Global Warming????????????????

Posted by BlueNova 11 years, 6 months ago to Government
27 comments | Share | Best of... | Flag

The release of carbon to the atmosphere by man amounts to 0.3% of greenhouse gases. The total amount of all carbon is 5% of GH gases. Water vapor amounts to 95% of GH gases. Man does NOT cause global warming, only nature causes GW. Nature also causes global cooling.

In fact, no one under the age of 16 yrs old has experienced GW. It's been cooling. But the irrational left explains that away by blaming the cooling on global warming. You just can't win with these irrational progessives.

As most know in Galt's Gulch, it's all about power and take over of the economy and, hence, the government. If it isn't global warming; it's ice ages; it the ozone hole; it's the population bomb; it's the missle gap, etc.

The dems are not "the party of the people;" they're "the party of people that thinks people are stupid." And according to the election of obama and his ilk, they're unfortunately right.


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by Ben_C 11 years, 6 months ago
    If anyone is interested I will post my Dad's research on GW. I asked him a few years ago to write a paper on the subject in response to Senator Levin's (D - for dummy) position that GW is a settled science. Right. The referenced paper supports all those who know that GW is hogwash. Dad is a nuclear physicist with a PhD and two Master's degrees and way smarter than me.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by Grendol 11 years, 6 months ago
    Whether there truly is an environmental concern in lots of cases has become secondary too often to the agenda of the collectivists who gravitate to the regulatory agencies. What I mean is, environmental concerns are used as a pretext for government to take property rights to itself. This is the goal of collectivists who want the government to control the economy, and what more subtle way to do that than to regulate for the sake of the "Environment". Even the word "Environment" in their language is a pronoun name, not a regular noun anymore. Such changes in vocabulary allow the mindset to shift from protection of resources, to the demonization of those who seek to utilize resources shifting perception of them from being good producers to being evil antagonists of this innocent being the "Environment" whom they are assaulting with their Corporate Greed. Beware of bodies (Agencies, societies, councils etc) who's sole purpose is to "protect" something other than a citizen's rights. When such groups form, they never solve a problem that puts them out of a job, which is ultimately what such groups should do. Instead they gain power through the perpetration of the belief that the problem is greater than it is somehow to gain power and extend their existence beyond it's useful purpose.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by 11 years, 5 months ago
      Better late than never. 1) Ice Ages; 2) Global Warming (aka-Climate Changes); 3) Missle Gap-Yah; 4) Population Bomb-Oh, those pesky humans; 5) I heard some report of the current cooling may cause an ice age-LOL: 6) Global cooling is caused by global warming-How can you argue with that w/o shooting yourself?; and, 7) The goverment spying on you- Wait, that's true.

      I drag race and zoomed in on the 1/4 mile track to see the weather and judge if I should go. I could see a snap shot of two cars racing. If we can do that; what can THEY do?
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ rockymountainpirate 11 years, 6 months ago
    I watched the season premier of Deadliest Catch. They were all complaining about the ice being the worst in decades. Many boats suffered a lot of damage and some missed the next season because of it.

    Man has to be the villain so that he can be controlled. Every notice that the greenies drive and fly to their protests?
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by 11 years, 6 months ago
      As far as ice, it comes and goes like any weather cycle. During or near the time of the American Revolution there was the Minor Ice Age. We, in the course of the history of earth, are but a grain of sand in the Sahara Desert.

      An acquaintance said to me and I agree, "How arrogant can man be to think that he can affect the weather."

      Your right, it's all about the government controlling us. It's people that can't think for themselves that help further their agenda.
      They're the ones who drive and don't walk. It's for the other people to conserve, not them.

      If cap and trade is pushed through by bho bypassing the congress, we're screwed. How could anyone vote for a candidate (during the first campaign) that on video said that under his policies electric rates will naturally skyrocket.

      BTW, I've only convinced one unrelated person in MA that GW isn't caused by man but by nature. He started to talk about the curve he saw (i.e., the infamous hockey stick curve) and I told him that the earth's temperature has been cooling. Then I told him my occupation and he became a covert, at least during our discussion.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by $ rockymountainpirate 11 years, 6 months ago
        My point exactly. There are cycles. Always have been, always will be. The dinos had more oxygen. I'm sure their farts were far more powerful than a modern cow. There have been major extinctions too, and man wasn't around to cause them.

        You have me curious. What is your occupation?
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by 11 years, 6 months ago
          I'm an environment engineer. I signed the "Concern Scientist" petition some years ago (circa 2003) that listed 32,000 scientist. While I'm not strictly speaking a scientist but, as I was told, I'm from an educational background that's grounded in scientific thought. Anyway, I think for myself.

          Speaking of farts, as you know, cows contribute to GH gases way, way more than man does. The little devils just about created the ozone hole Hey, whatever happen to the ozone hole?
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
          • Posted by khalling 11 years, 6 months ago
            oh- that was the vegans. they had to give it up because people liked meat so much, everyone quit paying attention. Imagine you're a vegan environmentalist. you're walking around mad at the whole human race. If you're a vegan environmentalist gun owner, you should be on a short list somewhere
            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
            • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
            • Posted by M-Dizzle 11 years, 6 months ago
              what about a vegan who just does it cuz they think they will benefit and doesn't hate the rest of us? Most vegans I know can be a little chatty/preachy about it but are mainly just trying to be healthier.
              Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ sjatkins 11 years, 4 months ago
    The % of green house gas from human CO2 production is actually much smaller than you state. But he point is well taken. The predictions of the GW models grossly overshot actual average temperatures in the last decade. Obviously the models are seriously flawed. None to my knowledge account well for the natural fluctuations in average global temperatures.
    People have been stampeded into a mass hysteria on purpose. Scientists are threatened with loss of reputation, of tenure, of grants if they speak against AGW.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo