Does that make Obama the Moscow Candidate or the Manchurian Candidate?

Just a small reminder. Putin was the head of the former KGB. There is still a KGB even though they have changed its name. Putin is responsible for almost as many deaths as Stalin, and certainly more than any predecessor. Obama, if he were a true patriot, would never enter into discussions with Putin, or the Iranian Mullahs or any evil beasts who are the very antithesis of America. It makes him an aider and abettor as far as I'm concerned.

WE should be spending on DEFENSE to keep the Russians from successfully attacking us (StarWars?). In the past, the best defense was to let them know that if they fired off missles we could defend but they could not because they didnt have star wars. Result: destruction of Russia and no destruction of the USA. I think that still works and we should finish star wars defense. We should also calmly stop enabling Russia. We need to strengthen our currency so others WANT to use it as a reserve currency, and cut the Russians out of SWIFT. (while we can). A weaker Russia is a better Russia. Their culture is pretty aggressive and BAD.

Osama's policies are very easy to understand and forsee. His goal is economic and social destruction of the US. Every one of his policies has been a step towards that goal. I can think of not a single exception. On any topic, pick the option that will cause the the most damage and option has been or will be Osama's policy.

0 is a uneducated individual from the ghetto. He does have a ghetto personality if you hadn't noticed. He just spends money like a drunken sailor. What separates him from the welfare recipient in the ghetto? NOTHING. Saying his name in the same sentence as R. Reagan is an insult to Reagan.

Communism, Socialism, Nazism, Racism, Environmentalism, Religions etc are nothing more than different hats created by the powers that be to help herd all the sheeple. If the organization is tax exempt it has to follow their guidelines, and laws.
I would be surprised if Obama wasn't trying that tactic.

It just occurred to me...perhaps the last two letters of your title should be capitalized?

Another Soviet strategy that we can know with certainty that Obama and the Democrat-Socialist Party are using against us is "Two Steps Forward, One Step Back." That's been the case for years, but particularly now; to a degree the NWO RINOs have been using it against us too.

Pick your poison: Obamacare declares each of our physical bodies to be the de facto property of government, and the best we get (from the RINO herd,) is "Repeal and Replace";

The Dodd / Frank / Greenspan / Bush / Bernanke / Obama mortgage meltdown and bailout had us reeling under Bush's $780B pulled out of thin air, with the "one step back" being a loudly-heralded "spending reduction" from the Boehner types that amounted to something like $300M, a drop in the bucket in context;

Iran is not just being allowed to develop nuclear weapons, but seemingly urged to by the Obama Administration - but now we've got some impressive naval firepower bravely defending Yemen from the Iranian navy, presumably to shore up the idea that BTO (Barack Taqqiya Obama) rilly-rilly means business on defense issues fer sure.

Examples abound, though most of them are more like "marathons forward" rather than a mere two steps.

I say it's time to embrace that game ourselves - and demand it of our elected "representation." By which I mean it's time to pull as radically in "our" direction as they have been pulling in the direction of collectivist totalitarianism.

- We've seen the groundwork being laid for the UN's "Agenda 21" plan - which is basically worldwide neo-serfdom under the "green" banners, Climategate or no Climategate. It's happening in many ways, from "smart" meters to light bulbs fitted with Wi-Fi and cameras to tele-screens to "smart growth" (which is neither,) to further regimentation of automotive engineering and ever-more-suffocating restrictions on driving per se. On land grabs, Obama is up to something like fifteen in his gargantuan land- and ocean- grabs as "National Monuments" and "Wilderness Areas" and "We Had To Call This Something Other Than Neo-Medievalism" etc. - the long-term goal of which for this century is the systematic obliteration of land ownership in total among us plebes. Which in turn means a lurch back to Medieval feudalism, in which a small clutch of nobles owns the land and the serfs exist by permission.

