O - M - G !! I'm not often STUNNED...
This is the worst news in a long time.
Some of the worst news EVER.
We have succeeded in making the last Communist Power into the world's most powerful economy.
Some of the worst news EVER.
We have succeeded in making the last Communist Power into the world's most powerful economy.
While China is officially Communist, in many ways they are more capitalistic than the US is now.
That being the case, my bet would be on the yuan's value relative to the dollar to drop significantly before stabilizing.
Manufacturing
Of the three, the last two are regulated nearly out of existence in the US, compared with China.
The first is less regulated, but owners of small farms, such as mine, are careful not to become too obvious, lest the USDA (set up to encourage good farming, or so I understood) discover more regulations I need to follow. The requirement that I spend several hundred thousand to continue a petting zoo--it generated an extra $3000 per annum gross--put a stop to that. "Not even worth the expense of trying to fight."
Hope & Change, baby.
Or, as I like to say, "You voted for it, Comrade!"
Thank you for your concern.
http://www.rosettastone.com/learn-chines...
I'm saying that, as China's economy grows, American companies will need more people to interact with Chinese companies in their language.
People who can speak Mandarin will be in high demand.
Don't tell me we're the same. What they are now is the worst nightmare of what we could become.
Propaganda, state control of the media, jail for dissidents.
No. If it doesn't qualify as Communist "any more than the US" ... well...
THEY call THEMSELVES that. Proudly. As a profound morale and political division from the West.
But Communism is slavery. Nothing less.
It is EVIL, inherently dangerous and must be opposed.
You really don't see the difference between a left-leaning America and a full-on Communist Superpower?
Do you remember WHY you oppose Socialism in America when you dismiss concerns about Communist China.
----
No doubt you say the difference is that we're moving toward Socialism while they're moving toward Capitalism.
I say "Show me."
Show me what progress they've made. Political progress that is.
How long has it been? Decades. Long enough for them to grow into the world's largest economy.
So after all that time - all that growth - how much closer is Tiananmen Square to fruition.
Show me the cracks in their totalitarian state.
You are missing my point, China is no more "communist" than we are "socialist" or even "Democratic" for that matter. It may have been Mao's grand idea, but I think it was just wallpaper like it has always been. It is just a way to cover up a small group who will be the power brokers in the society. No "Communist" state has ever existed that I have found, they are all just mislabeled despotic dictatorships, catering to a few "elites" and trampling the rest. You should see that our present society does much the same (we have a few elites, and the middle class that used to be the majority and backbone of the country, are now quite trampled). What I am saying is that stripped of all the pretty labels, both countries are virtually the same. The Chinese are just a bit more open in their blatent control of the right parts of the system so they can control their people. Don't you see the US is essentially the same? The Obamanation is proof of thet, the will of the people was expressed by the Congress, so he will just veto it. Sort of like the Party Chairman saying "no". No difference, just different wallpaper....
There is a concrete difference between being imprisoned and having your tax exempt status held up by the IRS.
Next time, Nick,
Now I am not sure how many of you will remember the concept, but it is better to make a nickle a billion times than to $5 a 1000 times... and with a dollars price difference in cost of manufacturing the sales goes to the cheaper labor, and add the quality of product into the equation, you will sell cheaply made cheaply price products ten times for every one of the top quality type.
But hey I am not one of the top ten percent of income bracket, so what do I understand about this. Does 10 years of engineering school and 17 years in business of manufacturing mean anything, not in this economic environment.
My opinion on the subject
Two more steps to go and it will be complete!!!
Then comes the "Transformation" of America from a free country to a "Slave" country!!!
So unless you are taking home about $3000 clear a month you are in the working poor(corporate slaves).
Indeed, poor countries are the biggest threat to freedom and stability in the world. It's good that many of them are finally starting to become rich, in spite of the best efforts of Soros and the CFR to prevent that from ever happening. (Remember, they're not there yet -- China still has 5 times the population of the US, so their per-capita wealth is proportionally smaller.)
Has it weakened them yet?
I have no problem becoming the 2nd largest economy. Should the world ever become free, our lesser status will be inevitable. We are only the 3rd most populous country.
I have a problem with propping up a communist stronghold into the #1 spot.
That is DANGEROUS.
But I'm skeptical of the "certainty" of success.
That said, when you have taken over a significant part of another country's economy, you have effectively conquered it.
