Trump's Record: and Why Are People Throwing Reason Out the Door For Populist Thinking?
For Nancy Pelosi
For Eminent Domain-Praised the Kelo Decision
For Single Payer HEalthcare
4 Bankruptcies, 3 marriages
For Gun Control
For Eminent Domain-Praised the Kelo Decision
For Single Payer HEalthcare
4 Bankruptcies, 3 marriages
For Gun Control
Previous comments...
For Eminent Domain-Praised the Kelo Decision, he may have praised it, but I cannot find anyplace he actually USED it.
For Single Payer HEalthcare, according to Trump back in the 1990's he said that would have been the time, but has said years ago since then, that not today,, and indicated the problem is the invisible state lines and no free market competition.
4 Bankruptcies, 3 marriages, 4 Chapter 11's, and there is nothing illegal about that...and you you complain about that then you better complaint at anyone filing bankruptcy for any reason then. 3 marriages. and your point 50% of ALL marriages fail...and let's face it...there are tens of millions of people who have more than 3 marriages,..how does that make you a bad person?
For Gun Control ; Not really...have you watched his interviews? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NSmbY... This was from over a year ago...
The fact that he praised Kelo vs New London is enough for me. It would of course be way worse if he personally had benefited from the decision, but his agreement with the decision is a strike in my book.
Four bankruptcies, 3 marriages, etc... No, there's nothing illegal at all about it. But it is very revealing about his morals. I can deal with one bankruptcy, but four takes it to where he's actually comfortable with the process. And if one reads about the details of the process and all those who were left high and dry in the process, one comes out with a very bad taste in the mouth. It doesn't necessarily make him a bad person, but it sure allows one to question his motives. This one is a strike in my book.
I don't really buy the gun control support thing either, as he's done interviews with the NRA and he and his sons are avid hunters. It isn't to say that he has never uttered a word endorsing magazine capacity limits, etc., because he has. But I'm looking at the "body of work" and I'm just seeing more to support gun rights than to oppose them. Is he perfect or ideal? No. But I don't see enough to give him a strike here.
Verdict: two strikes, one ball, one no-call. Far from the ideal candidate, but not going to rule him out completely.
http://www.nationalreview.com/article...
You want to trust a guy to run the entire country who has 4 bankruptcies in his business?
What are you thinking?
Just playing a role in the script of the street theater product of BOHWCA! So we have a left wing extremist an left wing socialist statist from the left wing of the left. Now which two RINOs will get the nod from Government Party HQ?
With four candidates for two slots they can hardly lose.But they their offerings or should I say leavings could get worse.
Plus he's willing and able to bring up the issues the career politicians have huge incentives not to - many of which a Gulch dweller would love to see brought up for debate.