My notes on Atlus Shrugged

Posted by Shree-Agnihotri 11 years, 6 months ago to The Gulch: Introductions
4 comments | Share | Flag

No, this is not all I think of Atlus Shrugged, it is as you can see incomplete. It is in no way the sum of all I have to say on The subject. But its a start. And what I think about The subject is my introduction.
SOURCE URL: http://bookijustread.blogspot.in/2013/05/atlas-shrugged-by-ayn-rand.html


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by Lucky 11 years, 6 months ago
    Welcome. A very good thoughtful introduction.
    There is an easy mistake to make when summarizing Rand- to say that money (financial selfishness) is everything. But in Atlas Shrugged we have the strong example of Dagny who would not steal and recoiled at taking the business from a rival when the government/industry cartel destroyed his company, and Hank Rearden who would not sell his business even at the unstated but high price government offered. Recall D'Anconia's powerful speech- it is not the amount of money a man has that defines him, it is how he earned it.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by khalling 11 years, 6 months ago
    Welcome, and thanks for posting. First, I want to say, keep reading the book and maybe you will feel inclined to re-check some of your premises.
    "When “the common good” of a society is regarded as something apart from and superior to the individual good of its members, it means that the good of some men takes precedence over the good of others, with those others consigned to the status of sacrificial animals. It is tacitly assumed, in such cases, that “the common good” means “the good of the majority” as against the minority or the individual. Observe the significant fact that that assumption is tacit: even the most collectivized mentalities seem to sense the impossibility of justifying it morally. But “the good of the majority,” too, is only a pretense and a delusion: since, in fact, the violation of an individual’s rights means the abrogation of all rights, it delivers the helpless majority into the power of any gang that proclaims itself to be “the voice of society” and proceeds to rule by means of physical force, until deposed by another gang employing the same means" AR, Capitalism The Unknown Ideal
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo