

- Hot
- New
- Categories...
- Producer's Lounge
- Producer's Vault
- The Gulch: Live! (New)
- Ask the Gulch!
- Going Galt
- Books
- Business
- Classifieds
- Culture
- Economics
- Education
- Entertainment
- Government
- History
- Humor
- Legislation
- Movies
- News
- Philosophy
- Pics
- Politics
- Science
- Technology
- Video
- The Gulch: Best of
- The Gulch: Bugs
- The Gulch: Feature Requests
- The Gulch: Featured Producers
- The Gulch: General
- The Gulch: Introductions
- The Gulch: Local
- The Gulch: Promotions
- Marketplace
- Members
- Store
- More...
I was always of the opinion that it was changed when the media realized that using red for the liberals violated their unwritten, no truth in advertising policy.
.
cause a mess, and then offer to clean it up ... with
fascism. -- j
The democrats are not all dummies, and certainly their ring leaders aren't. I think the decision to take the blue color for themselves was a conscious decision, and probably choosing the only "good" one available from red, white, and blue.
Obviously if the Republicans chose to call themselves the "white states", that wouldn't work. That leaves "red" which is exactly what the democrats wanted: ironic falsehood.
Apologies, but I am not sure I understand this statement. Can you re-phrase for me?
the Autocrat Party. -- j