- Hot
- New
- Categories...
- Producer's Lounge
- Producer's Vault
- The Gulch: Live! (New)
- Ask the Gulch!
- Going Galt
- Books
- Business
- Classifieds
- Culture
- Economics
- Education
- Entertainment
- Government
- History
- Humor
- Legislation
- Movies
- News
- Philosophy
- Pics
- Politics
- Science
- Technology
- Video
- The Gulch: Best of
- The Gulch: Bugs
- The Gulch: Feature Requests
- The Gulch: Featured Producers
- The Gulch: General
- The Gulch: Introductions
- The Gulch: Local
- The Gulch: Promotions
- Marketplace
- Members
- Store
- More...
When the Emperor wears no clothes, you don't see his white half.
The White House defends the policy as a reasonable use of Mr. Obama’s powers to set priorities for enforcing laws, and to stop the break-up of families due to deportation.
Since when is stopping the breakup of families due to deportation an overriding requirement to what the Federal Government should be doing?
I answer my own question. They don't care about what it SHOULD be doing.
When a mother and/or father breaks up their family by violating a just law, THEY are responsible, not Big Daddy in the District of Criminals.
I hope this judge has good security.
Too bad The Supremes haven't decided the issue yet instead of sitting around singing "Mister Postman."
The elite much prefer a citizenry that is accustomed to serfdom, like from most latin countries south of the US.
Schwab wrote:
President Obama’s executive action goes beyond prosecutorial discretion because: (a) it provides for a systematic and rigid process by which a broad group of individuals will be treated differently than others based upon arbitrary classifications, rather than case-by-case examination; and (b) it allows undocumented immigrants, who fall within these broad categories, to obtain substantive rights.