Can Atlas Shrugged/Galt's Gulch ever become a hit series?
Could Atlas Shrugged ever be the basis for a TV series? Can storylines be written that would educate and still entertain? The series House of Cards is a big hit for NetFlix. Would the AS series be better off with a continuing storyline or short segments? Would John and Joan Aglialoro be interested in continuing to promote the Ayn Rand book?
Would the public be interested a series about Galt's Gulch and getting there? Does Atlas Shrugged have more to say than just three 2 hour movies?
There are many outlets searching for new and interesting content. Is anyone interested in making it happen? Set up a group to make a framework?
Would the public be interested a series about Galt's Gulch and getting there? Does Atlas Shrugged have more to say than just three 2 hour movies?
There are many outlets searching for new and interesting content. Is anyone interested in making it happen? Set up a group to make a framework?
Then to see if there are writers in the gulch that would like to participate putting together Season 1
I know nothing about writing TV and movies, but I would certainly watch such a series.
But, $ Maphesdus Posted:
Get a group of individuals together? Careful, you're starting to sound like a collectivist... ;)
With my reply: How can a series be made without a group working together. How can Taggart get new rails without Rearden Steel? How is a movie made without a large group?
and Maphesdus Posted Reply:
They can't. That's my point.
While continuity is generally better, different actors portraying roles is not unheard of.
Though to be honest, I personally don't think Atlas Shrugged would really have worked very well as a TV series. While there are some certain scenes and arcs which I would have liked to see in the movie (specifically, the childhood romance between Dagny and Francisco), the story is one that's built for a novel. Stretching it out into a TV series would just make the plot drag, especially if nothing was cut out. I think the audio book version is about 60 hours long, which would be either 60 full-hour episodes, or 120 half-hour episodes. When you consider that one season of a show is usually only ten or so episodes long, filming that much story would be a massive project, one which could potentially span anywhere from 6 to 12 years, and could potentially get cancelled halfway through if it didn't get good ratings (which is a high probability, considering the box office sales of the movies). Now they could certainly condense the entire story down into one season consisting of ten one-hour episodes, which would give them four more hours in which to tell the story versus what they had in the movies, but they'd still have to cut out a lot, and they'd also have to be willing to end the series after only season because there isn't anything else after it ends.
Now if they wanted to make the plot of the TV series into a sequel to the novel, rather than an adaptation of it, then they'd have a lot more freedom to craft a unique story that was specifically written with TV in mind, and thus circumvent many of the challenges associated with adapting an existing work. But this presents its own unique problem of potentially straying from the spirit of the original story, as Ayn Rand is no longer around to provide new content or ensure that the new plot is consistent with her philosophy. Ultimately, while adapting Atlas Shrugged into a TV series is a fun idea to think about, I don't think it would be at all practical.
However, if the TV series was a totally new story with a new setting and new characters, and didn't try to be Atlas Shrugged, but rather simply promoted Objectivist values, that might be much more feasible. Though at the same time, such a story wouldn't be Ayn Rand's Objectivism, but rather a new derivative of Objectivism as understood by whoever wrote the script. But that's okay. Everyone has a unique view on life, and it would be interesting to see the same philosophical construct which Ayn Rand created being projected through another person's value system.
That said, I don't think it could work either commercially nor structurally. Episodes need to be self-contained, so that there is a premise, action, and resolution. They would also need to carry a theme that advances the story line but without alienating the audience should they miss an episode or two. That was why I always found 24 so frustrating during the TV presentation. I might miss an episode or two and when I got back, would be totally lost. When I could get the DVD's and watch in sequence, it was much more enjoyable.
The other thing is commercial success. A show needs eyeballs and eyeballs need a compelling reason to watch. Who wants to watch the depressing dystopia of the world of AS? If that's what I want to see, I can just turn on FoxNews.
So, no, I don't think this could ever be a commercially successful episodic TV series. Perhaps mini-series.
24 had many eyeballs and now you can watch a continuing story on Netflix without the problem of missing an episode, ie House of Cards. Also, on demand and DVR. Times have changed,
I'm thinking of something along the lines of the re-imagined BSG. It didn't try to be BSG even though it was about the exact same thing.
I see what Netflix original has done with House of Cards, lilyhammer and others. In the past it was very difficult to come from the outside and have the mainstream networks accept the series, especially if they disagreed with the principles.,
Getting a episode storyboard may be the best place to start laying out an outline. We would need a chatroom to discuss ideas and themes.
Also to discuss your suggestion of a objectivist based series.