Today's cartoon | Personal Liberty

Posted by rockymountainpirate 10 years ago to Entertainment

62 comments | Share | Flag

Neither for me thank you very much.

SOURCE URL: http://personalliberty.com/todays-cartoon-69/

Add Comment

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

10

Posted by teri-amborn 10 years ago

They might as well run on the same ticket.

Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink
- 8
  
  Posted by Old4WDGuy 10 years ago
  
  They are two faces of the same uniparty now. I remember when there was an actual difference. I miss the 80s.
  
  Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink
- 7
  
  Posted by rockymountainpirate 10 years ago
  
  +1 for truth. What is the choice when there is no choice.
  
  Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink
- 3
  
  Posted by edweaver 10 years ago
  
  So true!
  
  Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink

10

Posted by jbrenner 10 years ago

If we have a Clinton vs. Bush election again, then we might as well have a monarchy. Ackkk!

Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink
- 10
  
  Posted by rockymountainpirate 10 years ago
  
  When will the people say enough?
  
  Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink
  - 7
    
    Posted by jbrenner 10 years ago
    
    Some of us have said, "Enough", but we are not loud enough or numerous enough. Who is John Galt?
    
    Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink
    - 9
      
      Posted by rockymountainpirate 10 years ago
      
      Agreed. I swear by my life and my love of it......
      
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink
      - 3
        
        Posted by khalling 10 years ago
        
        unfortunately, he is trending highly in the polls right now. I went to GOP.com and took a straw poll. They do make you sign up, I gave them my name but a dummy email acct I never use. I was surprised at some of the choices, pleasantly, that is.
        
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink
        
        Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
        
        4
        
        Posted by Robbie53024 10 years ago
        
        I hope you were positively impressed with Scott Walker.
        
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink
        
        -
        
        4
        
        Posted by khalling 10 years ago
        
        you can pick three candidates. I picked Rand Paul, Scott Walker, and Ted Cruz. I wavered on Bobby Jindal...
        
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink
        
        -
        
        3
        
        Posted by robertmbeard 10 years ago
        
        I like your 3 picks, as well. I typically prefer someone who has been a governor, since the president is the CEO of the federal government; so, executive experience should be required. However, based on their closer adherence to the US Constitution, I like Senators Paul and Cruz. Perhaps a Walker-Paul ticket would be a winner...?
        
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink
        
        Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
        
        4
        
        Posted by Robbie53024 10 years ago
        
        Not all Gov's are the same - to whit: Jerry Brown, Michael Dukakis, Rod Blagojevich, and the recently departed Cuomo (or his idiot son for that matter), just to name a few. Heck, there are few R Gov's who really cut the mustard. I wouldn't vote for Bush or Christie in a primary, and would have to hold my nose in a general.
        
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink
        
        -
        
        5
        
        Posted by rockymountainpirate 10 years ago
        
        I wouldn't vote for my governor to be the town drunk. Total idiot.
        
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink
        
        -
        
        4
        
        Posted by khalling 10 years ago
        
        lololol. best phrase of the new year
        
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink
        
        Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
        
        2
        
        Posted by Robbie53024 10 years ago
        
        Pretty young year for a "best" don'tcha think?
        
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink
        
        Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
        
        1
        
        Posted by Robbie53024 10 years ago
        
        Are you confident that he's not double-dipping?
        
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink
        
        1
        
        Posted by rockymountainpirate 10 years ago
        
        No.
        
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink
        
        -
        
        4
        
        Posted by khalling 10 years ago
        
        I usually also choose a governor. I'd really like another entrepreneur to run. I think Cain would have been great
        
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink
        
        3
        
        Posted by rockymountainpirate 10 years ago
        
        Cain has the smarts but they already took him out of contention
        
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink
        
        1
        
        Posted by jdg 10 years ago
        
        I'd vote for Steve Forbes, but I doubt he'll try again.
        
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink
        
        3
        
        Posted by rockymountainpirate 10 years ago
        
        A few potentially good ones? That's nice. It get stuff from them all the time and just delete without reading. I'm longing for a politician that has read the Constitution and actually understands it.
        
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink
  - 2
    
    Posted by Old4WDGuy 10 years ago
    
    When the free stuff and give me thats stop coming in.
    
    Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink
  - 1
    
    Posted by edweaver 10 years ago
    
    When they feel enough pain. IMHO it has to get much worse before it is ever going to get better.
    
    Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink

Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
6

Posted by Robbie53024 10 years ago

Yeah. If that's the choice, there's really not much difference.

Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink
- 3
  
  Posted by rockymountainpirate 10 years ago
  
  Bush has a better stylist. hilary wears pant suits made by Omar the Tent Maker. Between her and moochelle they are setting the world of fashion back centuries.
  
  Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink
  - Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
  - 5
    
    Posted by Robbie53024 10 years ago
    
    Well, there's not much you can do to hide "thunder thighs." Oops, did that get out?
    
    Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink
    - 4
      
      Posted by freedomforall 10 years ago
      
      Swish, thump. Swish, thump. Swish, thump...
      
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink
    - 2
      
      Posted by rockymountainpirate 10 years ago
      
      There are some tricks. Both those women show what they are on the inside by how they look on the outside. No stylist can disguise that.
      
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink
      - Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
      - 5
        
        Posted by Robbie53024 10 years ago
        
        No. The person they are inside has nothing to do with their outward appearance. They are both disgustingly ugly, and would be so even to a person blind from birth.
        
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink
        
        -
        
        3
        
        Posted by khalling 10 years ago
        
        I don't think Jeb is anything to look at. I think it's funny that you guys are talking about their looks as a discrediting feature and the dems put down Sarah Palin's GOOD looks down for the same reason. interesting
        
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink
        
        Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
        
        6
        
        Posted by Robbie53024 10 years ago
        
        Just to be totally clear - when I said that they were disgustingly ugly, I meant on the inside. That is why even a blind person would come to the same conclusion.
        
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink
        
        4
        
        Posted by rockymountainpirate 10 years ago
        
        I agree.
        
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink
        
        -
        
        4
        
        Posted by rockymountainpirate 10 years ago
        
        I don't discredit them because they are ugly, as in born that way. To me they are ugly because of who they are inside and it just shows on the outside.
        
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink
        
        -
        
        3
        
        Posted by khalling 10 years ago
        
        yes. I am not criticizing. I am pointing out that Sarah Palin was discredited for having a beautiful face, figure and smile...that somehow she lacked virtue because of this. f'ed up
        
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink
        
        3
        
        Posted by rockymountainpirate 10 years ago
        
        Yep. There is a real double standard there.
        
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink
        
        1
        
        Posted by jdg 10 years ago
        
        Everybody in national politics gets trash talked. Palin has shown she can't take it, so she shouldn't be a candidate again.
        
        But I'd marry her in a heartbeat. Or subscribe if she gets her own TV show.
        
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink
  - 2
    
    Posted by teri-amborn 10 years ago
    
    Don't worry...
    The way things are going all of us chicks will be donning burkas styled by Omar the Tent Maker.
    
    Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink
    - 4
      
      Posted by rockymountainpirate 10 years ago
      
      I will not comply. If you want to use force, bring guns.
      
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink
      - 2
        
        Posted by teri-amborn 10 years ago
        
        I concur...however the current atmosphere of fear and reaction in this country is much more "flight" than "fight".
        
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink

4

Posted by wiggys 10 years ago

i think it is irrelevant which of them wins, we are already on the road to socialism/fascism and neither of them would ever try and stop it.
when the economy collapses their money will not have any value either.

Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink

4

Posted by freedomforall 10 years ago

Cripple the power of the office to what it was under G. Washington. It should be a constitutional republic, not a dictatorial aristocracy.

Alternatively, one requirement for all who want to run for office could be enrollment in the human testing for ebola drugs. First infect each participant/candidate with ebola...

Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink

3

Posted by amhunt 10 years ago

Yes -- disaster A or disaster B?
Both need to be discarded NOW!

Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink

3

Posted by jpellone 10 years ago

There has to be better than these two. If that is all this country can produce WE THE PEOPLE are in real trouble...

Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink
- 4
  
  Posted by rockymountainpirate 10 years ago
  
  We are in trouble
  
  Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink

3

Posted by johnpe1 10 years ago

these power-hungry people disgust me. -- j

p.s. Washington took the job reluctantly, to
perpetuate the goodness in the nation,
and he could see it clearly. . can anyone
in power see that value, now???

Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink
- 2
  
  Posted by plusaf 10 years ago
  
  http://www.plusaf.com/falklaws.htm#41st
  
  Yep...
  
  Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink

3

Posted by allosaur 10 years ago

Hear ye, hear ye, peons of the vassal states! Hear ye!,
Hear ye to know ye that two great royal houses shall contend for the crown in the Year of Our Lord 2016.
Who shall rule the Oval Office Throne? Which pair of pants shall it be?

Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink

3

Posted by Lysander 10 years ago

Neither for me as well, yikes!

Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink

2

Posted by edweaver 10 years ago

Neither for me too!

Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink

2

Posted by samrigel 10 years ago

Absolutely NO MORE Clintons or Bushs in the White House, time for a truly Conservative change and they ain't it.

Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink
- 4
  
  Posted by rockymountainpirate 10 years ago
  
  How about a Constitutionalist rather than a conservative.
  
  Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink
  - 4
    
    Posted by edweaver 10 years ago
    
    I agree! Personally I prefer a constitutional libertarian. They believe in a limited government and individual freedom to make their own choices.
    
    Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink
  - 1
    
    Posted by samrigel 10 years ago
    
    I can do that............what about a Constitutional Conservative??
    
    Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink
    - 2
      
      Posted by edweaver 10 years ago
      
      I am not sure that is possible. The trouble I have with conservatives is most are socially liberal. That leads to more programs and less individual freedom. I believe that a constitutional libertarian is the best choice because they believe in a very limited government, the rule of law and hold individuals right to choose in very high esteem. Personally I feel electing people with these values is the best choice if we are to ever get back to the original founders vision for America.
      
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink
      - Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
      - 4
        
        Posted by Robbie53024 10 years ago
        
        Actually, Ed, most conservatives are not socially liberal (that would mean that they advocate for more liberty on social issues, not less). They are economically liberal. And of course, I use the term "liberal" in the classical meaning - as in liberty, not the bastardized current meaning of socialist/progressive.
        
        I like your original position of "constitutional libertarian." What the Constitution spells out for powers, nothing more, and all else is up to the states/individuals.
        
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink
        
        -
        
        2
        
        Posted by edweaver 10 years ago
        
        It sounds like we are in agreement. Yes I was using the word liberal in the bastardized meaning.
        
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink
        
        Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
        
        2
        
        Posted by Robbie53024 10 years ago
        
        Makes communicating clearly problematic - one of the objectives of the thought police and use of double-speak.
        
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink
        
        -
        
        2
        
        Posted by edweaver 10 years ago
        
        Agreed. I usually say progressive instead of liberal but for some silly reason failed this time. My bad.
        
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink
        
        1
        
        Posted by jdg 10 years ago
        
        I won't call any leftist "liberal" OR "progressive". They are dead-set against both liberty and progress.
        
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink
      - 2
        
        Posted by amhunt 10 years ago
        
        Spot on -- very nicely put!
        
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink

1

Posted by fivedollargold 10 years ago

Yeesh.

Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink

Today's cartoon | Personal Liberty

Add Comment

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

Working...