Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by ObjectiveAnalyst 11 years ago
    Update: The latest report is that the driver claims to have been drowsy, perhaps falling asleep at the wheel ,so to speak... I think this could be easily avoidable with either a co-engineer/driver or technology. If ever there was a mode of transportation that was well suited for automation, trains being fixed to a track are ideal. Sensors on the track could easily impart critical info like speed limits to a train passing over them, and the train could easily respond automatically. Something this obvious, screams out, where are the infrastructure dollars being wasted that should long ago have been applied here? For that matter why aren't the Railroads doing this on their own? Why would public money be needed at all? I would call this negligence and the Railroads should see it is in their interest to do something about this and avoid more of what will surely be an abundance of lawsuits.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by ObjectiveAnalyst 11 years ago
    Terrible tragedy. From what I heard this morning they are suggesting the driver/engineer? was possibly distracted by a handheld device probably a cell phone...
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
    • Posted by Boborobdos 11 years ago
      Or undiagnosed sleep apnea, type two diabetes, or a bad reaction to his recent shift change.

      I do agree that more automation and a second engineer would help, but the term "featherbedding" came out of RR labor negotiations.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by ObjectiveAnalyst 11 years ago
        Wow, Boborobdos, I believe we agree. Apparently they weren't practicing "Featherbedding" this time around...
        I am sorry I can't agree with your position on healthcare, although I must admit you made a lot waves yesterday. Also I am less inclined to argue against what is done in Vermont, since I am an advocate for Federalism.
        Respectfully,
        O.A.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
        • Posted by Boborobdos 11 years ago
          An advocate for Federalism? That's gotta ruffle some feathers around here where I suspect states' rights would be at the top of the list. It appears that the closer decisions are to the individual the happier they are.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
          • Posted by ObjectiveAnalyst 11 years ago
            Well, yes it probably does from time to time, but the constitution allows states to do things not enumerated, while the document clearly with the 9th and 10th amendments deny the federal government the power to institute much of what it has done. The document is a limit on the federal government and a guarantee of all residual freedoms and liberties to the states and people. I reject any other interpretation. If a state wishes to experiment with socialism, I can still vote with my feet.
            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo