10

O - M - G !! I'm not often STUNNED...

Posted by Zero 9 years, 11 months ago to Economics
118 comments | Share | Flag

This is the worst news in a long time.
Some of the worst news EVER.

We have succeeded in making the last Communist Power into the world's most powerful economy.
SOURCE URL: http://www.msn.com/en-us/money/economy/it%E2%80%99s-official-america-is-now-no-2/ar-BBgjXGo


Add Comment

FORMATTING HELP

All Comments Hide marked as read Mark all as read

  • Posted by $ jbrenner 9 years, 11 months ago
    So when does the world dump the dollar as the reserve currency?

    While China is officially Communist, in many ways they are more capitalistic than the US is now.

    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ blarman 9 years, 11 months ago
      When China finally unpegs its own currency, watch for the dominoes to fall.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by $ jbrenner 9 years, 11 months ago
        I am not really looking forward to that.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by $ blarman 9 years, 11 months ago
          Neither am I, but it will be a necessary step. China really can't try to divest themselves of their US connections before doing so. The thing I think many underestimate is that the Chinese economy will see _major_ upheaval when that is the case. They currently peg the yuan so as to give themselves international trade leverage and piggyback on the stability and universality of the dollar. When their currency is allowed to truly float, there are going to be some massive market adjustments. If I had any idea how they'd pan out, I'd invest accordingly.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
          • Posted by $ jbrenner 9 years, 11 months ago
            Maybe we should try the corresponding VIX, which measures the volatility of certain investments.
            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
            • Posted by $ blarman 9 years, 11 months ago
              I'm an IT guy, so I'd have to have someone in finance explain to me what that is. I'm guessing some kind of investment vehicle... ?
              Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
              • Posted by $ jbrenner 9 years, 11 months ago
                A VIX is a derivative investment, with derivative being in the calculus sense. Which direction is the stock or commodity moving? When the stock or commodity is moving up or down very quickly, the "VIX" is high. A zero VIX would mean that there is no volatility in the price of a stock or commodity. I think that VIX stands for volatility index.
                Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                • Posted by $ blarman 9 years, 11 months ago
                  Cool. Thanks.

                  That being the case, my bet would be on the yuan's value relative to the dollar to drop significantly before stabilizing.
                  Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                  • Posted by $ jbrenner 9 years, 11 months ago
                    Possibly. When the world decides that America is no longer worthy of having the dollar as the reserve currency, the dollar will certainly plummet in value. For many, that will be the time to shrug.
                    Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Abaco 9 years, 11 months ago
    One word...

    Manufacturing
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ Snezzy 9 years, 11 months ago
      As far as I can tell, there are three ways to create wealth--farming, mining, and manufacturing. Everything else is just moving the wealth around, protecting it, using it, or destroying it.

      Of the three, the last two are regulated nearly out of existence in the US, compared with China.

      The first is less regulated, but owners of small farms, such as mine, are careful not to become too obvious, lest the USDA (set up to encourage good farming, or so I understood) discover more regulations I need to follow. The requirement that I spend several hundred thousand to continue a petting zoo--it generated an extra $3000 per annum gross--put a stop to that. "Not even worth the expense of trying to fight."

      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by $ Terrylutz3682 9 years, 11 months ago
        I agree that farming, mining, and manufacturing are the only ways to create wealth. Our government allowed the Chinese to manipulate their currency and therefore US manufactures are not on a level playing field. This has reduced the wealth creation of manufacturing and will result in the USA being a second rate country.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by khalling 9 years, 11 months ago
          I gave you a point back for the discussion but this is an incorrect statement. Wealth creation comes from invention. Since China has weak property rights for invention they must steal technology. That is a separate question from currency manipulation. Invention determines which resources have value and invention determines how to get the resources, what to manufacture and how to manufacture. Invention provides hardy crops to harvest, how to irrigate the crops andhow to harvest. Invention is the source of all wealth creation and it is unlimited barring regulation and weak protection in IP rights.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ nickursis 9 years, 11 months ago
    Well, I am not too sure I really care. China does not qualify in my mind as a Communist society any more than the US is. They just use the label and the structure to impose their own version of a dictatorship on the masses, and they have all the failings of our "capitalist" system, just about 3x the size. There was a thing here in the news last week where they arrested some official and "found" a bunch of gold, silver and currency stashed in his house. Is that any different than the congressman from Louisiana last year or so who just "happened" to have a 100,000 in his freezer? They just have their politicians a little bit different in their corruption, but still the same.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by 9 years, 11 months ago
      They have one party rule - that you don't eve vote for - and political opposition is not allowed.