We can short-circuit this with two actions, one an easy sell and the other more difficult (keeping in mind that I'm neither an attorney nor expert on Constitutional Law):

1. A new Constitutional Amendment that would abolish, nationwide, all property taxation. Finis. Done. Ex-parrot.

Malta, Lichtenstein, Croatia, Thailand, Monaco, Fiji, the Cook Islands, New Zealand, Israel, Dubai, Bahrain are just a few of the countries where there is no residential property taxation at all, or at most a one-time tax on purchase or sale of a residence. The United States of America, once the leader of the free world, has a less-just tax policy than Croatia? Than Malta? Than Dubai? We must abolish the barbaric anachronism of property taxation entirely, as a new human rights paradigm for the entire world. Given the fact that every American has to have a roof over his head, either owned or rented (renters would benefit from the landlord's lower costs,) this ought to be an easy sell and easy ratification.

2. Demand a complete selloff, to individual American citizens, of all government-held land not located directly beneath legitimate government buildings and military bases - whether at auction, via a new Homestead Act or some other mechanism is immaterial, so long as it's done, and aggressively implemented. The proceeds can be used to apply to the national debt. The CATO Institute did a paper on the subject in 1999 titled "How and Why to Privatize Federal Lands":
http://www.cato.org/pubs/pas/pa363.pdf
I hit upon the idea before becoming aware of that piece, but it's an idea whose time has come.

- We all know about Obamacare, and despite the fact that it's been whittled down significantly, even with a Republican Administration taking office in January 2017 the best proposal we're hearing is "Repeal and Replace." We should be arguing for a complete Separation of Medicine and State, using Peikoff's simple question as a springboard for debate: "Why was it possible for a person of modest means to get good health care prior to the mid-'60s without courting bankruptcy, but isn't now? What happened in the mid-'60s?"

- Communist Core is on the ropes but still in force; when asked what to replace it with, Republicans typically glance around nervously and ask about the weather. As above, we must push for a complete Separation of Education and State. Homeschooling, small parent-run neighborhood schools for those with neither expertise nor time to homeschool directly, and complete deregulation of for-profit school businesses and all private schools - these should be the Republican alternative.

Etc.
.

Cloward Piven strategy: Overload the system until it collapses in order to remake their idealized society from the ashes. Millions of casualties are acceptable to reach their goal.

I've said it here before.
I'm sure I'll say it more.
Cloward and Piven--
It's a given.
The One made an adaptation
To a modern situation.

I see your point, and can't disagree. The deficits certainly are not being used to build up defense and defeat anybody. (True we lob a few drones here and there, give some marginal help in the Middle East, but this is no Star Wars spending). For the most part the spending is being totally wasted in failed domestic programs, like "jobs programs" that somehow fail to produce any jobs, increased welfare, and who knows what percentage going to corruption and cronies (e.g. "green" energy magnates, Solyndra), etc. etc. And they are indeed destroying our economy.

If you couple this with his Anti-Industrial regulatory policies. e.g., his very personal "War on Coal", his one-man refusal to approve the XL pipeline after his own State Department studies have shown it to be "safe" several times, and both Houses of Congress, in a bi-partisan vote, have also approved it, and I'm sure many more to list, I have to conclude that his was and is serious in his attempt to "fundamentally change America", in particular whatever is left of its Capitalist economy.

Trust me, as a veteran...we are scared!
The VA is slower than the second coming of Jesus.
If they don't care for veterans, the average citizen does not have an ice cubes chance in Hades, on anything...not that we ever did. Of course ANYTHING done by the Government is "For the Pubic Good"

And the Comments! The Comments!

That's exactly what Alinsky advises. The ruin Obama is bringing to our country (including the pending race/class war) is not an accident.

My suspicion is the "strategy" of borrowing (in the 80s and now) is more rationalization than strategy. It's easy to spend now at the price of slightly higher costs of debt servicing years from now. This is why many families and individuals are in bad financial shape and ignore it until some mini-crisis hits. The gov't is representing the people in this and taking the same approach. We'll find the political will to stop the borrowing once the inevitable mini-crisis happens.