During the course of defending himself from basically frivolous criminal charges which were intended to shut down his business more than to put him in prison (he was acquitted), he said more or less that "if things go on like this we'll be buying our televisions and radios from our former enemies" (then, Germany and Japan).
Well?
Thanks for the story. It’s worthy of a mental file!
We began to throw this country away when the man with an idea and the willingness to pursue it ceased to be a heroic figure in popular culture. Most of the 20th Century and part of the 21st was invented by men and women working alone (or perhaps with the backing of others who believed in them) and making breakthroughs which the status quo believed impossible. Not to mention that there were institutions like Bell Labs where large staffs of thinkers were paid to put their thoughts to the test. Some may find the story of Charles Steinmetz interesting--it can be easily found online).
Those individuals were (and wherever they may be now, are) the soul of America. Deny them funding, steal their patents, shut down their basement laboratories because of zoning regulations (it's happened!), and you tear the heart out of the nation.
People wring their hands and ask were all the US jobs went. My answer is look at the label stupid.
Good luck on defining "fair."
I also believe that it does not matter what country it is. If people are free from government intrusion and control, all people will become exceptional. America is proof.
I have to admit, for every barrel of oil (or whatever commodity) we buy from a foreign power, we are saving one that is locating on our own territory. And when foreign reserves are depleted and they come looking to us....our natural assets will have appreciated in value.
Falk's Twenty-Eighth Law:
No matter what happens...
•28a ... there is always someone ready to tell you that it happened according to his or her pet theory.
•28b ... there is always someone ready to misinterpret what it means.
•28c ... there is always someone who says they predicted it all along...
•28d ... there is always someone who won't believe it until they have "the proof" in their own hands or unless they "saw it with their own eyes..."
•28e ... there is always someone who will blame it on some kind of conspiracy...
•28f ... there is always someone who won't believe it at all, no matter what kind of proof is presented...
•28g ... there is always someone who will feel offended by it...
Guys and gals, have you forgotten that there are TEN TIMES as many people in China as there are in the US?! If their GDP or stock market valuation or price of manure exceeds that of the US, on a per capita basis, they're doing ONE TENTH as well as we are.
What part of that did you miss in the MSM's screaming blather.
Yeah, we've got shitloads of problems holding US back, mostly self-inflicted.
For years I've been trying to get people to understand that manufacturing ALWAYS goes to the low-COST provider, and as Japan began to outsource to China and China started to 'offshore' to Vietnam and now India, Malaysia and so on, the LAST domino in that line would be Sub-Saharan Africa! And that has recently been reported to be the newest location for 'cheap manufacturing labor' that corporations are looking at.
The 'problem' with that fear-mongering theory is this: After Japan, China, Vietnam, Malaysia, India and Sub-Saharan Africa, WHERE CAN THEY GO NEXT?
Nowhere. As ALL of those economies grow and start creating middle-class aspirations and market demands, ALL salaries and manufacturing costs MUST rise to some kind of equilibrium, although it may take a few more decades to get there. I will happen.
Or you can go on believing what you believe and ignoring everything I say. It's been done before. Enjoy!
Forget everything I said...
Four times the people making half as much still out produce your nation 2 to 1.
But it's not the productivity per se that concerns me.
It's the economic power given to a Communist Nation.
It may be out of fashion to hate communism, but being cool with a vast totalitarian state is not my style.
(But with all that said - I really liked that 28th Law - spot on!)
But (you expected a 'but,' right?)... what's 'production' mean any more? Manufacturing? It looks like the percent of an economy dedicated to 'manufacturing' decreases as the economy moves up the wealth 'food chain.' No? Most just shift to service-based, as the US has.
And there are smart, inventive people all around the world, so yes, the economic power probably WILL gravitate to the folks with the largest populations.
But (again), 'economic power' is not GIVEN to any Nation, it's earned. So if the US is to remain remotely competitive with ANY other countries, we've got to look at what MAKES a country 'competitive' and put the enabling forces in place.
To me, it looks like the US MAY be able to continue to do that, but with Obama at the helm and Hilarity queued up to follow, keeping the lead or regaining it looks very unlikely to me.
Time will tell. So, what were those 'enablers' again? :)
Oh, and look what just popped into my Inbox... http://www.marketminder.com/a/fisher-inv...
An alternate perspective from my buds at Fisher.
Enjoy!
I commented on another forum that he himself points out what the rest of the world uses as a guide and that he then dismisses it as unimportant without any evidence or reason.