      Don't tell me we're the same. What they are now is the worst nightmare of what we could become.

      Propaganda, state control of the media, jail for dissidents.

      No. If it doesn't qualify as Communist "any more than the US" ... well...
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by $ nickursis 9 years, 11 months ago
        Do you really believe we have more than one party rule right now? Does it matter which dysfunctional party has a majority in the US? Both parties claim they "care" more than the other, yet the results are the same. Control of the media? I have to grant some of that, although they just filter out the extreme critical material, there is a thriving underground internet there, as well as texting done. Jail for dissidents? I think we could scrape up some people in jail on some very suspicious and loose charges here. My point is calling a nation "Communist" like some dirty disease, is no longer true, oppression and control can be painted in many colors, even Red and Blue. We are no longer a nation united behind a moral ethos, and a fair application of laws and rules, and that has been going on for a while.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by 9 years, 11 months ago
          I'm not the one calling China "communist", it's not some pejorative I've flung out in angry haste.

          THEY call THEMSELVES that. Proudly. As a profound morale and political division from the West.

          But Communism is slavery. Nothing less.
          It is EVIL, inherently dangerous and must be opposed.

          You really don't see the difference between a left-leaning America and a full-on Communist Superpower?
          Do you remember WHY you oppose Socialism in America when you dismiss concerns about Communist China.

          ----
          No doubt you say the difference is that we're moving toward Socialism while they're moving toward Capitalism.

          I say "Show me."
          Show me what progress they've made. Political progress that is.
          How long has it been? Decades. Long enough for them to grow into the world's largest economy.

          So after all that time - all that growth - how much closer is Tiananmen Square to fruition.
          Show me the cracks in their totalitarian state.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
          • Posted by $ nickursis 9 years, 11 months ago
            Zero,
            You are missing my point, China is no more "communist" than we are "socialist" or even "Democratic" for that matter. It may have been Mao's grand idea, but I think it was just wallpaper like it has always been. It is just a way to cover up a small group who will be the power brokers in the society. No "Communist" state has ever existed that I have found, they are all just mislabeled despotic dictatorships, catering to a few "elites" and trampling the rest. You should see that our present society does much the same (we have a few elites, and the middle class that used to be the majority and backbone of the country, are now quite trampled). What I am saying is that stripped of all the pretty labels, both countries are virtually the same. The Chinese are just a bit more open in their blatent control of the right parts of the system so they can control their people. Don't you see the US is essentially the same? The Obamanation is proof of thet, the will of the people was expressed by the Congress, so he will just veto it. Sort of like the Party Chairman saying "no". No difference, just different wallpaper....
            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by lonerinfl 9 years, 11 months ago
    If you are a business that manufactures anything in the USA then try this little experiment. First make a survey location in your local malls. Then create 1000 pcs of your product in boxes clearly marked "Made In USA", and 1000 in a box that has no clear markings on it but does show "Made in China" on the box. then put them out on a kiosk with a price difference of just 50 cents. See the results and then you will have the fact that a small price difference makes the difference in sales. It is simple economics for basic income people. The lowest price wins, and that is why the manufacturing has moved to other countries like China, especially when they manipulate the value of their products to make them cost less, and take a smaller profit on them to control the market share.

    Now I am not sure how many of you will remember the concept, but it is better to make a nickle a billion times than to $5 a 1000 times... and with a dollars price difference in cost of manufacturing the sales goes to the cheaper labor, and add the quality of product into the equation, you will sell cheaply made cheaply price products ten times for every one of the top quality type.

    But hey I am not one of the top ten percent of income bracket, so what do I understand about this. Does 10 years of engineering school and 17 years in business of manufacturing mean anything, not in this economic environment.

