Eisenhower's Wisdom
Posted by rustylypps 10 years, 10 months ago to History
Fifty-two years ago today, President Dwight Eisenhower gave his farewell speech and warned about “the acquisition
of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex.” He said, “The potential
for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist.
“We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes,” he said. “We
should take nothing for granted. Only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the
huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals, so that security and liberty
may prosper together.”
Eisenhower was prescient on this subject. But in the speech he warned of much more.
He warned that the technological revolution, which was just beginning, would become formalized and complex,
would come under the direction of the Federal government and would be dominated by the “scientific technological elite.”
“The prospect of domination of the nation’s scholars by Federal employment, project allocations, and the power of money
is ever present and is gravely to be regarded,” he said. “Yet, in holding scientific research and discovery in respect, as we
should, we must also be alert to the equal and opposite danger that public policy could itself become the captive of a
scientific technological elite.”
It’s obvious Eisenhower’s warnings were not heeded. Our foreign policy is now captive to the military-industrial complex.
No longer, as it was “throughout America’s adventure in free government” up to Eisenhower’s time, are “our basic purposes …
to keep the peace; to foster progress in human achievement, and to enhance liberty, dignity and integrity among people and
among nations.” Our leaders have failed in that regard, and that failure has led to perpetual war.
Meanwhile, the “scientific technological elite” he warned about has taken over domestic energy policy. President Barack
Obama is sinking untold billions of dollars into driving us into inefficient and unworkable “green industries” under the false
notion of anthropomorphic global warming.
of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex.” He said, “The potential
for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist.
“We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes,” he said. “We
should take nothing for granted. Only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the
huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals, so that security and liberty
may prosper together.”
Eisenhower was prescient on this subject. But in the speech he warned of much more.
He warned that the technological revolution, which was just beginning, would become formalized and complex,
would come under the direction of the Federal government and would be dominated by the “scientific technological elite.”
“The prospect of domination of the nation’s scholars by Federal employment, project allocations, and the power of money
is ever present and is gravely to be regarded,” he said. “Yet, in holding scientific research and discovery in respect, as we
should, we must also be alert to the equal and opposite danger that public policy could itself become the captive of a
scientific technological elite.”
It’s obvious Eisenhower’s warnings were not heeded. Our foreign policy is now captive to the military-industrial complex.
No longer, as it was “throughout America’s adventure in free government” up to Eisenhower’s time, are “our basic purposes …
to keep the peace; to foster progress in human achievement, and to enhance liberty, dignity and integrity among people and
among nations.” Our leaders have failed in that regard, and that failure has led to perpetual war.
Meanwhile, the “scientific technological elite” he warned about has taken over domestic energy policy. President Barack
Obama is sinking untold billions of dollars into driving us into inefficient and unworkable “green industries” under the false
notion of anthropomorphic global warming.
Can't agree with this statement. The MIC does attempt to control as much as it can, under this president, it doesn't influence Foreign Policy. If it did we would not be in appeasement mode all around the world. We would have a more bellicose tone towards Iran and perhaps even China.
But at the time, he had Nixon, LBJ, and their like to deal with. You'll note that he didn't talk like this speech during his Presidency, non until his departure. I think that's more telling than anything else.
If you think about it, from when he left office until 1989-that's a long war to win. But once Russia toppled we did not finish it. We let the war die. Yet-we never reduced the military build-up. We continued the largess. Now we have a vast military industrial complex that can be used against the people. Our greatest threats are internal.