulling your leg Techx
You can choose to take this government at its word.
I choose not to.
I'm arguing that under ideal circumstances they have a right to come but not so long as I'm paying for the goodies in the galleys and that we should fix the sinking ship first. It's even worse because the "goodies in the galley" are what are sinking the ship. (although that couldn't happen in a real nautical scenario I think)
Load more comments...