    My opinion on the subject
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by term2 9 years, 11 months ago
    Interesting side comment, in Las Vegas BEFORE you can open ANY business, you need prior approval from the city that your business is covered by one of their categories. Meanwhile, Putin is trying to free up Russian regulations to allow businesses more freedom, and its easier to start a business in China than it is here. No wonder we are failing as a superpower.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by wiggys 9 years, 11 months ago
    why is anyone surprised. it has been 25 plus years of companies from all over the western world to include the usa, canada, europe and even japan getting product made in china. government motors (GM) has 11 or 13 factories there. but keep in mind that since the usa and europe are the biggest consumer market in the world going down hill the manufacturing that was going on in china is also going down hill. without a manufacturing base every nation will go down hill.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by eddieh 9 years, 11 months ago
      That's very true I've read that Japan was importing 90% of it`s chopsticks from China and China was imposing a surcharge due to a shortage of timber.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by jpellone 9 years, 11 months ago
    Step 2 of Obamas' destruction of America complete...
    Two more steps to go and it will be complete!!!

    Then comes the "Transformation" of America from a free country to a "Slave" country!!!
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by lonerinfl 9 years, 11 months ago
      We are already a slave to corporation state. Either through credit cards, which you are expected to have and or required to have to buy or rent just about anything, or through Fascist regulations on insurance for whatever you are wanting to do, IE: car insurance for driving, Liability insurance for lawyers, doctors and most any business. Now mandatory health insurance, home insurance, the list goes on and on....
      So unless you are taking home about $3000 clear a month you are in the working poor(corporate slaves).
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ jdg 9 years, 11 months ago
    I have no problem with this -- because as Chinese individuals become wealthier, it will become harder and harder for the government to keep them unfree. At some point either the Communists will crack down again and stop the economic progress, or the progress will sweep them away.

    Indeed, poor countries are the biggest threat to freedom and stability in the world. It's good that many of them are finally starting to become rich, in spite of the best efforts of Soros and the CFR to prevent that from ever happening. (Remember, they're not there yet -- China still has 5 times the population of the US, so their per-capita wealth is proportionally smaller.)
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by 9 years, 11 months ago
      Why will the progress sweep them away?
      Has it weakened them yet?

      I have no problem becoming the 2nd largest economy. Should the world ever become free, our lesser status will be inevitable. We are only the 3rd most populous country.

      I have a problem with propping up a communist stronghold into the #1 spot.

      That is DANGEROUS.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by DaveM49 9 years, 11 months ago
    We are basically a Chinese colony. Which in a strange way, may protect us from a Red Menace style invasion. After all, if the Chinese invaded us, they'd lose their primary market and go bankrupt.

    That said, when you have taken over a significant part of another country's economy, you have effectively conquered it.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by $ Mimi 9 years, 11 months ago
      Interesting...does that means in a way...Germany does own Europe now?
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by DaveM49 9 years, 11 months ago
        Quite possibly. I am reminded of a line attributed to Preston Tucker, founder of the Tucker Motor Company (makers of the "Tucker Torpedo"--I believe only 50 were produced). He was basically shut down by The Big Three (who have long since incorporated all of his ideas into their own cars).

        During the course of defending himself from basically frivolous criminal charges which were intended to shut down his business more than to put him in prison (he was acquitted), he said more or less that "if things go on like this we'll be buying our televisions and radios from our former enemies" (then, Germany and Japan).

        Well?
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by $ Mimi 9 years, 11 months ago
          Jay Leno has a Torpedo, doesn’t he? Gorgeous car.
          Thanks for the story. It’s worthy of a mental file!
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
          • Posted by DaveM49 9 years, 11 months ago
            The scene is dramatized in "Tucker: The Man And His Dream". The trial scene does not resemble Tucker's trial other than in the most general sense, but most, if not all of the comments made in the movie are drawn from actual statements made by Preston Tucker. A personal favorite: "If Benjamin Franklin was alive today, he would be arrested for flying a kite without a license".

            We began to throw this country away when the man with an idea and the willingness to pursue it ceased to be a heroic figure in popular culture. Most of the 20th Century and part of the 21st was invented by men and women working alone (or perhaps with the backing of others who believed in them) and making breakthroughs which the status quo believed impossible. Not to mention that there were institutions like Bell Labs where large staffs of thinkers were paid to put their thoughts to the test. Some may find the story of Charles Steinmetz interesting--it can be easily found online).

