NRA sues over Seattle's adoption of 'gun violence tax'
From the article: "Three gun rights groups, including the National Rifle Association, sued the city of Seattle on Monday over its adoption of a so-called 'gun violence tax,' a tax on firearms and ammunition designed to help offset the financial toll of gun violence."
We need to seriously consider a "Darwin Award" category.
We need to seriously consider a "Darwin Award" category.
When there's a drunk-driving accident, we blame the DRIVER.
WHY, when there's a shooting do we blame the GUN?
Starbucks on every corner. . I haven't had a cup of coffee since
1994 and just can't get it. -- j
.
a mix of flat sprite and v8 pomegranate/blueberry. . it's goooooood,
when cold with reverse-osmosis ice!!! -- j
.
Only it's worse than that -- because it may very well increase the problem it purports to solve, by deterring some law-abiding people from buying guns.
One is tempted to evade the tax by buying outside the city and/or on the black market.
I suspect we already do, through our own auto insurance policies and a lot of other things...
But you're trying to bring logic to an emotion-plagued 'debate.'
Guns are scary. They combine the elements of Surprise and Distance for the user, whether the 'user' is a hunter or a deranged killer.
Virtually all weapons' development since the fist was discovered were 'improvements' to add surprise and distance... rock, sling, slingshot, bow and arrow, crossbow, rifle, six-shooter, semi-automatic weapons and so on. The peak of that 'pyramid' or 'end of that road' is probably nuclear weapons delivered by ICBM.
And nobody ever tries to solve the problem of 'how can you stop a PERSON from USING a gun to kill someone? Thwarting availability doesn't work, but gun-control advocates never stop beating that drum.
Which is 'worth more'... the Sometimes or the "Works"? I'm reading the Freakonomics Series... I recommend it to all!
No way is this going to affect the criminal element that should be the target of this action... but since it's "too hard" to go after the cause of the problem, let's instead go after those who are not part of the problem.
I wonder if Seattle's dotgov could Darwin itself. Tail wagging the dog mentality. And I thought California was bad...
But then I look at how it affects me and say, I don't care how stupid these people are, their decisions are going to affect me so I should support the efforts to beat them upside the head with a lawsuit.
electronic cigarette anxiety and funhouse mirror shock as well.
might we also consider terrorist tax on gasoline from Venezuela? -- j
It interesting how the NRA is suing on this but didn't put in much effort on the state passing a law that you can not touch another persons weapon without a background check and a legal transfer. Seattle likes it too when Bill Gates and Mayor Bloomberg get their dollars behind passing laws here that the majority of the people don't want or don't care about.
Mark my words, if Seattle keeps going this direction with the mayors and City Council people they continue to elect, it will end up like the outskirts of Detroit. It's already pulling in a lot of freaks, like San Francisco and other cities that are going away from family values (human values) that we used to know. It can not get better until we have better leaders, the normal people don't[ have a chance anymore without police and government backing. Currently it seems government is against us, this government of, for, and by, the people? What happened to that?
Jan
Next it will be a vehicle license tax to offset the financial toll of vehicle accidents.
Why dont they just have a "breathing tax", designed to offset the cost of hiring government workers performing useless and unnecessary tasks.
Maybe they should just take all the money we make and then distribute out living pittances to people based on how little they can live on.
If they like what you are for you get tax exempt status from the IRS.
If they don't like what you are for, you not only don't get tax exempt status, you get audited instead.
I agree this gun tax is partly by tax-what-you-personally-don't-like. But the rationalization behind it is actually worse. It's insidious. It's the idea that there should be no cost for freedom. I hear people upset that protesters cause normal wear-and-tear on the Capitol and the Square. That wear-and-tear is just a cost of freedom. I'm not sure I believe guns cause a net cost on society, but even if they did, I would not be for penalizing gun owners. You just have to accept some things as part of freedom. No one said freedom is the cheapest course of action. Freedom isn't free.