You will note: this is a Communist Power, using partially capitalist methods on a base of socialist efforts for decades.
It has a very short shelf-life - it cannot sustain itself. No communist or socialist system ever lasts more than 50 years without resorting to cannibalizing their neighbors (China's already done that as far as we'll let them) or resorting to capitalism (which they have already started doing), but they still collapse within 75 years.
Thousands of experiments around the world have been tried - they've all failed; hundreds in my state alone (Texas).
When you see this article on the Wall Street Journal or some other major source, then worry.
Now it's more like Baghdad Bob whining in the dark about the success of Iraq's forces against the Americans in the last war.
It's meaningless.
Glad to see China is seeing some prosperity - after all the garbage they've dealt with, the people deserve it.
No worries at all.
JFK Democrat here and I've been watching my party slide that direction for way too long while fellow Democrats abandoned the party. Won't do that myself - I fight from within.
I'll do a Galt with the party when there is absolutely no point to doing otherwise, for me.
The Socialist Party of America said in the 1970s that they would use the Democratic Party as their face to America. They said they'd crash the economy to change it to socialism (Separate statements).
More than half of our Democratic Congresspeople are members of the Democratic Socialists of America.
Even Obama was a member of a party in Illinois who lifted their platform directly from the DSA.
Yeah, I see it.
You see the socialism in the country.
You continue to support it - you're still American.
Are you mad?
By the standards you're applying, you seem to judge it so.
I did not say anything about mad. I did however suggest it sounded like madness to support something you don't agree with. Doing so says to me that one may not be that much against it. If that is the case I would not believe that those individuals would even consider Ayn Rands philosophy acceptable so it surprises me that you are on this sight. Are you just following Saul Alinski path and trying to stir the pot?
Why would I abandon my party to the very people I disagree with? I watched them take more and more power as so called "Democrats" proved cowardly under the guise of "the party left me, I didn't leave the party", giving more and more power to those they disagreed with.
I stayed, and fight. I despise Socialism.
If staying and fighting for something while remaining a member is madness, then I suggest that the alternative, running and leaving your group the the people whom are destroying it and that you disagree with is cowardly and if you expect it to help, insane as well.
But a great many OBJ's consider Dems the default position due to the Republican social agenda.
In fact, She famously refused to endorse Ronald Reagan because of his support for the Moral Majority.
Myself, I vote Republican but never with enthusiasm.
I might vote for a Democrat if I could find one with any concept of economics.
I am not sure I understand voting Democrat for their social position. Nor the same for the republicans. I have also voted more republican than any other party but also less than enthusiastically. Neither party is supporting limited government enough but the democratic party is all about a large government with massive spending. That I cannot support. But I would vote for one if they supported limited gov.
There are finally a few who may be different - but it's still sooo early. What real influence do they really wield.
God save me from Priests and Politicians.
(Oh, and lawyers, too. Gawd almighty, PLEASE protect me from LAWYERS! Ha!)
I'm curious as to your answer.
Unless you leave and my challenge remains - WHEN would you leave the country to the very people you oppose?
Still waiting on that.
You live in a country because you support it's ideals, it's vision, it's dream.
Each person has a line after which the country/group has changed enough that they leave.
Some refuse to leave the group to those they disagree with (in my case, Socialists) and continue to fight them in my own way.
Are you really saying you can't comprehend that?Or the parallel between staying in a country? You seem to not understand that I am drawing a parallel there - it's too close to be a metaphor.
And I'm still waiting on answering a simple question which you've evaded twice now. That's revealing in itself.
I do see the parallel you are trying to draw but I do not believe them a good comparison. Much more difficult to leave a country than a political party. Personally I don't understand belonging to any party. I support candidates that believe in limited government no matter what party they belong to.
I believe I answered your question a couple responses back when you asked about leaving the party if a religious group tried to take over a party. I did not find any question you asked me twice so I cannot pinpoint if that was the question. Please let know what the question was if that was not it and I will provide an answer.
Missed your answer - not a problem.
I get your idea and agree about country and party.
But now you know I don't support them and I vote for the least socialist member I can (I lose nearly every time).
Maybe I'll reach that point.
We'll see.
Yah I am used too losing too, except this last election.
Outside of the Bible, it is hard to believe much of anything written any more.
Is it pertinent that China has many times our population or does the PPP account for that - or is that irrelevant because we're concentrating on total economic power without regard to population?
Load more comments...