            Those individuals were (and wherever they may be now, are) the soul of America. Deny them funding, steal their patents, shut down their basement laboratories because of zoning regulations (it's happened!), and you tear the heart out of the nation.
            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by term2 9 years, 11 months ago
    I am not surprised at all. For our small company, we just CANT AFFORD to buy from american companies (and most of them get their stuff from China anyway). Its so easy to trade with the Chinese- they give good customer service, excellent prices, fast response to orders and questions. These are all things American companies have been very bad at, and they are paying the price. In addition, hiring american workers (as in legal ones) is a real pain and a drag on business. They feel entitled ($15/hr minimum wage for example), dont really want to work, and refuse to compete with lower paid workers (illegal aliens and other countries). If I want to stay in business, I HAVE TO BUY FROM CHINA no matter what.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by DaveM49 9 years, 11 months ago
      By way of comparison, when Sam Walton ran Walmart, everything in the store was made in the United States. He was a very shrewd businessman and able to buy in quantities which allowed him to virtually dictate prices to his suppliers or watch them go out of business for lack of orders. But....if you go to Walmart now, try finding something for sale that is made in the United States. Chances are you can manage, but you will have to look for a while.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by term2 9 years, 11 months ago
        Its a difficult situation. I am not sure what caused this to happen, but I can see that the difficulties of running businesses in the USA cause the costs here to be artificially higher. The more employees you have here, the worse it is and the greater the risks of getting into burreaucratic troubles. I think we are headed to a venezuela type economy, particularly with the likes of the Obama socialist crowd in power.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by DaveM49 9 years, 11 months ago
          A bit of a tangent: several of the largest iron ore reserves in the world are located in part of the U.S.A. (northern Minnesota). At least one of the mining companies there is partially owned by a Chinese firm. Which means that every American dollar that goes to buy iron is in part paid to the Chinese. Not a good sign.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by term2 9 years, 11 months ago
          It pains me to send money to china, only to support a communist country which will one day turn on us. I do have to say the chinese people I have dealt with are very entrepreneurial and are really into customer service. They are a pleasure to deal with. My choice is to buy from chiina, or just stop doing business. We sell about $1M of goods here in the US, and it would all go away.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by $ Terrylutz3682 9 years, 11 months ago
    I am for fair trade not free trade. Our government over the years negotiated poor trade agreements but on top of that they did not enforce the agreements. China violated the agreement by manipulating their currency. A company I owned, Signicast, had to overcome a price differential of 50% due to the the yuan's undervaluation. Signicast could over come most of this differential because we were heavily automated. Many US companies could not compete and either reduced their out put or moved to China. All we ask from our government is give us a level playing field.

    People wring their hands and ask were all the US jobs went. My answer is look at the label stupid.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by dfreund 9 years, 11 months ago
    The Chinese might have achieved this #1 status, not by their own hand as we achieved ours, but by means our temporary faulter. When we eventually shrug off the leftists, then it's all over for the Chinese. They will eventually fall by their own weight when we once again lead the world with our enlightenment and our ingenuity.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by edweaver 9 years, 11 months ago
      Not sure we are on a temporary path. Undoing what has been done is a steep mountain.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by dfreund 9 years, 11 months ago
        One of my favorite homilies is: "If you think you can or if you think you can't, you're probably right.". America's exceptionalism is largely based on our obsession with believing we can. Let's not lose that edge.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by edweaver 9 years, 11 months ago
          I like a poitive approach but one also has to understand the obstacles. IMHO americas exceptionalism came more from the freedoms offered by a limited government. People were free to become exceptional. I am positive that if our government becomes limited again we will return to exceptionalism. Once a nation becomes a socialist empire it will take generations to right the ship if it ever gets righted.

          I also believe that it does not matter what country it is. If people are free from government intrusion and control, all people will become exceptional. America is proof.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by DaveM49 9 years, 11 months ago
        There is a potential "regulator" here. China is squandering its natural resources, not only to feed its manufacturing capability, but also to supply an out of control population. The day will come--and probably not too far off--where those resources will have been exhausted. And where will they get their raw materials then? Might America rise again?

        I have to admit, for every barrel of oil (or whatever commodity) we buy from a foreign power, we are saving one that is locating on our own territory. And when foreign reserves are depleted and they come looking to us....our natural assets will have appreciated in value.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by plusaf 9 years, 11 months ago
    Oh, bullshit...

    Falk's Twenty-Eighth Law:
    No matter what happens...
    •28a ... there is always someone ready to tell you that it happened according to his or her pet theory.
    •28b ... there is always someone ready to misinterpret what it means.
    •28c ... there is always someone who says they predicted it all along...
    •28d ... there is always someone who won't believe it until they have "the proof" in their own hands or unless they "saw it with their own eyes..."
    •28e ... there is always someone who will blame it on some kind of conspiracy...
    •28f ... there is always someone who won't believe it at all, no matter what kind of proof is presented...
    •28g ... there is always someone who will feel offended by it...


    Guys and gals, have you forgotten that there are TEN TIMES as many people in China as there are in the US?! If their GDP or stock market valuation or price of manure exceeds that of the US, on a per capita basis, they're doing ONE TENTH as well as we are.

    What part of that did you miss in the MSM's screaming blather.

    Yeah, we've got shitloads of problems holding US back, mostly self-inflicted.

    For years I've been trying to get people to understand that manufacturing ALWAYS goes to the low-COST provider, and as Japan began to outsource to China and China started to 'offshore' to Vietnam and now India, Malaysia and so on, the LAST domino in that line would be Sub-Saharan Africa! And that has recently been reported to be the newest location for 'cheap manufacturing labor' that corporations are looking at.

    The 'problem' with that fear-mongering theory is this: After Japan, China, Vietnam, Malaysia, India and Sub-Saharan Africa, WHERE CAN THEY GO NEXT?

    Nowhere. As ALL of those economies grow and start creating middle-class aspirations and market demands, ALL salaries and manufacturing costs MUST rise to some kind of equilibrium, although it may take a few more decades to get there. I will happen.

    Or you can go on believing what you believe and ignoring everything I say. It's been done before. Enjoy!

    Forget everything I said...
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by 9 years, 11 months ago
      It's not the per capita that's gonna matter. It's the aggregate total.

      Four times the people making half as much still out produce your nation 2 to 1.

      But it's not the productivity per se that concerns me.

      It's the economic power given to a Communist Nation.

      It may be out of fashion to hate communism, but being cool with a vast totalitarian state is not my style.

      (But with all that said - I really liked that 28th Law - spot on!)
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by plusaf 9 years, 11 months ago
        Thanks... there are lots more you MIGHT like... at http://www.plusaf.com/falklaws.htm .

        But (you expected a 'but,' right?)... what's 'production' mean any more? Manufacturing? It looks like the percent of an economy dedicated to 'manufacturing' decreases as the economy moves up the wealth 'food chain.' No? Most just shift to service-based, as the US has.

        And there are smart, inventive people all around the world, so yes, the economic power probably WILL gravitate to the folks with the largest populations.

        But (again), 'economic power' is not GIVEN to any Nation, it's earned. So if the US is to remain remotely competitive with ANY other countries, we've got to look at what MAKES a country 'competitive' and put the enabling forces in place.

        To me, it looks like the US MAY be able to continue to do that, but with Obama at the helm and Hilarity queued up to follow, keeping the lead or regaining it looks very unlikely to me.

        Time will tell. So, what were those 'enablers' again? :)


        Oh, and look what just popped into my Inbox... http://www.marketminder.com/a/fisher-inv...
        An alternate perspective from my buds at Fisher.
        Enjoy!
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by mckenziecalhoun 9 years, 11 months ago
    The author has taken ONE part of how such things are judged and put it out as if that decides it.
    I commented on another forum that he himself points out what the rest of the world uses as a guide and that he then dismisses it as unimportant without any evidence or reason.

    You will note: this is a Communist Power, using partially capitalist methods on a base of socialist efforts for decades.

    It has a very short shelf-life - it cannot sustain itself. No communist or socialist system ever lasts more than 50 years without resorting to cannibalizing their neighbors (China's already done that as far as we'll let them) or resorting to capitalism (which they have already started doing), but they still collapse within 75 years.
    Thousands of experiments around the world have been tried - they've all failed; hundreds in my state alone (Texas).

    When you see this article on the Wall Street Journal or some other major source, then worry.

    Now it's more like Baghdad Bob whining in the dark about the success of Iraq's forces against the Americans in the last war.

    It's meaningless.
    Glad to see China is seeing some prosperity - after all the garbage they've dealt with, the people deserve it.

    No worries at all.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
    • Posted by edweaver 9 years, 11 months ago
      You are not concerned that we are on the path to communism? I see a lot of similarities. We are currently cannibalizing ourselves.
      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
      • Posted by mckenziecalhoun 9 years, 11 months ago
        I know we are, but first, Socialism.
        JFK Democrat here and I've been watching my party slide that direction for way too long while fellow Democrats abandoned the party. Won't do that myself - I fight from within.
        I'll do a Galt with the party when there is absolutely no point to doing otherwise, for me.
        The Socialist Party of America said in the 1970s that they would use the Democratic Party as their face to America. They said they'd crash the economy to change it to socialism (Separate statements).
        More than half of our Democratic Congresspeople are members of the Democratic Socialists of America.
        Even Obama was a member of a party in Illinois who lifted their platform directly from the DSA.

        Yeah, I see it.
        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
        • Posted by edweaver 9 years, 11 months ago
          You see it, don't agree with it but continue to support it?? IMHO that sounds like madness.
          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
          • Posted by mckenziecalhoun 9 years, 11 months ago
            You're an American, right?
            You see the socialism in the country.
            You continue to support it - you're still American.
            Are you mad?
            By the standards you're applying, you seem to judge it so.
            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
            • Posted by edweaver 9 years, 11 months ago
              Just because I am an America and live in America does not mean I support socialism and I would never support or vote for anyone who does.

              I did not say anything about mad. I did however suggest it sounded like madness to support something you don't agree with. Doing so says to me that one may not be that much against it. If that is the case I would not believe that those individuals would even consider Ayn Rands philosophy acceptable so it surprises me that you are on this sight. Are you just following Saul Alinski path and trying to stir the pot?
              Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
              • Posted by mckenziecalhoun 9 years, 11 months ago
                Why do you assume I support it because I am a member of the Democratic Party? That's the error in reasoning you make. I merely pointed out a parallel situation which you could use to understand, if you chose.
                Why would I abandon my party to the very people I disagree with? I watched them take more and more power as so called "Democrats" proved cowardly under the guise of "the party left me, I didn't leave the party", giving more and more power to those they disagreed with.

                I stayed, and fight. I despise Socialism.

                If staying and fighting for something while remaining a member is madness, then I suggest that the alternative, running and leaving your group the the people whom are destroying it and that you disagree with is cowardly and if you expect it to help, insane as well.
                Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                • Posted by edweaver 9 years, 11 months ago
                  I am not assuming. The democratic party is all about a socialist agenda and has been for at least the last 100 years. Voting democrat is voting socialist.
                  Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                  • Posted by 9 years, 11 months ago
                    Y'know, AR never endorsed any politician or political party. She felt it was too soon for political action, we needed to persuade the populace first.

                    But a great many OBJ's consider Dems the default position due to the Republican social agenda.
                    In fact, She famously refused to endorse Ronald Reagan because of his support for the Moral Majority.

                    Myself, I vote Republican but never with enthusiasm.
                    I might vote for a Democrat if I could find one with any concept of economics.
                    Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                    • Posted by edweaver 9 years, 11 months ago
                      I did hear AR did not support politics but thanks for the reminder.

                      I am not sure I understand voting Democrat for their social position. Nor the same for the republicans. I have also voted more republican than any other party but also less than enthusiastically. Neither party is supporting limited government enough but the democratic party is all about a large government with massive spending. That I cannot support. But I would vote for one if they supported limited gov.
                      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                      • Posted by 9 years, 11 months ago
                        They're all lying thieves who'd like nothing more than to save us from ourselves if only we'd give them the means to do so!

                        There are finally a few who may be different - but it's still sooo early. What real influence do they really wield.

                        God save me from Priests and Politicians.

                        (Oh, and lawyers, too. Gawd almighty, PLEASE protect me from LAWYERS! Ha!)
                        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                • Posted by mckenziecalhoun 9 years, 11 months ago
                  At what point if Christian fundamentalists lost their roots and tried to create a theocracy in the USA using the Republican Party would you flee the party leaving them to do what they want?

                  I'm curious as to your answer.
                  Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                  • Posted by edweaver 9 years, 11 months ago
                    Instantly. Being a member of something, no matter what it is, is supporting their agenda.
                    Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                    • Posted by mckenziecalhoun 9 years, 11 months ago
                      Then as I said, no matter where this country goes, you will support it.
                      Unless you leave and my challenge remains - WHEN would you leave the country to the very people you oppose?

                      Still waiting on that.
                      Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                      • Posted by edweaver 9 years, 11 months ago
                        So I think I am starting to understand where you are coming from. Let me see if I got this right. You believe simply living in a country means that you support everything that happens in it. Is that correct?
                        Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                        • Posted by mckenziecalhoun 9 years, 11 months ago
                          Absolutely not.
                          You live in a country because you support it's ideals, it's vision, it's dream.
                          Each person has a line after which the country/group has changed enough that they leave.
                          Some refuse to leave the group to those they disagree with (in my case, Socialists) and continue to fight them in my own way.

                          Are you really saying you can't comprehend that?Or the parallel between staying in a country? You seem to not understand that I am drawing a parallel there - it's too close to be a metaphor.

                          And I'm still waiting on answering a simple question which you've evaded twice now. That's revealing in itself.
                          Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                          • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
                          • Posted by Robbie53024 9 years, 11 months ago
                            Actually, I live here because I'm from here. Had I been born elsewhere, I'd likely live there instead. I've traveled most of the world, and might choose to live in other locations (I actually lived in Mexico for a couple of years), but this is what is familiar and home.
                            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                          • Posted by edweaver 9 years, 11 months ago
                            I reviewed this conversation and think I may have misunderstood the use of the word"it". I took it that you were saying I was supporting socialism and I think you mean America by staying in the country. If that is the case, my bad. If not then I stand with my comments and we may have to agree to disagree and move on.

                            I do see the parallel you are trying to draw but I do not believe them a good comparison. Much more difficult to leave a country than a political party. Personally I don't understand belonging to any party. I support candidates that believe in limited government no matter what party they belong to.

                            I believe I answered your question a couple responses back when you asked about leaving the party if a religious group tried to take over a party. I did not find any question you asked me twice so I cannot pinpoint if that was the question. Please let know what the question was if that was not it and I will provide an answer.
                            Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                            • Posted by mckenziecalhoun 9 years, 11 months ago
                              Dear GODS it's good to discuss things with an ethical person. My hats off to you.

                              Missed your answer - not a problem.
                              I get your idea and agree about country and party.
                              But now you know I don't support them and I vote for the least socialist member I can (I lose nearly every time).
                              Maybe I'll reach that point.
                              We'll see.
                              Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                              • Posted by edweaver 9 years, 11 months ago
                                Thank you. +1 for earned respect. :)

                                Yah I am used too losing too, except this last election.
                                Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
                                • Posted by mckenziecalhoun 9 years, 11 months ago
                                  We'll just keep speaking up, in our respective parties. I'm sure many Tea Party members wish their respective parties (Democrat, Republican, whatever it is for them) would get the message, but they found a platform, a movement separate from their party to let their ideology be heard, feeling the mainstream in their party wasn't listening enough. Certainly true in my party as a Democratic Party member who is in the Tea Party Movement as well as an Objectivist.
                                  Reply | Mark as read | Parent | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Comment hidden by post owner or admin, or due to low comment or member score. View Comment
  • Posted by flanap 9 years, 11 months ago
    History shows that this was bound to happen, if the report even has any validity and if the original data being used to define the "economy" is really representative of what the economy should be measured by.

    Outside of the Bible, it is hard to believe much of anything written any more.
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  
  • Posted by Timelord 9 years, 11 months ago
    The author of the article claims that “purchasing power parity” (or PPP), is the best measure of economic strength. I'm thoroughly unqualified to confirm or dispute that, but we should all be hyper-skeptical of anything coming from the IMF.

    Is it pertinent that China has many times our population or does the PPP account for that - or is that irrelevant because we're concentrating on total economic power without regard to population?
    Reply | Mark as read | Best of... | Permalink  

FORMATTING HELP

  • Comment hidden. Undo